Skip to main content

 So District Judge Mary Lou Alvarez blocked Paxton from trying that case?  Well I wonder what would happen if verified criminal complaints are sent to District Judge Mary Lou Alvarez and she doesn't do anything and then the Texas attorney general receives notice of District Judge Mary Lou Alvarez failing to fulfill a ministerial duty under Texas code of criminal procedure.  What do you think Randy K ?

I'm thinking maybe a quo warranto or issue mandamus against the judge, but I don't have much to base that off of yet.


I have to back this up with statute...but MWUAHAHA:

What action can the Texas attorney general take against a judge if the judge fails to fulfil a ministerial duty, or fails to pm take action to suppress or prevent crime, or shields those from prosecution who have been accused of committing crime?The Texas Attorney General can petition a court for a writ of mandamus to compel a judge to perform a ministerial duty that is clearly required by law and involves no discretion.
If the judge's conduct constitutes official misconduct, incompetence, willful neglect of duty, or other grounds leading to forfeiture of office under the Texas Constitution (Article V, Section 1-a) or applicable statutes, the Attorney General can initiate a quo warranto proceeding under Civil Practice and Remedies Code Chapter 66 to challenge the judge's right to hold office and seek removal.


I bought and read O'Conner's Law guide (Civil) and found it to be extremely COMPREHENSIVE and not a distillation. When I saw the course through a fellow group member had subbed to, I decided it was not for me. I have law books - but then my preferences is to be able to go to my library and read. The causes with the course did not reflect a fraction of COAs I read in O'Connor's.

Where did I get the tip on O'Connor's?... Randy and Brett's Rule of Law Radio Show. I started at the beginning of the archive, listened and took notes. I found the discussions put terminology in a context that made sense. My opinion and exp.  Everyone has their own personal prefs and metrics on how they learn and process info.

==
Full disclosure: There have been posts over time with people saying they were unclear what to do when the methods in the course have not worked in court. That debate is ongoing.


⚖️🤯🐇Prisons Sue When Empty🤯
Private prison companies have embedded contractual bed quotas that guarantee 90-100 facility occupancy, allowing them to sue states when crime rates drop. This creates a perverse incentive system where companies like GEO Group and CoreCivic view incarcerated people as occupancy units essential for quarterly earnings. Meanwhile, prison gerrymandering artificially inflates rural district populations while inmates are charged Pay to Stay fees, creating an inescapable cycle.

Find it on:
🐇 BurrowTV 🐇 & back on Roku

🐇link:
https://digburrow.com/#/prisons-sue-when-empty


https://rumble.com/v6znl4m-learn-the-constitution-operation-firewall.html


The Attorney General has no standing in a criminal case, only the county or district prosecutor has standing.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62XRy-jFCm8&list=RD62XRy-jFCm8&start_radio=1

a little inspiration from the banks of the Charles River!!!  (yep, I do miss my Boston days, but now enjoy living in the "holy experiment" of PA with Alphonse, lol)


This is important precedence for people like us who fight the government. This allows us (loosely) to challenge the AG representing government rather than the people first as they are suppose to!!!!


Happy Wednesday Everyone!

It’s another opinion day at the Supreme Court, last one of the month. The justices will convene at 10amET to deliver one or more opinions in argued cases.

After that, the justices will hear a case for oral arguments:

1). Pung v. Isabella County - A case involving the government confiscation of private party and the Taking Clause of the fifth amendment.

Arguments begin following opinion announcements, here’s a link to listen live: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New Jersey Rules Of Court

3:2-Contents of Complaints, Arrest Warrant and Summons 3:2-1-Contents of Complaint; Citizen Complaints for Indictable Offenses; Forwarding of Indictable Complaints to Prosecutor and Criminal Division Manager; Forwarding of Investigative Reports to Prosecutor You can read more of the Municipal Courts procedure that the Administrative Judge Law/Municipal Judge Law who is an Administrative Judge. 3:2-2-Summons A summons shall be made on a Complaint-Summons (CDR-1) form, a Uniform Traffic Ticket, a Special Form of Complaint and Summons, or such other form as may be approved by the Administrative Director of the Courts. The summons shall be directed to the person named in the complaint, requiring that person to appear before the court in which the complaint is made at a stated time and place, and shall indicate that there will be consequences for failure to appear at the scheduled first appearance. If the individual fails to appear at that first appearance, a notice shall issue advising the...

NJ Transit bus strikes, kills pedestrian. Another person seriously injured Koran Tajhai Dupree Baker, a 25-year-old Newark

  Another Life Lost to NJ Transit: When Will It End? Early Sunday morning, tragedy struck in Newark when an NJ Transit bus hit two pedestrians, leaving one dead and another seriously injured. According to the Essex County Prosecutor’s Office, the incident occurred at 12:18 a.m. on the 400 block of Springfield Avenue. Koran Tajhai Dupree Baker, a 25-year-old Newark resident, succumbed to his injuries at a local hospital. The second victim remains hospitalized, fighting to recover. Here we are in 2025, and NJ Transit buses continue to take lives under Governor Phil Murphy’s administration. How many more people must be injured or killed before real accountability is enforced? It’s time for action. A class action lawsuit needs to be filed against NJ Transit on behalf of all living victims and the families of those who have lost their lives due to reckless bus drivers. These drivers must be held accountable—this is not just negligence; these are murders on wheels . NJ Transit has ...
 "The federal statutes that force my opponent to comply with discovery are Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, 34, and 37. Rule 34 requires production within 30 days of a request. Rule 37 allows me to file a Motion to Compel if they fail to produce, and authorizes the Court to impose sanctions, award fees, strike their pleadings, or enter default judgment for willful non-compliance. Rule 37(e) also addresses spoliation of electronically stored information including body-worn camera footage and CAD records. In the District of New Jersey, Local Civil Rule 37.1 required me to complete a meet and confer before filing — which I completed on April 30, 2026." If you are trying to compel discovery and don't know what local rules and statutes govern compliance, you are wasting your time, and showing that you might not know what you are doing and aren't credible. This is akin to the tail wagging the dog or putting the cart before the horse. Sending a notice to opposing counsel achieves nothing...