NJ Transit and Coach USA Death Victims Advocacy

 Manus is just Claude Sonnet with some other tools. Claude can do the same (and better) with the proper skills: https://github.com/obra/superpowers Here is an example of some counter arguments and responses the agent gave me: ANTICIPATED COUNTERARGUMENT #1: "Chapter 45A authorizes complaints, which serve the same function as informations in municipal court." RESPONSE: This argument fails for three reasons: First, LEGAL DISTINCTION: A complaint is not an information. These are legally distinct instruments:   - Information (Art. 27.03): Filed by prosecuting attorney under oath   - Complaint (Art. 45.019): Filed by "any credible person" Different issuing authority = different legal status. Second, STATUTORY HIERARCHY: Article 27.01 says the primary pleading "IS the indictment or information" - not "complaint." If Legislature intended complaints to substitute for informations in municipal courts, it would have amended Article 27.01 to state: "ex...

 Found it and fixed it, Elise. Thank you and, once again, please support my work and promote my mission to MAKE AMERICA WISE AGAIN. AI is not all that some in these groups think it is. It does not and cannot understand tactics, and it certainly doesn't understand the "secret sauce" that is my unique method for presenting cases, the method that never fails when the law and facts are on your side. AI can only read other documents. It cannot read people, and reading people and preparing for battle is where my work shines. Elise ... Never try to prove your case with the complaint. The discovery phase is where we prove the facts alleged in the complaint, facts the court must take as TRUE when the opposition files a motion to dismiss. Too many in these groups ignore what I say about this, then when their complaint is dismissed the blame the judge. Also, you simply MUST begin to agree with me (and hopefully tell others) that cases are won ON PAPER, not on what you SAY in the cou...

 The ABA is the American Bar Association, a private membership organization that advocates for the legal profession that is voluntary to join. In Ohio, the “BAR” is really the equivalent of being licensed by the state to practice law. The Ohio constitution authorizes the Ohio Supreme Court to promulgate rules that govern admission criteria. When one is “admitted” to “the BAR” it means they have met the criteria to practice law (taken the required schooling, passed the BAR exam created by the Supreme Court, etc), not that they have joined the private membership organization known as the ABA or the state or county BAR associations. There is no requirement in Ohio that once a person passes the BAR exam and is there for “admitted” to “the BAR” by becoming licensed that they then must join any of those private organizations. Every state I know of has its own "state bar". In Florida it is regulated somewhat by the Florida Supreme Court but, like the ABA, it is NOT a governmental...

 roger that, here is a rewrite: Subject matter jurisdiction cannot be presumed, and any action taken without it is void. Garcia v. Dial, 596 S.W.2d 524, 527 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980); Nix v. State, 65 S.W.3d 664, 668 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001); Tex. Ass'n of Bus. v. Tex. Air Control Bd., 852 S.W.2d 440, 443–44 (Tex. 1993); Mapco, Inc. v. Forrest, 795 S.W.2d 700, 703 (Tex. 1990). When jurisdiction is challenged, the burden shifts to the party asserting it — here, the State — to plead facts affirmatively demonstrating that jurisdiction exists. State v. Holland, 221 S.W.3d 639, 642 (Tex. 2007); Tex. Ass'n of Bus., 852 S.W.2d at 446. When jurisdiction is challenged, the Court has an independent duty to verify that jurisdiction has been properly vested before proceeding. State v. Roberts, 940 S.W.2d 655, 657 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996), State v. Medrano, 67 S.W.3d 892, 903 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002). you can insist all you want in the municipal court but they don't follow the law.  You may have...

 So, if you make a declaration, the court is not going to check a pro-se's filings for errors? .... I have a hard time believing that. I would sooner believe that this ruling will protect bar members while allowing those same bar members to challenge a pro-se's filings without any evidence. We all know the courts will protect believe fellow bar members over pro-se litigants in courtroom proceedings..... I stand on my claim that it is a stupid ruling that will do nothing to protect us from bad filings from bar members. I realize I sound cynical, but it is not unwarranted. No, your appellate court case never made it past the gatekeeper to become a formal case. Your petition was denied because it did not meet the threshold that the Appellate Court applies of “extraordinary relief”. There were 2 thresholds that needed to be met: 1) technical - timeliness, and all the right documents filed 2) appropriateness in the Appellate Court which according to the statutes is “extraordinary re...

 https://youtu.be/eF-vHR2IanA Bar members lose citizen-ship upon becoming a member.  They're foreign. They will test you a Wo/man and try to get you to cave.   At this point all you can do is try because you are uncertain what to do. You can try this.  I am woman require you a man (sheriff or deputy) to deliver this instrument/adverse claim to the judge and hand deliver or register mail with witnesses to them a birth certificate. That’s who they are after.   You just agree to be the SURETY and you should be the SUBROGEE and subrogate the entire case   That’s how I would handle it   They can’t do shit to a living Wo/man “if” your status is corrected and they have been NOTICED. 24   order Order on Motion to Dismiss Thu 02/19 3:04 PM ORDER - In light of Plaintiff's amended complaint, ECF No. 23 , the pending motions to dismiss, ECF Nos. 17 , 19 - 21 , are DENIED as moot. Defendants have until March 12, 2026, to file an answer or...