Skip to main content

THE "HORNBOOK" SERIES.

 THE "HORNBOOK" SERIES

IMPORTANT LAW WORKS.


Stephen's Commentaries on the Laws of England. 

(Partly founded on Br.AOKSThsK) thoroughly Revised and Modernized, and brought down to the present time. , Thii-i^'^'ih- iMii:^,, Tn A «,^l<. .Sjati Price £4 is. ; for Cash, £3 ",.•<. M. *,* litis Work !'.- net for the Infennaliate . " Let tlie stiiileiit reiiiembt'i- that Stephen ' cannot bo t ohtalneil and liiilf the work for the Final is done.'

The Law of Executors and Adr 

Being ^obbins" and Maw's Devolution of ;s^ CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 3 1924 085 504 169Real Jistate and. rzraministration ot : Barriater-at-Law, Third Edition. of Lincoln's Inn Barrisfcer-at-Law, 1901„ Assets:^ By the late L. C4. G. Robbins, Esq, and F. T. M.vw, Esq., of Lincoln's Inn, Price los. ; for Cash, post free, 12s. 5d. "The work is accurate mid up to date."—taic limes. 

Fisher's Law of Mortgage

The Law of Mortgage and other Securities upon Property. By W. R. Fisher, Esq., Barrister-at-Law. Fifth Edition. By A. Underhill, Esq., M.A., LL.D., Barrister-at-Law, Reader in the Law of Real and Personal Property. Price £2 12<. 6rf. ; for Cash, post free, £2 is\ 9cl. 1897. "A perfect mine of accurate learning up a very thorn}- and dilllcult subject, ilr. Underhill has treated it with skill."—LaiP Timrx.


Powell on Evidence. 

Powell's Principles and Practice bWi Evidence Act, 1898. .Seretith E(ktio\ English Law and Jurisprudence M B. A. , Earristers-at-Law. Dei free, 16«. 5d. "An old standartl work." Laif Tim^s. le Law of Evidence, including the Criminal u Bj' .T. Cutler, Q.C.,iI. A., Professor of ling's College, London, and C. F. Cagnet, my 8vo.- Price 20-5'. cloth : for Cash, post 1898.


Fawcett's Law of Landlord and Tenant. 

A Compendium of the Law of Landlord and Tenant. By W. M. Fawcett, Esq., of Lincoln's Inn, Barrister-at-Law. Second Edition. By Jony M. Liuhtwood, Esq. , of Lincoln's Inn, Barrister-at-Law, late Fellow of Trinity Hall, Cambridge, author of "A Treatise on Possession of Land. " Demy 8vo. , 700 pp. Price £1 is. ; for Cash, post free, 17s-. 5d. 1900. "Mr. Lightwood has obviousl.v expended great care on his work."—Zajo Journal. "A valuable book of reference." ^Vlg and Goicn. wm~ 

SENT GRATIS on application, a copy of BUTTERWORTH d CO.'S

Complete Catalogue of English Law Works, 

Together with a complete Chronological List of all the English Reports, with period covered, etc. , with an Alphabetical Table of Abbreviations used in the various Reports and Text Books.


BTJTTEEWORTH & Go. wiU be glad to give Estimates for .supplying Sets, or portions of Sets, of any Eeports that Members of the Legal Profession may require. Being the Publishers of ;Some of the old and valuable Eeports, B. & Co. solicit Orders direct, good and perfect Copies being guaranteed.

PEEFACE. 

TN writing this Manual, it has been my -*- desire to produce a book bearing the same relation to Mr. Lewin's elaborate treatise as Mr. Hawkins' Work on the Construction of Wills bears to that of Mr. Jaeman ; that is to say, a book of a really practical, but at the same time concise, character. The law libraries are rich in great works of reference, the store-houses, so to speak, of the Law ; but they are, in a great measure, merely collections of " that codeless myriad, that wilderness of single instances," from which it requires many years of study and experience to extract general principles. That this is so was vigorously expressed by the late Sir James FiTZJAMES Stephen in the preface to his Digest of the Law of Evidence, where he said : "It becomes obvious, that if a lawyer is to have anything better than a familiarity with indexes, he must gain his knowledge in some other way than from existing books on the subject. 

No doubt such knowledge is to be gained. Experience gives by degrees, in favourable cases, a comprehensive acquaintance with the principles of the law with which a practitioner is I.T. o, 4 Vlll PEEFACB. conversant. 

He gets to see that it is shorter and simpler than it looJcs, and to understand that the innumerable cases, which at first sight appear to constitute the law, are really no more than illustrations of a comparatively small number of principles." That great lawyer, the late Sir Geoege Jessel, also pointed out that " the only use of authorities or decided cases is the establishment of some principle which the judge can follow out in deciding the case before him" 

(a). Now, in this Work I have endeavoured to extract and formulate the principles of the law of Private Trusts, and, by way of example, have quoted or referred to all the important modern decisions, and a fair collection of the more ancient ones. Thus the reader is enabled to see, at a glance, the law (i.e., the principle) governing any particular point, and then he is further presented with a series of decided cases which prove, illustrate, and explain the application of that principle. I have chosen modern cases in preference to ancient ones, because, as has been truly said, "the rules of Courts of Equity are not, like the rules of the Common Law, supposed to have been established from time immemorial. It is perfectly well known that they have been established from time to time—altered, improved

 {a) L. R., 13 Ch. D. 712. PREFACE. IX and refined from time to time. The doctrines are progressive, refined and improved ; and if we want to Jcnow what the rules of Equity are, we must look rather to the more modern than the more ancient cases " (6).

