Found it and fixed it, Elise.
Thank you and, once again, please support my work and promote my mission to MAKE AMERICA WISE AGAIN.AI is not all that some in these groups think it is. It does not and cannot understand tactics, and it certainly doesn't understand the "secret sauce" that is my unique method for presenting cases, the method that never fails when the law and facts are on your side.
AI can only read other documents. It cannot read people, and reading people and preparing for battle is where my work shines.
Elise ...
Never try to prove your case with the complaint. The discovery phase is where we prove the facts alleged in the complaint, facts the court must take as TRUE when the opposition files a motion to dismiss.
Too many in these groups ignore what I say about this, then when their complaint is dismissed the blame the judge.
Also, you simply MUST begin to agree with me (and hopefully tell others) that cases are won ON PAPER, not on what you SAY in the courtroom. Follow the step-by-step method I teach in my course, please.
Pleadings - Discovery - Motions
When your complaint ONLY alleges FACTS, facts the court is obligated to take as TRUE for the purposes of ruling on your opponent's motion to dismiss, YOU GET PAST THE MOTION TO DISMISS.
This seems to escape the small minds of angry people who inhabit these groups.
Do not let it escape yours!
Never try to prove your case with the complaint. The discovery phase is where we prove the facts alleged in the complaint, facts the court must take as TRUE when the opposition files a motion to dismiss.
Too many in these groups ignore what I say about this, then when their complaint is dismissed the blame the judge.
Also, you simply MUST begin to agree with me (and hopefully tell others) that cases are won ON PAPER, not on what you SAY in the courtroom. Follow the step-by-step method I teach in my course, please.
Pleadings - Discovery - Motions
When your complaint ONLY alleges FACTS, facts the court is obligated to take as TRUE for the purposes of ruling on your opponent's motion to dismiss, YOU GET PAST THE MOTION TO DISMISS.
This seems to escape the small minds of angry people who inhabit these groups.
Do not let it escape yours!
I just entered an ex parte to have an order that was created on an unreliable testimony by which then second hand knowledge was used in order to manufacture a cause… well I noticed what happened and filed a motion to vacate not through the domestic violence department (DV forms), but with the Family Law department (FL forms), so they’ll cut DV process to hear the concern of hearsay, perjury, and accepting unreliable testimony from a post-surgical teenager… hearing is set for 3/17/26.
All my facts were laid out on exhibits in the packet of papers. I gave them along with my substitution of attorney, being myself, fee waiver (on public services), and ADA accommodation request (highlighting my specific needs for military service-connected disabilities that require special consideration—these were never filed by former attorney.
Upon the proper forms and made proper declarations listing only the facts with a punch, not too long one page for the motion if it were typed out, 11 exhibits (some with multiple pages)—text message confirming a family meetup, NIH Literature on post-operative cognitive dysfunction (wisdom teeth extraction), my disabilities (to be considered when weighing anything against me), the receipts for the former custody—we’ve been at 50-50 a while, dog receipt (as the owner—he’s under protective order too), and gun turn-in receipt; all items to prove how things were, how they got here, and what needs to be set back due to manufactured testimony, including the CPS investigation taken by investigating that same postoperative boy immediately after his surgery, and his mother even spoke with him in private after his surgery, after which point, they went around interviewing with the agencies and stopping into the court— I entered the CP four 120 and DPSS3167 as evidence that they showed me the investigation documents or at least interviewed me and then gave me a form to accommodate for a special needs, which I have now forwarded to the court and will be giving them a copy as well when I send them a letter saying officially that they have interviewed a postoperative boy. I sent an email already to the social worker on the case along with other documents previously that our son had written of his mother, abusing him at her home last year.
It’s a parent in that statement she’s using fear to control his actions and it’s apparent by her action during postop when fear is high because the cortisol levels she did it again used fear to control his actions and she’s a nurse so she shouldn’t not be ignorant of these chemicals,
and postoperative cognitive dysfunction.
I have an expert witness, my psychologist neurologist that I’m going to subpoena for the ex parte, hearing to give the facts on postoperative cognitive dysfunction, as well as my own service connected disabilities that requires special consideration in all cases taken out against a disabled man on fixed income they already has emotional and mental stress from service aggravated conditions.
