Skip to main content

Posts

 I'd be interested in looking at the Case # Please,share it. Perhaps we can use it as a learning lesson for the group Subject: Litigation Debrief – 2025-MR-444 / 2025-EV-1967 – Request for Attorney Review Counsel, My name is Christopher Lawrence McGoldrick. I am seeking help with legal review and potential assistance regarding two related Winnebago County matters: Case No. 2025-MR-444 and Case No. 2025-EV-1967, involving the property located at 4625 Scenic Drive, Rockford, Illinois 61109. I want to provide a clear procedural debrief so you can quickly understand where the cases stand, what happened, and what I believe needs review. I originally filed 2025-MR-444 as a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief action. The case involved disputes concerning my occupancy, the property, claimed authority by Cortez Jamal Houston, rent/payment issues, refusal of tender, notices, and related filings. The eviction case, 2025-EV-1967, was later filed involving the same property and overlappi...
Recent posts
  I received a “strange” copy of a contract the other party (plaintiffs) claim they sent me. That contract doesn’t even have either parties names on it, obviously no signatures etc. How or where do I find the essential elements of getting this to be inadmissible? (I don’t even know if the wording of this question is the right wording, what I see it something any normal person wouldn’t allow in, but I also learned from Jurisdictionary that, that’s exactly NOT how court system works… at least Im there but now I need to write it correctly) It's the rules of evidence.   It's not automaticly admitted.   That's what happens at trial but you should be prepared with the evidence rules Have you taken the evidence class inside the course ? During Discovery, ask them to Authenticate it, identify who created/sent it, produce the "original," explain the missing names/signatures, and provide any chain of custody. *See the Motion & Hearing section of the course ,as wel...

Seeking For Legal Advocacy

 3. Discovery / Requests to Admit    Discovery requests and Requests to Admit were served. To my knowledge, responses were not timely served within the applicable response periods. I am attempting to determine: - the procedural impact of the lack of response; - whether relief should be sought or preserved at hearing; - whether additional filings are strategically advisable; - and how best to address the issue without unnecessarily burdening the Court or over-litigating the docket. 4. Procedural Documentation    I have maintained extensive documentation including: - emails to opposing counsel; - certificates of service; - sheriff service receipts; - filed notices; - hearing notices; - Rule 201(k) certifications; - screenshots of docket entries and ROA history; - and communications relating to counsel appearances and litigation status. 5. Strategic Concerns    One of my primary concerns is proceeding strategically and professionally without: - flooding t...
 Did you get a Notice from the Bank? Did you read the Terms and Conditions of the specific card? People are opting out (in their terms within 60 days of the Notice that they received from Bank of America about their specific cards) but it all depends on your own situation and product(s), and check state-related exception(s) too. Set the Motion to Compel for hearing, if you haven't already.  ⚖️ Court is court, and every court has rules that are published. With the rules and Jurisdictionary's course, you are empowered. Of course they don't want discovery. Discovery is WHERE THE FIGHT IS. Discovery is WHERE YOU PROVE WHO HAS THE RIGHT TO WIN. Force them to submit! Motions to Compel ... You might take a look at the Federal Rules of Procedure and the Federal Rules of Evidence. Fraud gets you out of the conditions in their contract. That train left the station... The motion was filed when I was stupid enough to have retained counsel. An inspection was held and opposing counsel sh...

FYI

 FYI

Fee Waiver

 Fee Waiver 

Rights are found in the Declaration of Rights (Article I) of the New Jersey Constitution, adopted in 1947

  The New Jersey Constitution explicitly states that all political power is inherent in the people, establishing that government exists for their benefit and can be altered by them . It guarantees the right to "alter or reform" government for the public good and grants the power to recall elected officials. [ 1 ] Key aspects of self-governance in the NJ Constitution: Inherent Power & Reform (Article I, Paragraph 2a): "All political power is inherent in the people. Government is instituted for the protection, security, and benefit of the people, and they have the right at all times to alter or reform the same, whenever the public good may require it". Recall Power (Article I, Paragraph 2b): The people reserve the right to recall elected officials (state or federal) after one year of service, provided a petition of at least 25% of registered voters is submitted. Rights of Association (Article I, Paragraph 19): Workers have the right to organize, and public emp...