NJ Transit and Coach USA Death Victims Advocacy

 FYI

 Well as far as taxation,  it doesn't exist.  No taxation without representation.  Title 26 The second video is true with the exciting of using sovereign citizen. The word "sovereign citizen" within the realm of law can not exist because they are contraindications meaning you are either sovereign and or a citizen but you can not be both.  Sovereign holds your inalienable rights,  while the citizen holds privileges which you know a "privilege " can be revoked by government at anytime and at their discretion.  There is no government without " we the people" but somehow they have inverted  things to make them appear as though they are above GOD which is not true.  So to be sovereign is to be ruled by no man just God which falls into Nature's Law or Common Law anything outside of that has been perverted.  That's my thought " sovereign citizen " was Created by the FBI 2015  and was dubbed as an enemy of the state y, because a citizen is ...

 So District Judge Mary Lou Alvarez blocked Paxton from trying that case?  Well I wonder what would happen if verified criminal complaints are sent to District Judge Mary Lou Alvarez and she doesn't do anything and then the Texas attorney general receives notice of District Judge Mary Lou Alvarez failing to fulfill a ministerial duty under Texas code of criminal procedure.  What do you think Randy K ? I'm thinking maybe a quo warranto or issue mandamus against the judge, but I don't have much to base that off of yet. I have to back this up with statute...but MWUAHAHA: What action can the Texas attorney general take against a judge if the judge fails to fulfil a ministerial duty, or fails to pm take action to suppress or prevent crime, or shields those from prosecution who have been accused of committing crime?The Texas Attorney General can petition a court for a writ of mandamus to compel a judge to perform a ministerial duty that is clearly required by law and involves ...

 Manus is just Claude Sonnet with some other tools. Claude can do the same (and better) with the proper skills: https://github.com/obra/superpowers Here is an example of some counter arguments and responses the agent gave me: ANTICIPATED COUNTERARGUMENT #1: "Chapter 45A authorizes complaints, which serve the same function as informations in municipal court." RESPONSE: This argument fails for three reasons: First, LEGAL DISTINCTION: A complaint is not an information. These are legally distinct instruments:   - Information (Art. 27.03): Filed by prosecuting attorney under oath   - Complaint (Art. 45.019): Filed by "any credible person" Different issuing authority = different legal status. Second, STATUTORY HIERARCHY: Article 27.01 says the primary pleading "IS the indictment or information" - not "complaint." If Legislature intended complaints to substitute for informations in municipal courts, it would have amended Article 27.01 to state: "ex...

 Found it and fixed it, Elise. Thank you and, once again, please support my work and promote my mission to MAKE AMERICA WISE AGAIN. AI is not all that some in these groups think it is. It does not and cannot understand tactics, and it certainly doesn't understand the "secret sauce" that is my unique method for presenting cases, the method that never fails when the law and facts are on your side. AI can only read other documents. It cannot read people, and reading people and preparing for battle is where my work shines. Elise ... Never try to prove your case with the complaint. The discovery phase is where we prove the facts alleged in the complaint, facts the court must take as TRUE when the opposition files a motion to dismiss. Too many in these groups ignore what I say about this, then when their complaint is dismissed the blame the judge. Also, you simply MUST begin to agree with me (and hopefully tell others) that cases are won ON PAPER, not on what you SAY in the cou...

What You Must Know About The America Bar Association   The ABA is the American Bar Association, a private membership organization that advocates for the legal profession that is voluntary to join. In Ohio, the “BAR” is really the equivalent of being licensed by the state to practice law. The Ohio constitution authorizes the Ohio Supreme Court to promulgate rules that govern admission criteria. When one is “admitted” to “the BAR” it means they have met the criteria to practice law (taken the required schooling, passed the BAR exam created by the Supreme Court, etc), not that they have joined the private membership organization known as the ABA or the state or county BAR associations. There is no requirement in Ohio that once a person passes the BAR exam and is there for “admitted” to “the BAR” by becoming licensed that they then must join any of those private organizations. Every state I know of has its own "state bar". In Florida it is regulated somewhat by the Florida Sup...

 roger that, here is a rewrite: Subject matter jurisdiction cannot be presumed, and any action taken without it is void. Garcia v. Dial, 596 S.W.2d 524, 527 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980); Nix v. State, 65 S.W.3d 664, 668 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001); Tex. Ass'n of Bus. v. Tex. Air Control Bd., 852 S.W.2d 440, 443–44 (Tex. 1993); Mapco, Inc. v. Forrest, 795 S.W.2d 700, 703 (Tex. 1990). When jurisdiction is challenged, the burden shifts to the party asserting it — here, the State — to plead facts affirmatively demonstrating that jurisdiction exists. State v. Holland, 221 S.W.3d 639, 642 (Tex. 2007); Tex. Ass'n of Bus., 852 S.W.2d at 446. When jurisdiction is challenged, the Court has an independent duty to verify that jurisdiction has been properly vested before proceeding. State v. Roberts, 940 S.W.2d 655, 657 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996), State v. Medrano, 67 S.W.3d 892, 903 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002). you can insist all you want in the municipal court but they don't follow the law.  You may have...