So District Judge Mary Lou Alvarez blocked Paxton from trying that case? Well I wonder what would happen if verified criminal complaints are sent to District Judge Mary Lou Alvarez and she doesn't do anything and then the Texas attorney general receives notice of District Judge Mary Lou Alvarez failing to fulfill a ministerial duty under Texas code of criminal procedure. What do you think Randy K ?
I'm thinking maybe a quo warranto or issue mandamus against the judge, but I don't have much to base that off of yet.
I have to back this up with statute...but MWUAHAHA:
What action can the Texas attorney general take against a judge if the judge fails to fulfil a ministerial duty, or fails to pm take action to suppress or prevent crime, or shields those from prosecution who have been accused of committing crime?The Texas Attorney General can petition a court for a writ of mandamus to compel a judge to perform a ministerial duty that is clearly required by law and involves no discretion.
If the judge's conduct constitutes official misconduct, incompetence, willful neglect of duty, or other grounds leading to forfeiture of office under the Texas Constitution (Article V, Section 1-a) or applicable statutes, the Attorney General can initiate a quo warranto proceeding under Civil Practice and Remedies Code Chapter 66 to challenge the judge's right to hold office and seek removal.
I bought and read O'Conner's Law guide (Civil) and found it to be extremely COMPREHENSIVE and not a distillation. When I saw the course through a fellow group member had subbed to, I decided it was not for me. I have law books - but then my preferences is to be able to go to my library and read. The causes with the course did not reflect a fraction of COAs I read in O'Connor's.
Where did I get the tip on O'Connor's?... Randy and Brett's Rule of Law Radio Show. I started at the beginning of the archive, listened and took notes. I found the discussions put terminology in a context that made sense. My opinion and exp. Everyone has their own personal prefs and metrics on how they learn and process info.
==
Full disclosure: There have been posts over time with people saying they were unclear what to do when the methods in the course have not worked in court. That debate is ongoing.
Private prison companies have embedded contractual bed quotas that guarantee 90-100 facility occupancy, allowing them to sue states when crime rates drop. This creates a perverse incentive system where companies like GEO Group and CoreCivic view incarcerated people as occupancy units essential for quarterly earnings. Meanwhile, prison gerrymandering artificially inflates rural district populations while inmates are charged Pay to Stay fees, creating an inescapable cycle.
Find it on:
https://digburrow.com/#/prisons-sue-when-empty
https://rumble.com/v6znl4m-learn-the-constitution-operation-firewall.html
The Attorney General has no standing in a criminal case, only the county or district prosecutor has standing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62XRy-jFCm8&list=RD62XRy-jFCm8&start_radio=1
a little inspiration from the banks of the Charles River!!! (yep, I do miss my Boston days, but now enjoy living in the "holy experiment" of PA with Alphonse, lol)
This is important precedence for people like us who fight the government. This allows us (loosely) to challenge the AG representing government rather than the people first as they are suppose to!!!!
Happy Wednesday Everyone!
It’s another opinion day at the Supreme Court, last one of the month. The justices will convene at 10amET to deliver one or more opinions in argued cases.
After that, the justices will hear a case for oral arguments:
1). Pung v. Isabella County - A case involving the government confiscation of private party and the Taking Clause of the fifth amendment.
Arguments begin following opinion announcements, here’s a link to listen live: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
Comments
Post a Comment