 Since the last Edition was issued the Judicial Trustees Act, 1896, has been passed, and its provisions will be found discussed in

Chapter VIII. of Division IV. Although the present Edition contains fewer pages than the last, nothing essential has been struck out. The change is due in fact partly to an alteration in the type and size of the page, and partly to increased brevity in the statement of the illustrations. For the reasons above stated, it is hoped and behoved that this will prove a useful work to practitioners in both branches of the Legal Profession. But, in addition to practitioners, there is the large class of students. I do not expect that they will be able to remember all the illustrative cases ; but I am sure that the fact of these being somewhat numerous will not render the Work less useful to them, but will rather tend to elucidate any difficulties which they might feel in the application of the principles which those cases exemplify. A person of ordinary industry

 (h) Per Sir Geo. Jessel, M.R., in Re Hcdlett, KnatchbuU v. Hcdlett, L. R., 13 Ch. D.,atp. 710. a 5 PEEFACE. and capacity can easily master the eighty-two Articles of this Work, and may, without great effort, remember the main facts of such of the illustrative cases as are specially named in the body of the text, and are what may be called "leading"; and when he has done so I have no doubt that he wiU possess such knowledge of the principles upon which the court acts with regard to Private Trusts, as will enable him to pass his examination without difficulty, and to answer all such questions as occur in the every-day experience of a general practitioner. Lastly, I have to thank my friend and colleague, Mr. J. A. Scully, of the Middle Temple, Barrister-at-Law, and Eeader in Equity in the Inns of Court, for Notes on Constructive Trustees, with special reference to Confidential Agents, which he has kindly placed at my disposal, and which have been of great assistance in the preparation of this Edition. AETHUE UNDEEHILL. 5, New Square, Lincoln's Inn, W.C. May, 1901. TABLE OF CONTENTS. PAGE Pbbpace vii Table OF Contents xi Table OF Cases CITED xvii Table OP Statutes CITED Ixiii DIVISION I.—

PRELIMINARY DEFINITIONS. 

Art. page 1. —Definitions of Trust, Trustee, Trust Property, Beneficiary, and Breacli of Trust 1 2. —Definitions of Legal and Equitable Estates 6 3.—Definitions of Declared (or Express) and Constructive Trusts ... 8 4.—Definitions of Simple and Special Trusts 10 DIVISION II.—DECLARED OR EXPRESS TRUSTS. Chapteb I. Inteoduction. 5.—Analysis of a Declared or Express Trust 12 

Chaptee II.—Mattees essential to the peima facie Validity of an Expeess Teust. 6. —Language evincing an intention to create a Trust ... 14 7.—Of Illusory Trusts 24 8.—How far Valuable Consideration necessary to bind Settlor or his Representatives 27 xii TABLE OF CONTENTS. Aet. P-^-GB 9._Wliat Property is capable of being made the subject of a Trust 39 10.—The Legality of the expressed object of the Trust ... 43 11.—Necessity or otherwise of "Writing and Signature 52 

Chaptbe III. Validity op Declabed Teusts in EELATION TO LATENT MatTBES. 12.—Who may be a Settlor 59 13.—Who may be Beneficiaries 62 14.—When Voidable for Failure of Consideration, Mistake, or Fraud 66 15.—When Void as against Settlor's Creditors under 13 Eliz. c. 5 74 16.—When Void under Bankruptcy Act 85 17.—When Void as against subsequent Purchasers from Settlor 89 

Chaptee IV. The Consteuction op Dbclaked Teusts. 18.—Executed Trusts construed strictly, and Executory liberally 94 DIVISION III.- CONSTRUCTIVE TEUSTS. 

Chaptee I. Inteoduction. 19.—Analysis of Constructive Trusts 101 

Chaptbe II. Eesulting Teusts. SO.—Where Equitable Interest not wholly disposed of ... 103 21.—Resulting Trusts, where Trusts declared are Illegal ... 108 22.—Eesulting Trusts, wherePurchase made in Another's Name 113 23.—To whom Property results 119 TABLE OP CONTENTS. XUl ChAPTEB III.—CONSTEUCTIVB TeUSTS WHICH AEB NOT EbSULTING. Art. page 24.—Constructive Trusts of Profits made by Persons in. Fiduciary Positions 125 25.—Constructive Trusts where Equitable and Legal Estates are not united in the same Person 128 DIVISION IV.—THE ADMINISTRATION OF A TRUST. ChAPTEE I.—DiSCLAIMEE AND ACCEPTANCE OP TeUSTS. 26.—Disclaimer of a Trust '134 27.—Acceptance of a Trust 136 

Chaptbe II. The Estate op the Teusteb, and ITS Incidents. 28.—Cases in whicli the Trustee takes any Estate 139 29.—The Quantity of Estate taken by the Trustee of Lands ... 143 30.—Bankruptcy of the Trustee 149 31.—The Incidents of the Trustees's Estate at Law 150 32.—Trustee's Estate on total Failure of Beneficiaries ... 152 

Chaptbe III. The Teustee's Duties. 33.—Duty of Trustee on acceptance of Trust 154 34.—Duty of Trustee to obey the Directions of the Settle- ment 156 35.—Duty of Trustee to act impartially between the Beneficiaries 160 36.—Duty of Trustee to sell Wasting and Reversionary Pro- perty 37.—Duty of Trustee, as between Tenant for Life and Re- mainderman in relation to Property pending Conversion which ought to be converted, where conversion is delayed 170 38.—Duty of Trustee in relation to the jjayment of Outgoings out of Corpus and Income respectively 178 165 XIV TABLE OF CONTENTS. Abt. page 39.—^Duty of Trustee to exercise reasonable Care 188 40.—Duty of Trustee in relation to the Investment of Trust Funds 200 41.—Duty of Trustee to see that he pays Trust Moneys to the right Persons 217 42.—Duty of Trustee not to delegate his Duties or Powers ... 220 43.—Duty of Trustees to act jointly where more than one . . . 234 44.—^Duty of Trustee not to set up jMS t«rfii 238 45.—Duty of Trustee to act gratuitously ... ... ... 240 46.—Duty of Trustee not to traffic with or otherwise profit by Trust Property 243 47.—Duty of Trustee to be ready with his Accounts 252

