NJ Transit and Coach USA Death Victims Advocacy

 FYI

 @adrianbraziel63:Is it true when they state THE STATE OF against you the state of does not have original jurisdiction. @PORSHA JUSTICE LEAGUE:Not exactly. When a case says “The State of ___ vs. you,” that just means the government is the prosecuting party it doesn’t mean the court lacks jurisdiction. Jurisdiction comes from the type of court and the law involved, not just how the case is titled. State courts do have jurisdiction over criminal matters that happen within their state. Original jurisdiction simply means the court has the authority to hear the case first, and most criminal cases properly start in state trial courts. So no, that wording alone does not remove jurisdiction or invalidate the case. For education purposes only I’m not an attorney but if you want help understanding jurisdiction in your specific situation, you can email porshajustice8@gmail.com to request the intake form.

 Is this a new case?  Or old If it's new current case.  And you file a reply or appear.  That's a waiver of improper service.    Unless you take other steps to preserve the issue Another approach would be to not show and not answer.    If your correct about the improper service the judge should notice if its obvious. Get a copy from the Court Docket . Scrutinize it for errors in dates, addresses, descriptions, or methods used. Support it with Evidence showing that the Service did not follow court Rules . Check your specific court's Rules . In my mind,I'd focus on the Motion (supported with the above), and shift the burden back to the Plaintiff , who must then prove Service was proper at the Hearing . Now is the time to prepare for battle.    Service will likely be effected sooner or later, and then when that happens you will need to know about what we call The Flurry of Motions:    Motion to Dismiss  ...

 Are you currently a Jurisdictionary Student ? You must have a firm grasp of the basics,to understand how to defend yourself. Jurisdictionary will teach you: #1 ... How to draft proper Pleadings #2 ... How to use Discovery Tools #3 ... How to Move the Court. #4 ... Rules of Evidence #5 ... How, when, and why to use Objections You must also follow the Rules of your court's jurisdiction. Winning is possible, if you understand how to utilize Court Procedure and Evidence Tactics, effectively. http://www.howtowinincourt.com?refercode=LB0034 my thoughts exactly, this part was not done, the defendant only knew a complaint even existed because they started getting solicitations in the mail from other law offices wanting to represent them i figured the next move is either a motion to dismiss for improper service of process, or a notice of inquiry for evidence of proper service Be sure to never try to appeal to a court for empathy, sympathy, or offer excuses. Courts only consider document...

 Joshua Hardeway: I’m in Louisiana and it’s called a Rule NISI. It’s an existing case within the state. Catherine Albertini: I posted a YouTube video in other legal groups today, but can't post it here. I highly recommend that you watch this video which demonstrates the power that one can have in court by following Dr. Graves course. The man who won his case utilized the tactics that the course will teach you. With this knowledge that costs less than a hourLy fee charged by an attorney and taught by Dr. Graves, the knowledge will enable one to turn despair into a weapon of mass destruction. The video is titled "They cut my trees for a better view, so I ruined their view forever." Joshua Hardeway: I do appreciate the help but I have already in my possession the 45 CFR 302.34 cooperative arrangements (contracts) between the 42 USC 654(3) single and separate organizational unit housed in the executive branch and the district courts deeming article 3 judges as contractors for...

 Okay, this is a completely different animal from the complaint. This response to the MTD is significantly better written and much more legally sound. The laches argument is sharp. The distinction between “prejudice caused by the delay” versus “prejudice caused by the relief sought” is a real legal distinction, and he articulated it cleanly. That’s the kind of argument that actually makes judges think. The citation to Mathieu v. Mahoney is appropriate and on point. The circular standing argument is also solid. You can’t strip a plaintiff of standing using the very unconstitutional act he’s challenging. That’s logically tight. The mandamus clarification on page 2 was smart and necessary; essentially saying “call it whatever you want, it’s really declaratory and injunctive relief.” That preempts a purely technical dismissal. The case law citations need verification. I cannot confirm without searching right now whether Fernandez v. Takata, Sears v. Hull, Mathieu v. Mahoney, and Johnso...