Hey Brandon, appreciate you answering always. Some times these referral-answers help but sometimes the same questions or comments remain even afterwards. This for me is such situation. This is something you keep sending whenever I mention anything federal/state court related and it doesn’t seem to match the situation, mine or the one about the Children (son of Essential ) It’s not easier to win in state court if the state court protects the state agency/agencies etc. If this was my child I’d go full on everything as well and as you can read from Essential s posts, this is a multi-layered case in which, amongst many more things, “winning” wins you effectively nothing (I’ve seen this too but not on his level and not regarding children!) Could it be that in his case, filing 1983 in Federal court is the better option? (it seems to also be in 2 states anyway) It would be much more helpful to stand with him on the 1983 in stead of saying Jurisdictionary teaches state state s...
I'd like to take a second and reflect on how powerful Doc's strategy is on the verified complaint. This is such an underrated tool and it is (in my opinion) the true secret sauce of the Jurisdictionary method. It's a devastating asymmetric neutron bomb. Right out of the gate you dictated that this adversarial war of words is being fought on a chessboard - while the opposing party is playing checkers, which is a structured mismatch from the start. No one wants to file a verified answer to a complaint if they are wrong. It sets up the perfect perjury trap. In my case against Liberty Mutual - I was very careful to plead only facts that I could swear to under penalty of perjury. Those numbskulls had the first of the 4 defendants respond with an unverified answer. Next, they played procedural games to weaponize the Guardian ad Litem for the defendant and used it as a jurisdictional defect for Motion to Dismiss my complaint against this defendan...