Chapter IV. The Powebs of the Teustee. 48.—Gteneral Powers of Trustees 256 49.—Power of Trustees in relation to the conduct of Sales ... 264 50.—Power of Trustees to give Receipts 266 51.—Power to compound and to settle Disputes ... ... 267 52.—Power to allow Maintenance to Infants ... ... ... 269 53.—Power of Trustees to pay to Attorney appointed by Beneficiary 271 54.—Suspension of the Trustee's Powers by Administration Action 272 

Chaptee V. Power op the Benefeciasies. 55. —Power of the Beneficiaries in a Simple Trust 275 56.—Power of the Beneficiaries collectively in a Special Trust 276 57.—Power of one of several Beneficiaries partially interested in a Special Trust 280 

Chapter VI. The Death, Eetiebment, or Eemoval op a Trustee, anb the bppect thereof in Relation TO the Office of Trustee. 58.—Survivorship of the Office and Estate 284 59.—Devolution of the Office and Estate on Death of the Survivor ... ... ... ... ... 285 60. —Retirement or Removal of a Trustee 290 61. —Appointment of new Trustees 294 62.—Vesting of Trust Property in new Trustees 309 63.—Severance of Trust on appointment of new Trustees ... 319 

TABLE OP CONTENTS. XV 

Chapter VII. The Eights of Teustees. Art. Pj^qj, 64.—Right to Reimbursement and Indemnity 320 65. —Right to Discharge 328 66.—Right to take Direction of a Judge 330 67.—Right to pay Trust Funds into Court under certain Cir- cumstances 33X 68.—Right under certain Circumstances to have the Trust administered by the Court 334 

Chaptee VIII. Appointment op a Judicial Teusteb. 69.—Power of Court to appoint 338 DIVISION v.—THE CONSEQUENCES OF A BREACH OF TRUST. 

Chaptee I. The Liability op the Teustees. 70.—The Measure of the Trustee's Responsibility 341 71.—The Liability, Joint and Several 348 72. —No Set-off allowed of Gain on one Breach against Loss on another 349 73.—Property acquired either wholly or partly out of Trust Property becomes liable to the Trust 351 74.—Any of the Beneficiaries may compel Performance of a neglected Duty, or prevent the Commission of Breach : 356 75. —Fraudulent Breach of Trust is a Crime 358

Chaptee II. Peotection accoeded to Teustees in Case op Beeach op Teust. 76.—Gsneral Protection where they have acted Reasonably and Honestly 359 77.—Statute of Limitations 362 78.—Protection against the Acts of Co-Trustee 367 79.—Concurrence of or Release by the Beneficiaries 369 XVI TABLE OP CONTENTS. Art. page 80.—Trustees generally entitled to Contribution inter se, but may be entitled to be Indemnified by Co-Trustee or Beneficiary who instigated Breach 374 

Chaptbe III. Liability of Thied Parties and Benepiciaeies. 81.—Liability of Third Parties or Beneficiaries who are Parties to a Breach of Trust 382 82.—Following Trust Property into the Hands of Third Parties 390 INDEX. TABLE OF CASES CITED. A. PAGE Abbott's Trust, Re, Smith v. Abbott, [1900]

 2 Ch. 326 105 Aberamaa Ironworks v. Wickens, 

4 Ch. App. 101 ... ... ... 132 Aberdeen Rail. Co. !>. Blackie, 1 Macq. 461 127 '— Town Council ». Aberdeen University, 2 App. Cas. 541 : 243, 248 Ackland v. Lutley, 9 A. & E. 879 ; 8 L. J. Q. B. 164 ... 143, 147 Ackroyd v. Smithson, 1 Bro. C. C. 503 103, 107, 120, 121 Acton V. Woodgate, 2 My. & K. 495 ; 3 L. J. Ch. 83 ; 39 R, E. 251 : 25 Adames «. Hallett, 6 Eq. 468 79 Adams, Re, 12 Ch. D. 634 291, 297, 304 Re, Adama r. Adams, [1893] 

1 Ch. 329 ; 62 L. J. Ch. 266 ; 68L. T. 376 270,271 , Re, and Perry, 68 L. J. Ch. 259 ; 47 W. R. 326 ; SO L. T. 149 : 141 , Re, and Kensington Vestry, 

27 Ch. D. 394; 32 W. K. 883 : 15, 18, 22 r. Clifton, 1 Russ. 297 220 Addlington v. Cann, 3 Atk. 141 53, 113 Agar V. George, 2 Ch. D. 706 ; 24 W. R. 696 ; 34 L. T. 487 ... 20 Akerman, Re, Akennan v. Akerman, [1891]

 3 Ch. 212 ; 61 L. J. Ch. 34 ; 65 L. T. 194 ; 40 W. R. 12 386—389 Akeroyd, i?e, Roberts «. Akeroyd 105 Alcock 13. Sloper, 2 My. & K. 697 ; 39 E. R. 334 168 Alexander r. Duke of Wellington, 2 Russ. & M. 35 ; 34 E. E. 1 ... 43 Alford, i?e. Hunt -!). Parry, .32 Ch. D. 382 262 Allan. Re, Havelock v. Havelock, 

17 Ch. D. 807 ; 29 W. R. 859 ; 44L. T. 168 262 AUcard v. Skinner, 36 Ch. D. 145 ; 36 W. R. 251 ; 56 L. J. Ch. 1052 66,68,71,74 V. Walker, [1896] 

2 Ch. 369 ; 65 L. J. Ch. 660 ; 74 L. T. 487;44W. R. 66 388 Allen, Re, Havelock v. Havelock-AUan. 12 T. L. R. 299 193 f. Bewsey, 