Probably why the fee waiver exists for people on public services—to fight when others attempt to talk advantage of their disability pay. without a fee waiver to fight a fraudulent testimony the cost would’ve been over $600 maybe even 800 and nearest thousand just estimating off the prices of the form submissions that I used.
All my facts were laid out on exhibits in the packet of papers. I gave them along with my substitution of attorney, being myself, fee waiver (on public services), and ADA accommodation request (highlighting my specific needs for military service-connected disabilities that require special consideration—these were never filed by former attorney.
Upon the proper forms and made proper declarations listing only the facts with a punch, not too long one page for the motion if it were typed out, 11 exhibits (some with multiple pages)—text message confirming a family meetup, NIH Literature on post-operative cognitive dysfunction (wisdom teeth extraction), my disabilities (to be considered when weighing anything against me), the receipts for the former custody—we’ve been at 50-50 a while, dog receipt (as the owner—he’s under protective order too), and gun turn-in receipt; all items to prove how things were, how they got here, and what needs to be set back due to manufactured testimony, including the CPS investigation taken by investigating that same postoperative boy immediately after his surgery, and his mother even spoke with him in private after his surgery, after which point, they went around interviewing with the agencies and stopping into the court— I entered the CP four 120 and DPSS3167 as evidence that they showed me the investigation documents or at least interviewed me and then gave me a form to accommodate for a special needs, which I have now forwarded to the court and will be giving them a copy as well when I send them a letter saying officially that they have interviewed a postoperative boy. I sent an email already to the social worker on the case along with other documents previously that our son had written of his mother, abusing him at her home last year.
It’s a parent in that statement she’s using fear to control his actions and it’s apparent by her action during postop when fear is high because the cortisol levels she did it again used fear to control his actions and she’s a nurse so she shouldn’t not be ignorant of these chemicals,
and postoperative cognitive dysfunction.
I have an expert witness, my psychologist neurologist that I’m going to subpoena for the ex parte, hearing to give the facts on postoperative cognitive dysfunction, as well as my own service connected disabilities that requires special consideration in all cases taken out against a disabled man on fixed income they already has emotional and mental stress from service aggravated conditions.
Probably why the fee waiver exists for people on public services—to fight when others attempt to talk advantage of their disability pay. without a fee waiver to fight a fraudulent testimony the cost would’ve been over $600 maybe even 800 and nearest thousand just estimating off the prices of the form submissions that I used.
@I5HandsTough the BAR is too far gone at this point, short of pitch forks and torches and the people dragging these scum bags through the streets, there will be no judicial reform as the BAR not only controls the judicial branch, they control the other 2 branches also!
BUT, Randy is spot on and is the only one pursuing a viable option to level the playing field, CLEANING UP THE GRAND JURY PROCESS, which also at present has been usurped by the BAR! Every County DA acts as barrier between the people and the Grand Jury. It's not the DA's job to be deciding what cases the Grand jury persecutes! As it is now the DA is nothing more than a gate keeper! Give the people open access to the grand jury and let the grand jury, uncolored by the DA's influence, decide which cases they want to hand down True Bills for!
BUT, Randy is spot on and is the only one pursuing a viable option to level the playing field, CLEANING UP THE GRAND JURY PROCESS, which also at present has been usurped by the BAR! Every County DA acts as barrier between the people and the Grand Jury. It's not the DA's job to be deciding what cases the Grand jury persecutes! As it is now the DA is nothing more than a gate keeper! Give the people open access to the grand jury and let the grand jury, uncolored by the DA's influence, decide which cases they want to hand down True Bills for!
What an interesting response. It is also interesting that it is coming from an assistant district attorney who is representing a judge who is being sued in her personal capacity. I didn't think that an assistant DA would be able to represent a public official who is being sued in their private capacity for acting outside of the scope of their office under color of law. What do you think Randy K ?
https://realestatemindset.substack.com/p/vexlers-lawsuit-is-interfering-with?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=7136745&post_id=188659118&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=o66tr&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
Comments
Post a Comment