Skip to main content

 Wow this very much sounds exactly similar to what I'm dealing with. I was more interested in the verbiage contained in your complaints.

So how did they manage to try and steal your property? Lawfare is the method of choice out here in California and "trespass" is their favorite cause of action even if you own the property you are supposedly trespassing on.

Trespass and its cousin "nuisance." Feelings were hurt. That's actionable according to those with sensitive feelings.

There are 2 types of nuisance, public and private.. walking on my own property doing nothing wrong is not a private nuisance. The goal was to create a false narrative in order to steal our equity and cover up for serious real property crimes and to commit insurance fraud. The lawyers paid themselves $245,000 after filing fraudulent insurance claim.

So you are saying we have created some kind of public nuisance so they can use the narrative to steal our homes? Equity will not allow a store to be a cloak fraud .

Phone communications are ill-advised, Elise.
Do it in person or on by certified mail return receipt requested.
And STUDY more of my course!


Might be time to for everyone to LEARN THE RULES that are our Key to the Courthouse, Sunny.
Nobody can win if one doesn't know the rules, friend.
Promote Public Legal Education, please.

How were you able to get the email addresses?

But the small letters state that phone calls are the EXCLUSIVE way… how would I even know what address to use when doing certified mail return receipt (which i would have already if that was an option)?


Proving they were driving helps establish Duty, but you still must Prove the other three (3) Elements for a successful Claim.

Study the Evidence section regarding Authentication,in the Jurisdictionary Course.

You are a student,yes?

And sir I had a little more “success” in early court processes and I do my best studying as much as I can. Again, Im more confident in court because of your course and I know it makes all the difference.
Thank you!


> Jax: The deputies not on duty yet performing the duties of a deputy are a big NO! They can be sued! > Jax: This right here is gonna be your downfall. You will not win anything with the so called Patriot mythology/sovereign citizen/admiralty law business.


Everyone in my state has same email address. First.last@kssos.gov : like that. If it’s the court s and thing but ks courts .gov

Just remember public nuisances have to be “in fact” meaning a real public nuisance. IE not just an eyesore.


So you’re not denying my allegations? Yes I will stay in reality.



EDIT:(I failed to attach the previous comment as a reply. This will explain things better for other people reading.)
So let me guess. Since you’re not a citizen and they can’t provide you with a ratified contract, and since they make money out of thin air, resulting in your loan not being a loan at all, but a death pledge because it was not backed by real money, that you were taught that you don’t have any obligation to pay, and so you stopped paying. Is that correct? And so the bank eventually foreclosed on your house, and a new owner took possession and then they evicted you because you overstayed your occupancy in a property you no longer own. Is that close?

Is there a request for facts of findings section on the juris dictionary website?

Facts of findings and conclusions I mean

There isn't a specific section regarding your question.
However,there are references within the course.

What exactly is your objective?



Someday millions of you will realize the Power you seek is at your fingertips. You only have to learn the RULES OF COURT that any 8th grader can learn in a weekend or two.

Blackstone said it many years ago. The Power of the People is in the courts. You’ve allowed the Bar and its lawyers to run the courts that belong to every one of you once you learn the RULES OF COURT instead of imagining the political process will get you what you seek.

Someday millions of you will listen to me and do what I’ve been urging you to do for 30 years. Learn the RULES and force judges and lawyers to play by the RULES.

MAKE AMERICA WISE AGAIN.

Read Washington’s Farewell Address. See what he warned about parties. You can get it on Google. Do this! Do it for your children!

LISTEN TO ME !

Only WE can restore Justice in our nation. Politicians will not do it for us.

Dr. Graves, the first element in a negligence theory is reasonable duty of care owed to the plaintiff. Question regarding a traffic crash: this theory is implied because the defendant was driving and failed to maintain control. All i need to prove is that the defendant was driving the vehicle the day in question to satisfy requirements for the first element correct? The police report should be sufficient and admissible or will it need to be authenticated?


Can't examine a piece of paper. You need a witness to testify about the report
No witness means the report is hearsay and it won't be admitted into evidence

Yes but not needed if the defendant admits to driving in his answer.