7 Ch. D. 453 ; 37 L. t. 688 ' 40,43 V. Jackson, 1 Ch. D. 399 ; 24 W. E. 306 ; 45 L. J. Ch. 310 ; 33L. T. 713 44, .50,52 «). Seckham, 

11 Ch. D. 795 ; 48 L. J. Ch. 611 397 Allhueen f. Whittell, 4 Eq. 295 ; 36 L. J. Ch. 929 ; 16 L. T. 695 ... 180 Alsbnry, Re, Sugden v. Alsbury, 45 Ch. D. 237 162 Alton V. Harrison, 4 Ch. App. 622 ; 17 W. E. 1034 ; 20 L. T. 1001 : 84 Alwyn, iie, 16 Eq. 585 48 Ambler, iJe, 59 L. T. 206 299 Ames, Re, Ames v. Taylor, 25 Ch. D. 72 ; 32 W. R. 287 241 «. Parkinson, 7 Beav. 379 201 Ancketill, i?e, 27 L. R. Ir. 331 178 Andersons. Elsworth, 3 Giff. 154 66 Andrews, Re, 

7 Ch. D. 635 ; 26 W. R. 572 ; 38 L. T. 137 85 t!. Weall, 37 W. R. 779 179 XVIU TABLE OF CASES. PAGE Angibau, ^e, 15 Ch. D. 222 28 Anon, 8 W. E. 333 ; 2 L. T. 71 187 , 6Madd. 11 195,358 , Com. Rep. 43 391 Anstis, Be, Chetwynd r. Morgan, 31 Ch. D. 606 28, 39, 38 Antrobus !-. Smith, 12 Ves. 39 ; 8 E. E. 278 28,36 Arbuthnot r. Norton, 5 Moo. P. C. C. 219 43 Armitage, Re, Armitage v. Garnett, [1893] 3 Ch. 337 163 Armstrong v. Reeves, 25 L. R. Ir. 325 65 r. Timperou, W. N. (1871), p. 4 35 Arnold r. Chapman, 1 Ves. sen. 108 ... ... ... ... ... 113 f. Gamer, 2 Ph. 231 130 Amould V. Grinstead, 21 W. E. 155 207 Ashby 1-. BlackweU, 2 Eden, .302 217,218 V. Costin, 21 Q. B. D. 401 34, 39 Assets, etc. Co. r. Trustees, etc. Corporation, 65 L. J. 

Ch. 74 ; 44 W. E. 126 ... ... 291 Astleyr. Miiies, I'sim. 298; 27R. E.'i'90 '.!'. '.'.'. ''. ... 131 Aston, Be, 23 Ch. D. 217 295 Atkins, Be, Newman r. Sinclair, 81 L. T. 421 258 Atkinson v. Atkinson, 62 L. T. 735 23 Att.-Gen. ». Alford, 4 De G. M. & G. 851 ; 19 Jur. (N.s.) 361 ; 24 L. T. 265 ; 3 W. R. 200 341, 342, 345, 346 V. Aspinal, 2 My. & Cr. 613 ; 7 L. J. (n.s.) Ch. 51 ; 45 R. E. 142 60 V. Dangars, 33 Bear. 624 374 V. Downing, Amb. 552 ... ... ... ... ... 19 (Lady), Wils. 21, 22 19 r. Gore, Barn. 150 275 f. Gower, 2 Eq. Ca. Abr. 685, pi. 11 391 V. Jacobs-Smith, [1895] 2 Q. B. 341 ; 64 L. J. Q. B. 609... 31 V. Murdoch, 2 K. & J. 571 328 v. Owen, 10 Ves. 560 260 T. Sands, Hard. 491 43 r. Scott, 1 Ves. sen. 413 225 r. Stephens, 3 My. & K. 347 19 !). Wilson, Cr. & Ph. 28 ; 47 R. R. 173 348,374 Austen, iJe, 38 L. T. 601 307 «. Taylor, 1 Eden, 366 94,96 Austin r. Austin, 4 Ch, D. 233 ; 25 W. E. 346 ; 46 L. J. Ch. 92 • 36L. T. 96 256 Ayeline v. Melhuish, 2 D. J. & S. 288 ; 12 W. E. 1020 ; 10 Jur. (n.s.) 788 ..-; 369 Aveling r. Knipe, 19 Ves. 441 ; 13 E. E. 240 115 Arery ». Griffin, 6 Eq. 607 ; 18 L. T. 849 308 Ayerst r. Jenkins, 16 Eq. 283 ; 21 W. E. 878 ; 29 L. T. 126 : 109, 111 AylifEe v. Murray, 2 Atk. 58 240 Aylwin's Trusts, Be, 16 Eq. 585 ; 21 "W. E. 864 ; 28 L. T. 865 ... 281 Backhouse r. Backhouse, Lew.. 678 19 Bacon, Be, Grissell i: Leathes, 68 L. T. 522 ; 62 L. J. Ch. 247 68 L. T. 1.55 ; 41 W. E. 478 180 Badderley v. Badderley, 9 Ch. D. 113 ; 26 W. R. 850 ; 38 L. T. 906 -36 38 Bagnall r. Carlton, 6 Ch. D. 371 ; 36 L. T. 750 127 Bagot, Be, [1894] 1 Ch. 177 " 281 282 

TABLE OF CASES. 

