NJ Transit and Coach USA Death Victims Advocacy

 Hey Brandon, appreciate you answering always. Some times these referral-answers help but sometimes the same questions or comments remain even afterwards. This for me is such situation. This is something you keep sending  whenever I mention anything federal/state court related and it doesn’t seem to match the situation, mine or the one about the Children (son of Essential ) It’s not easier to win in state court if the state court protects the state agency/agencies etc. If this was my child I’d go full on everything as well and as you can read from Essential s posts, this is a multi-layered case in which, amongst many more things, “winning” wins you effectively nothing (I’ve seen this too but not on his level and not regarding children!) Could it be that in his case, filing 1983 in Federal court is the better option? (it seems to also be in 2 states anyway) It would be much more helpful to stand with him on the 1983 in stead of saying Jurisdictionary teaches state  state s...

 I'd like to take a second and reflect on how powerful Doc's strategy is on the verified complaint.  This is such an underrated tool and it is (in my opinion) the true secret sauce of the Jurisdictionary method.  It's a devastating asymmetric neutron bomb.  Right out of the gate you dictated that this adversarial war of words is being fought on a chessboard - while the opposing party is playing checkers, which is a structured mismatch from the start.  No one wants to file a verified answer to a complaint if they are wrong.  It sets up the perfect perjury trap. In my case against Liberty Mutual - I was very careful to plead only facts that I could swear to under penalty of perjury.  Those numbskulls had the first of the 4 defendants respond with an unverified answer.  Next, they played procedural games to weaponize the Guardian ad Litem for the defendant and used it as a jurisdictional defect for Motion to Dismiss my complaint against this defendan...

 Vexing Litigant  Okay I see it now! HAHA. I've been dealing with a lieyer who for the second time since last May has served me  with a motion to declare me a vexatious litigant. I won in the first hearing now he's at it again. I'm going to ask the judge for a restraining order on him at the hearing. I wrote in a federal brief that the castle doctrine is legal. He called the sheriff and filed a report that I threatened him with violence. Then after a court hearing I told someone he was a corrupt criminal. He came tearing around the corner screaming defamation. I laughed and told him if it was the last thing I ever did I was going to put him in prison. He called the sheriff and made another report that I threatened him and said I was going to "get him." He interned for none other than Kamala Harris. I really don't believe he's even an attorney. I was in a pre-trial conference with him once and he said, "Your honor my clients purchased their property in...

 What Is The Definition Of Person In 1979 Black Laws Dictionary? Here's the Black's Law definition (correct me if I'm wrong) - I purposely searched a pre-1970 version of Black law to be safe, if the premise is that the definitions get more corrupt over time... "The exact wording for the definition of "person" in the 4th Edition of Black's Law Dictionary (1951)—the final edition released prior to 1970—is as follows: PERSON. A man considered according to the rank he holds in society, with all the rights to which the place he holds entitles him, and the duties which it imposes. 1 Bouv. Inst. no. 137. A human being considered as capable of having rights and of being charged with duties; while a "thing" is the object over which rights may be exercised. The dictionary further categorizes persons into two types: Natural Persons: "Such as the God of nature formed us; all human beings." Artificial Persons: "Such as are created and devised ...

 Collection Agency  Trying To Collect And Fake Debt By Doctor Dee: I had a private doctor sell his practice to a big medical company, who I have no contract with , and haven't heard from in about 2 years start sending form letters and robo calls to collect something I don't owe, I thought about initiating a complaint , any suggestions for causes of action from those who've been in a similar situation? Catherine Albertini: I'd save my energy for an impactful suit, something to better society. Are you hoping to sue or complain over free enterprise? Businesses can lawfully sell their interests to other businesses. It's called capitalism. You might also want to write to the new owner and demand evidence that you owe them anything and request a copy of your contract with them. End with a request to cease and desist from contacting you short of proof of debt. Right now you have no damages and a suit would be dismissed. No harm, no foul. Dee: I already did that a couple ye...

 What You Should Know About The Bar Association  And   Attorneys So Called License To Practice Law 

 Right To Travel 

 Recuse A Judge  @Locomotive8198:2nd amendment for all foreign and domestic terrorists. . Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer's life if necessary.” Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306 [sic]. This premise was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United United States in the case: John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529 . All are presumed to know the law; If any person acts under any unconstitutional statute, he does so at his own peril; He must take the consequences. 16 Am Jur 177,178 . The government waives its immunity when it violates one of its own statutes. Hollingshead v. US., 85-2 USTC 9772 (5th Cir. 1985) . An officer who acts in violation of the United States Constitution ceases to represent the government. Brookfield Co. v. Stuart, 234 F.Supp. 94 (1964) . Government immunity violates the common law maxim that everyone shall have a remedy for an injury done to his person or property. Firemans Ins. Co. of Newark, NJ v. Washburn County, 85 ...