Did the paperwork you signed provide for arbitration? Arbitration is not an option unless the contract provided for arbitration. Please carefully read the contract you signed.

Orders are appealable in some situations.
Motions should be stricken with a Motion to Strike, and the Motion to Strike should be set for hearing.

Go to the WORDS" tab at https://www.Jurisdictionary.com and read the entry for "res ipsa loquitur". ⚖️
Jurisdictionary.com

Jurisdictionary ... Defining Justice Since 1997

Everything from the fundamentals of Justice Theory to the practical application of Due Process tools to win legal battles in court.


Long time student. Pleading my first negligence claim. Starting at the top and going down. Would be hard for the defendant to deny driving. simply trying to prepare for anything thrown my way.


Thank YOU, Chris.
You'll find a lot more help at https://www.Jurisdictionary.com
Jurisdictionary.com

Jurisdictionary ... Defining Justice Since 1997

Everything from the fundamentals of Justice Theory to the practical application of Due Process tools to win legal battles in court.


9 U.S. Code § 16(a)(1)(C)
 
-This provision allows an immediate (Interlocutory) Appeal when a court denies a party's request to compel arbitration under Section 206 of the Federal Arbitration Act.

It would appear Angelica has missed the deadline, to file.

*does not apply if the contract did not contain a valid arbitration agreement.

**Always check your States Rules.


Yes it did. It had an extremely broad arbitration clause. For ANY AND ALL DISPUTES we are to go to arbitration. Funny thing im also teying to enforce the exact same contract they are. They argued its too expensive im like, YOU WROTE THE CONTRACT???


And like I mentioned arbitration already deemed i had a valid clause as they accepted my claim but the opposing attorney refused to pay so arbitration closed the case hence why I aubmitted all that evidence to the judge as a motion to dismiss for breach and waiver of their own contract


Did you file a Motion to Compel Arbitration early on in this case, and did you also set it for hearing and notice the other side of the hearing day and time?


Yes and yes the judge denied and the opposing attorney put in a notice of entry and im passed that deadline. He told me he wouldnt dismiss the case due to binding arbitration clause so then I did a compel arbitratjon which he also denied coz he agreed with attorney it would cost too much. So then I commenced arbitration anyway and then they refused to pay so arbitration closed it out and thays when I submitted motion to dismiss for breach and waiver and he also denied. Im feeling like I need to go through the whole case and then appeal at the very end.





I'm considering suing the parking violations bureau in small claims court.
Has anyone tried this?


What's your Cause of Action?


What's your damages? And how did you calculate it. Small claims is limited to a money award only.


Is parking violations bureau registered with the secretary of state? Or is it supposed to be registered ?



You ignored the small claims part of the question. Cause of action don't apply to informal.


One must have a legally valid reason to sue.


Are you setting your motions for hearing, or just filing them and letting the judge rule without giving you an opportunity to argue your motions on the record?


Yes each motion has had a full hearing. And silly me i thought he would actually read my arguments and see through what is going on. Its really kind of my first case. Its really quite ignorant of me to expect the judge to read everything thoroughly.

Im not very good at oral argument( not really fluent in legalese, id be unintentionally like, what do you mean? Its fucking clear in my paperwork, but obvioualy I cant say all that lol) which is why ive relied on my paperwork. And also, my last motion went COMPLETELY UNOPPOSED and the attoemwy even admitted he didnt respond coz he didnt think the judge would take my motion seriously.A couple of things:



My course teaches to keep everything as short as possible. This makes it easier for judges to read and understand what it is you want the judge to do.

My course also teaches to ask the judge if he has read the motion and, if he has not, to read it yourself into the record at the hearing, of course this doesn’t work well if the motion is extremely long and complicated.

The more you study in my course the more you will realize how very important it is to keep things short concise, and to the point.

Hope you have the course, that you are studying it, and that this post is somewhat helpful to you.
Many in these groups have no comprehensive idea of the process or its judge-controlling tactics. I’ve dreamed these 30 years since starting my work that there’d be an uprising of sorts and that the ALL of the American People would learn and teach their friends and neighbors how to control corruption in our highest offices by gaining the comprehensive knowledge that any average 8th grader can learn.

Instead we have individuals who seek only to win their own battles and, for the most part, fumble the ball then blame the judges for their losses.