XIX PAGE Bagshaw v, Spencer, 1 Ves. 144 147 Bahin v. Hughes, 31 Ch. D. 390 ; 55 L. J. Ch. 472 ; 54 L. T. 188 ... 375, 377, 378 Bailey f. Gould, 4 You. & Coll. Ex. 221 198 Balnbrigge v. Browne, 18 Ch. D. 188 ; 29 W. K. 782 ; 50 L. J. Ch. 522 ; 44 L. T. 705 72 Baker ('. Monk, 33 Beav. 719 70 -y^ i*eck 9 W R 472 248 V. White, 1 Bing. N. C. 573; 20 Eq. 166 ; 44'l. J. Ch. 65i'; 23 W. R. 670 ; 33 L. T. 847 140, 142 Baldwin v. Bannister, cited in Robinson v. Pett, 3 P. Wm. 251 ... 130 Bank of Australasia i: Murray-Aynsley, [1898] A. C. 693 : 67 L. J. P. C. 123 ..: „. ... ... 393 Barber, Be, 39 Ch. D. 187 317 Barclay, Se, Barclay i: Andrew, [1899] 1 Ch. 674 ; 68 L. J. 

Ch. 383 ; SOL. T. 702 342—344 «. Owen, 60 L. T. 220 164 Baring, Me, Jeune i\ Baring, [1893] 1 Ch. 61 ; 62 L. J. Ch. 50 ; 67 L. T. 702 ; 41 W. R. 87 179,186 Barker, ^a!^arte, 28 W. R. 522; 42L. T. 411 351 , Re, 

1 Ch. D. 43 ; 24 W. R. 264 ; 45 L. J. 

Ch. 52 ... 291, 297 He, Ravenshaw v. Barker, 77 L. T. 712 ; 46 W. R. 296 ... 350, 359, 360 x;. Greenwood, 4 M. & W. 429 ; 8 L. J. Ex. 5 140 i. Peile, 2 Dr. & S. 340 ; 13 "W. E. 573 ; 12 L. T. 50 : 293, 337 Barlow r. Grant, 1 Vern. 255 262 Barnard I'. Bagshawe, 3 De G. J. & S. 355 237 Barnes r. Addy, 9 Ch. App. 244 133,198,384 Bamett v. Sheffield, 1 De G. M. & G. 371 387 Barney, Me, Barney v. Barney, [1892] 2 Ch. 265 133, 382, 384 Barrack v. McCuUock, 3 Kay & J. 110 ; 5 W. R. 38 ; 26 L. J. Ch. 105 ; 28 L. T. 218 75 Barratt ti. Wyatt, 30 Beav. 442 218 Barrett, Me, Whitaker v. Barrett, 43 Ch. D. 70 ; 59 L. J. Ch. 218 ; 38W. R. 57 274 -v. Hartley, 12 Jur. (N.S.) 426 ; 14 "W. R. 684 ; 14 L. T. 474 : 240, 242 Barron 1J. Wilhs, [1900] 

2 Ch. 121 72,251 Barrow c. "Wadkin, 24 Beav. 1 ; 5 W. R. 695 ; 3 Jur. Cn.S.) 679 ... 62 Barrs 1). Fewkes, 2 Hem. & M. 60 104 Barry, ^K^arte, 17Eq. 113; 22 W. R. 205 149 Barton, Me, 5 Eq. 238 160 V. Briscoe, Jac. 603 277 Basham, JJe, Hannay «. Basham, 23 Ch. D. 195 328 Bassett v. Nosworthy, 2 W. & T. L. C. 150 ; Einch, 102 391 Bastard v. Proby, 2 Cox, 6 Bate V. Hooper, 5 De G. M. & G. 338 388 Bateley !;. Windle, 2 Bro. C. C. 31 104 Bateman i). Davis, 3 Madd. 98 ; 18 R. E. 200 158 1). Hotchkin, 10 Beav. 426 45 Batho, Me, 39 Ch. D. 189 ; 58 L. J. Ch. 32 ; 59 L. T. 882 ... 305, 315 Bathurst, i?e, 2 Sm. & G. 169 Batstone v. Salter, 10 Ch. App. 431 Beale v. Symonds, 16 Beav. 406 Beattie r. Curzon, 7 Eq. 194 ; 17 W. E. 132 ; 38 L. J. Ch. 161 20L. T. 61 Beauclerc, .Be, 11 W. E. 203 V. Ashbuinham, 8 Beav. 322 Beaufoy, Me, 1 Sm. & GifE, 20 h 2 295 115 153 334 332 209 169 XX TABLE OF CASES. FAQE Beaumont v. Salisbury (Marquis), 19 Beav. 198 113, 145 Beck t-. Kantorowiez, 3 Kay & J. 230 127 Beekford r. Beekford, LofCt. 490 114, 119 f. Wade. 17 Ves. 97 ; 11 K. E. 20 366 Beckley J). Newland, 2 P. Wms. 182 41 Bective (Lord) v. Hodgson, 10 H. L. Gas. 656 ; 12 W. R. 625 : 122, 271 Beddoes 1-. Pugh, 26 Beav. 407 239,240,325 Bedford (Duke) v. Abercorn (Marquis), 1 My. & Cr. 312 ; 5 L. J. (N.S.) Ch. 230 ; 43 B. R. 200 97 !). Coke, 2 Yes. sen. 116 109 Bedillon v. Seatou, 3 Wall. jun. 279 56 Beeeher r. Major, 2 Dr. & Sm. 431 119 Begbie v. Crook, 2 Bing. N. C. 70 135 Behrens, Be, W. N. (1888), p. 95 331 Belchier, :Ea; parte, Amb. 219 221, 225, 227, 231, 233, 236 Bell, Be, Jeffery v. Sayles, 65 L. J. Ch. 188 ; 73 L. T. 391 ; 44 W. R. 99 280 , Be, Lake i: Bell, si'ch. 0.462 ..'. .'.'. ... ... 132, 366 V. Barnett, 21 W. R. 119 127 1). Cureton, 2 My. & K. 511 25 «. Turner, 47 L. J. Ch. 75 328 Bellamy and Metropolitan Board, Be, 24 Ch. D. 387 ; 31 W. R. 900 ; 48L. T. 801 220,228 Bellasis, Be, 12 Eq. 218 ; 19 W. R. 699 ; 24 L. T. 466 35 Bellinger, Be, Durell v. Bellinger. [1898] 2 Ch. 534 ; 67 L. J. Ch. 580 ; 79 L. T. 54 ... ' 261 Belliss, Be, 5 Ch. D. 594 ; 25 W. R. 456 ; 46 L. J. Ch. 353 ; 86 L. T. 644 , 288 Benbow v. Townsend, 1 My. & K.'506 ; 2 L. J. Ch. 215 ; 36 R. R. 359 52,108 Bence, Be, Smith v. Bence, [1891] 3 Ch. 242 44 v. Gilpin, L. R. 3 Ex. 76 ; 16 W. R. 705 ; 37 L. J. Ex. 36 ; 17L. T. 655 137 Bendyshe, Be, 3 Jur. (N.s.) 727 ; 5 W. R. 816 261, 333 Beningfield v. Baxter, 12 App. Cas. 167 247 Benn v. Dixon, 10 Sim. 636 ... 166 Bennet v. Bennet, 10 Ch. D. 474 118, 119 Bennett, £a! ^art«, 10 Ves. 393; 8 R.R. 1 244,249,250 V. CoUey, 5 Sim. 192 ; 2 My. & K. 225 ; 35 R. R. 135 ... 357 f. Davis, 2 P. Wms. 216 19,150 V. Gas Light and Coke Co., 52 L. J. Ch. 98 ; 48 L. T. 156 : 245 !). Wyndham, 4 De G. & J. 257 221,321 Bennison, Be, Cutler v. Boyd, 60 L. T. 859 159 Bentham v. Haincourt, Pr. Ch. 30 130 Benyon t. Nettlefold, 3 Man. & G. 102 -... no Berkeley (Earl), .Re, 10 Ch. App. 56 187 Berry i>. Berry, 7 Ch. D. 657 ; 47 L. J. Ch. 182 ; 26 W. R. 327 ... 147 V. Gibbons, 8 Ch. App. 747 ; 21 W. R. 754 ; 29 L. T. 88 : 272, 273 Bethell r. Abraham, 17 Eq. 24, per Jessel, M.R. ; 22 W. R, 179 ; 43 L. J. Ch. 180 ; 29 L. T. 715 207,208,273 Betjemann «. Betjemann, [1895] 2 Ch. 474 129 252 Betty, Be, [1899J 1 Ch. 821 ; 68 L. J. Ch. 435 ; 80 L. T. 675 : 179, 181, 185 Bevan, Be, 34 Ch. D. 716 46 Biddulph r. Williams, 1 Ch. D. 203 ... ..[ 104 Biggs «. Peacock, 22 Ch. D. 284 "' 278 Bignold, Be, 7 Oh. App. 223 ; 26 L. T. 176 ; 41 L. J. Ch. 235";' 21W. R.345 291,297,300,304 

