NJ Transit and Coach USA Death Victims Advocacy

 Parking Ticket 

 For Your Information 

 

 United States v. Mitchell (various cases, but see e.g., 405 F. Supp. 2d 602, D. Md. 2005; also referenced in multiple federal filings) Defendant argued "private travel" in a non-commercial vehicle exempts him from licensing/registration. Court rejected it: "The motor vehicle definitions used in 18 U.S.C. § 31 do not apply to plaintiff... Title 18 does not cover the entire subject of motor vehicle regulation... It does not preempt state vehicle registration requirements." Dismissed as meritless. Taylor v. State (Tex. App. 2008, unpublished but cited in later cases) Defendant claimed "non-commercial activity" exempts him from driver's license requirement. Court rejected: "The argument that the license requirement applies only to commercial drivers has been repeatedly rejected as frivolous." Conviction upheld. State v. Booher (Ohio Ct. App. 2001, referenced in multiple sovereign/rights cases) Defendant argued private use of vehicle exempts him ...

 Read Chapter 11 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.  It does not give the judge discretion to deny a writ.  It says s/he must issue the writ. seems you have at least 3 distinct concerns. one is not knowing about the supreme court’s decisions that uphold people’s right to use their own cars on their own roads, and only knowing about their decisions underscoring the fact that we the people, via our legislature, have permitted corporate persons (which have no such rights) to use our roadways as a place of business, provided that they abide by our restrictive regulations and safety rules and so forth. you appear to not yet realize that there is no such thing as “driving a motor vehicle” in a non-commercial capacity. the terms are strictly commercial because inherent rights are not abridged by statutes. rights cannot be regulated. when we read the opinions and holdings of various courts, we must keep this in mind. expansive definitions can only expand as far as the proper scope...

How often does holding a judge accountable for Canon Laws of Misconduct actually work? Cause of Action: Fraud and Swindle by way of threats and coercion.. ??? A well written Pleading may yield a far better result. Remember, you MUST Prove the Elements of your Cause Of Action . Allege & Prove. Essential Facts,Laws that apply to the Facts. Procedures for getting your Evidence on Record . Procedures to keep your opponent from submitting Evidence . And Motions to get the Order you seek. Simple, really. The Jurisdictionary Course teaches you exactly that. Hope this helps. www.howtowinincourt.com?refercode=LB0034  I've been through this at the appeals level. Due to a clerk's  misconduct, and the protectionist racketeering of the bar, found the courts unresponsive. Our Federal district court has a duns # owned by the state bar. At this point I'm looking at the commercial lien process for damages and due process violations, possibly the US court of claims and county sup...