Yes I used to speak to someone who’s a teacher at a public high school and instead of seeing how I learn from Dr. Graves with short and simple and get retaliatory cases dismissed with Jurisdictionary This is one of the most important things I learned that not only work better but also makes you realize how attorneys make a big mess out of cases adding word after word after word only to lose a winnable case had they just used this alone!

K.i.s.s. keep it simple stupid

(there’s actually more in Jurisdictionary that was important but you get the point🤣)

No kidding. Especially when your attorney happens to be friends with opposing counsel. I handed him a slam dunk divorce case & paid him an insane amount of money & he was more working for his friend & my ex than for me. Definite collusion. Should have never taken my case or lied to me & cause me to lose hundreds of thousands of dollars & leaving me in legal debt. I will definitely be making a complaint to the bar assoc so at least something is on his record. Come to find out another client of his is suing him for same reasons…The code of ethics is a joke if not being upheld.

He TOTALLY made a mess out of my case which was 100% straightforward, yet let my ex get away with contempt & fraud. Unconscionable!
It sounds like it would be unjust enrichment. Natural law is ignored and neglected by many members of the Bar.
No doubt. The “justice” system is highly unjust, rotten to the core & needs massive reforming & strong oversight/accountability. There are many attorneys & judges who should be in jail right now and are not.To be fair, there’s some valuable knowledge that I have gained from some members like Ward Farnsworth and Richard Epstein, both of whom are law professors.

I would recommend either getting some reading material or listening to lectures about political science and game theory. Truth and justice requires logic. We can’t know anything without logic. God is all about wisdom and prudence.








So are you here to complain or to move forward with litigation? I would start by finding which causes of action can be used in this situation, like wrongful representation, breach of contract, breach of client attorney privilege, etc. You may be able to add fraud IFF you have specific particular details that can be alleged, but fraud cannot be inferred or stated in conclusory fashion.

















edited 11:36 PM

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

2024 New Jersey Revised Statutes Title 39 - Motor Vehicles and Traffic Regulation Se"Intersection" means the area embraced within the prolongation of the lateral curb lines or, if none, the lateral boundary lines of two or more highways which join one another at an angle, whether or not one such highway crosses another.ction 39:1-1 - Words and phrases defined.'

2024 New Jersey Revised Statutes Title 39 - Motor Vehicles and Traffic Regulation Section 39:1-1 - Words and phrases defined.' 39:1-1 Words and phrases defined. 39:1-1. As used in this subtitle, unless other meaning is clearly apparent from the language or context, or unless inconsistent with the manifest intention of the Legislature: "Alley" means a public highway wherein the roadway does not exceed 12 feet in width. "Authorized emergency vehicles" means vehicles of the fire department, police vehicles and such ambulances and other vehicles as are approved by the chief administrator when operated in response to an emergency call. "Autocycle" means a three-wheeled motorcycle designed to be controlled with a steering wheel and pedals in which the operator and passenger may ride in a completely or partially enclosed seating area that is equipped with a roll cage or roll hoops, safety seat belts for each occupant, and anti-lock brakes. "Automobile...

Educational Purpose

Educational Purpose 

NJ Transit bus strikes, kills pedestrian. Another person seriously injured Koran Tajhai Dupree Baker, a 25-year-old Newark

  Another Life Lost to NJ Transit: When Will It End? Early Sunday morning, tragedy struck in Newark when an NJ Transit bus hit two pedestrians, leaving one dead and another seriously injured. According to the Essex County Prosecutor’s Office, the incident occurred at 12:18 a.m. on the 400 block of Springfield Avenue. Koran Tajhai Dupree Baker, a 25-year-old Newark resident, succumbed to his injuries at a local hospital. The second victim remains hospitalized, fighting to recover. Here we are in 2025, and NJ Transit buses continue to take lives under Governor Phil Murphy’s administration. How many more people must be injured or killed before real accountability is enforced? It’s time for action. A class action lawsuit needs to be filed against NJ Transit on behalf of all living victims and the families of those who have lost their lives due to reckless bus drivers. These drivers must be held accountable—this is not just negligence; these are murders on wheels . NJ Transit has ...