TABLE OF CASES. 

XXI PAGE Billingsley r. Critchett, 1 B. C. C. 268 2K2 Billson V. Crofts, 15 Eq. 314 ; 21 W. K. 50i ; 42 L. J. Ch. 531 48, 281 Bindley v. MuUoney, 7 Eq. 343 ; 17 W. R. 510 ; 20 L. T. 283 ... 50 Bingham r. Clanmoms, 2 Moll. 253 135 Binney r. Ince Hall Co., 35 L. J. Ch. 363 2.34,236 Birch ('. Blagi-ave, Amb. 264 109, 112, 115 r. Wade, 3 V. & B. 198 ; 13 E. E. 181 22 Birchall, Be, Birchall %: Ashton, 40 Ch. D. 436 ; 37 W. R. 387 ; 60L. T. 369 135,136 Bird, Be, 16 Eq. 203 ; 3 Ch. D. 214 ; 21 W. E. 725 ; 28 L. T. 658 : 143, , iJe, Pitman «). Pitman, [ 1892] 1 Ch. 279 124 !•. Maybery, 33 Beav. 351 ... 23 Birks V. Micklethwait, 33 Beav. 409 ; 34 L. J. Ch. 362 ; 10 Jur. (n.s.) 302 323,374 Birt c. Birt, 

11 Ch. D. 772 352 Bishop, Exparte, 8 Ch. App. 718 ; 21 W. R. 716 ; 28 L. T. 862 ...85, 87 Bizzey i>. Might, 24 W. E. 957 32,34 Blackburn ». Stables, 2 V. & B. 367 ; 13 R. R. 120 98 Blacklow V. Laws, 2 Hare, 40 159 Bladwellr. Edwards, Cro. Eliz. 509 44,49 Blagrave r. Blagrave, 4 Ex. 550 ; 19 L. J. Ex. 414 146 Blagrove t'. Handcock, 18 Sim. 378 100 Blake, iSe, W. N. (1887), p. 173 ; 60 L. T. 663 108,297 , Be, Jones v. Blake, 29 Ch. D. 913 256, 258, 334, 335 i. Power, 37 W. R. 461 70 Blakeley Co., Be, 3 Ch. App. 154 ; 16 W. R. 533 ; 37 L. J. Ch. 418 ; 18L. T. 132 .391 Blaker «. Anscombe, 1 Bos. & P. N. E. 25 ; 8 E. R. 746 143 Blandy ». De Burgh, 6 C. B. 634 29 Bleazard 1). Whalley, 2 Eq. Rep. 1093 ; 2 W. R. 608 261 Blount V. O'Connor, 17 L. R. Ir. 620 207 Blue -y. Marshall, 3 P. W. 381 191 Blnndell, Be, Blundell v. Blundell, 44 Ch. D. 1 ; 40 Ch. D., p. 370 : 133 323 349 384 393 Blyth I'. Pladgate, [1891] 1 Ch. 337 ' 348' 375,' 382^ 385 Bodmin (Lady) !). Vanderbendy, 1 Vern. 179 391 Boldero v. London and Westminster Discount Co., 5 Ex. D. 47 ; 28 W. R. 154 ; 42 L. T. 57 84 Bolland, Sxparte, Clint, Be, 17 Eq. 115 ; 22 W. R. 152 ; 43 L. J. Bk. 16;29L. T. 545 81 Bolton V. Curre, [1895] 1 Ch. 544 ; 64 L. J. Ch. 164 ; 71 L. T. 752 ; 43W. E. 521 381,383 Bond I'. WaKord, 32 Ch. D. 238 66,69 Bone «. Pollard, 24 Beav. 285 114,117 Booth V. Turle, 16 Eq. 182 ; 21 W. R. 721 58, 133 Bostock V. Ployer, 1 Ch. App. 26 ; 1 Eq. 29 ; 14 W. R. 120 ; 35L.J. Ch. 23;13L. T. 489; llJar. (N.S.) 962 ... 218,228 Bosworth, Be, Martin v. Lambe, 58 L. J. Ch. 432 253, 255 Bouch, Be, Sproule n. Bouch, 12 App. Cas. 385 ; 36 W. R. 193 : 160—162 Bonghton ». James, 1 Coll. 26 47 Bonrke, i?e, 2 D. J. & S. 426 316 Boursot V. Savage, 2 Eq. 134 ; 35 L. J. Ch. 627 ; 14 W. R. 565 ; 14L. T.299 391,395 Bowden, Be, Andrew v. Cooper, 45 Ch. D. 444 ; 59 L. J. Ch. 815 ; 39W. R. 219 363 Bowen D. Phillips, [1897] 1 Ch. 174 357 XXll 

TABLE OF CASES. 

PAGE Bowes r. East London Water Co., Jac. 32i 256,260 1). Strathmore (Earl), 8 Jur. 92 261 Bowles r. Stewart, 1 Sch. & Lef. 226 370 Boyd, Me, U Ch. D. 626 ; 28 W. R. 233 ; 42 L. J. Ch. 506 213 r. Boyd, 4 Eq. 305 ; 15 W. B. 107 ; 16 L. T. 660 262 Boyes, iZe, Boyes «. Carritt, 26 Ch. D. 531 53,54,107 Boyle, i?e, 1 M. & G. 495 249 Brakenbnry r. Brackenbury, 2 J. & W. 391 ; 22 K. R. 180 109 Bradford Bank i: Brlggs, 12 App. Cas. 27 ; 35 W. R. 521 ; 56 L. J. Ch. 364;56L. T. 62 236 Bradley v. Riches, 9 Ch. D. 189 ; 26 W. R. 910 ; 38 L. T. 810 ... 395 Brail, Se, Exparte Norton, [1893] 2 Q. B. 381 ; 62 L. J. Q. B. 457 ; 41 W. R. 623 86 Brandlyn «. Ord, 1 Atk. 571 398 Brandon v. Robinson, 18 Ves. 429 ; 11 R. E. 226 44, 49, 281 Braybrooke r. Inskip, 8 Ves. 436 ; 7 E. E. 106 288 Breeds, i?e, 1 Ch. D. 226 ; 24 W. R. 200 ; 45 L. J. Ch. 191 262 Brentwood, etc., Co., Re, 4 Ch. D. 562 ; 25 W. R. 481 ; 46 L. J. Ch. 554 ; 36 L. T. 343 129 Breton ». Woollven, 17 Ch. D. 416 ; 29 W. R. 777 ; 50 L. J. Ch. 906 36,38 Brewster «. Angell, 1 J. & W. 625 97 Brice v. Stokes, 2 Wh. & Tu. 633 ; 11 Ves. 319 ; 8 E. E. 164 188, 221 , 236, 237, 369 Bridge, iJe, 56 L. J. Ch. 779 331 r. Brown, 2 Y. & C. C. C. 181 261 Bridgman r. Gill, 24 Beav. 302 384 Brier, iJe, Brier ». Evison, 26 Cb. D. 238 222,232 Brierley, Ee, 43 W. E. 36 21 Briggs,^e,andSpicer,[1891]2Ch.381; 64L.T.187; 60L.J.Ch.514: 86 ». Jones, 10 Eq. 92 90 ». Maasey, 30 W. E. 325 ; 51 L. J. Ch. 447 ; 46 L. T. 354 ... 343 r. Penny, 3 M. & G. 546 ; 3 De G. & S. 547 22, 53 Bright t'. North, 2 Ph. 220 256,259 Brinton D. Lulham, 53 L. T. 9 125,245 Brinsdeu r. Williams, [1894] 3 Ch. 185 ; 63 L. J. Ch. 713 ; 71 L. T. 177 ; 42 W. E. 700 384, 385 Brogden, Be, Billing v. Brogden, 38 Ch. D. 546 ; W. N. (1888), p. 238 ; 59 L. T. 650 190-193, 268, 308 Brooke, Be, Brooke v. Brooke, [1894] 1 Ch. 43 ; 63 L. J. Ch. 159 ; 70 L. T. 71 ; 42 W. E. 186 141,147 !). Haynes, 6Eq.25 137 Brooker ^. Pearson, 37 Bear. 181 48 Brooks, Be, Coles v. Davis, 76 L. T. 771 ... ... ... 164 165 Brougham (Lord) v. Ponlett, 19 Beav. 135 ' 179 Brown, iJe, 27 Beav. 324 277 , J!e, Brown, 29 Ch. D. 889 ... ... ..'. ..'. ..'. 207 .ife, Dixon r. Brown, 32 Ch.D. 597 389 V. Brown, 7 Eq. 185 ; 17 W. R. 98 ; 38 L. J. Ch. 153 ; 19 L. T. 594 70 »• Burdett, 21 Ch. D. 667 ; 31 W. R. 854 ; 48 L. T. 753 ... 65 V. De Tastet, Jac. 284 ; 23 R. R. 59 ; 28 R. R. 25 243 V. Gellatly, 2 Ch. App. 751 ; 15 W. E. 1188 170, 172, 175 '• Higgs, 4 Ves. 708 ; 4 R. R. 323 15 V. How, Bam. 354 ' 275 E. Litton, 1 P. W. 140 240 243 ». Sibley, 24 W. E. 783 "" '288 v. Smith, W. N. 1878, p. 202 " 257 TABLE OP CASES. XXIU PAGE Brown v. Whiteway, 8 Hare, 145 148 Browne D. Collins, 12 Eq. 586 162 Brumridge ». Brumridge, 27 Beav. 5 367 Bryant, He, Bryant v. Hickley, [1894] 1 Ch. 324 ; 63 L. J. Ch. 197 : M^^ 70 L. T. 311 ; 42 W. E. 183 258 , ^e, and Barningham, 44 Ch. D. 218 159 Brydges v. Brydges, 8 Ves. jun. 125 94 Bubb V. Padwick, 13 Ch. D. 517 ; 28 W. R. 382 ; 49 L. .J. Ch. 128 ; 41L. T. 116 277 Buchanan «. Hamilton, 5 Ves. 722 291 Buckeridge ^). Glasse, 1 Cr. & Ph. 134 ; 10 L. J. Ch. 134 ... 136,369 Buckland ^). Pocknell, 13 Sim. 499 129 Buckmaster v. Buckmaster, 35 Ch. D. 21 ; 35 W. R. 438 ; 56 L. T. 795 ; 56 L. J. Ch. 379 60 Bueknill (;. Morris, 52 L. T. 462 207 Budge V. Gummon, 7 Ch. App. 719 ; 20 W. R. 1022 ; 42 L. J. Ch. 22;27L. T. 666 214 Bullock, Re, Good v. Lickoriah, 64 L. T. 736 ; 60 L. J. Ch. 341 ; 64L. T. 736;39 W. R. 472 282 ,r. BuUock, 56 L. J. Ch. 221 188 Bulmer ». Hunter, 8 Eq. 46 83 Bnlwer !>. Astley, 1 Ph. 422 180 Burdick v. Garrick, 5 Ch. App. 233 ; 18 W. E. 387 ; 39 L. J. Ch. 369 181, 132, 341, 342, 345, 366 Bnrdon i). Burdon, 1 V. & B. 170 242 Bnrges B. Lamb, 16 Ves. 174 161 Burgess I!. Wheate, 1 Edw. 595 43,152 Burnaby f. Griffin, 3 Ves. 206 97 Burnett u. Mann, 1 Ves. 156 60 Bumey i;. Macdonald, 15 Sim. 6 58 Buron ^|. Husband, 4 B. & Ad. 611 40 Barrage, Me, Burrage v. Bumingham, 62 L. T. 752 25S Burrough i;. Philcox, 5 My. & Cr. 72 15,20 Burrowes r. Lock, 10 Ves. 470 ; 8 E. R. 33, 856 220, 255 Burrows v. Walls, 5 D. M. & G. 253 ; 3 W. R. 327 ; 25 L. T. 18 : 252, 369 Burton, Jte, Banks «. Heaven, [1892] 2 Ch. 38 270, 271 t: Hastings, Gill. Eq. Rep. 118 97 Burtt, JSe, 1 Brew. 319 289 Bush u. Allen, 5 Mod. 63 143,146 Butler i: Butler, 7 Ch. D. 116 ; 26 W. E. 85 ; 47 L. J. Ch. 77 ; 37L. T. 518 246,247,865,375,378 r. Gray, 5 Ch. App. 26 21 Buttanshaw v. Martin, John. 89 ; 38 L. T. 300 ; 5 Jut. (N.s.) 647 : 277, 281 Butterworth, He, Russell, JEai parte, 19 Ch. D. 538 79, 80, 327 Buxton V. Bnxton, 1 My. & Cr. 98 ; 43 R. E. 138 189, 197 Byles, Be, 1 Ch. D. 282 19 Byrne f. Norcott, 13 Beav. 366 327 Cabburn, .Be, 46 L. T. 848 334 Cadell V. Palmer, Tud. L. C. Conv. 578 ; 1 CI. & P. 372 ; 36 R. R. 128 1M5 Cadett r. Earl, 5 Ch. D. 710 ; 46 L. J. Ch. 798 207 Cadogan v. Essex (Lord), 2 Drew. 227 209 Cafe i>. Bent, 5 Hare, 36 !»'' xxiv TABLE OF CASES. I'AGE Calvin's Case, 7 Eep. 49 .„ Cambridge r. Bonse, 8 Ves. 24 : 6 K. R. 199 *° Camden (Marq.) c. Murray, 16 Ch. D. 161 f° Camejron, Re, 26 Ch. D. 19 i*; »e, Cameron r. Cameron, [1893] 3 Ch. 468 247 and Wells, Be, 37 Ch. D. 32 ; 36 W. E. 5 31 Camoys (Lord) r. Best, 19 Beav. 414 ^^° Campbell t-. Bainbridge, 6 Eq. 269 .ok oa 7 ill r. Walker, 5 Ves. 680 ; 5 E. E. 135 195,24^249 Candler r. TiUett, 22 BeaT. 257 J„o' ooa Cann r. Cann. 51 L. T. 770 198, 2di Caplin, i?«, 2 Dr. & Sm. 527 ^^ Carberry «. McCarthy, 7 L. R. Ir. 328 j^ Carew r. Cooper, 10 Jur. (N.S.) 429 ** Carlyon, Me, 35 W. R. 155 •• • ^^^ — V. Tmscott, 20 Eq. 348 ; 44 L. J. Ch. 186 ; 32 L. T. 50 ; 23W.R.302 ^"'hl Carpenter, iJe, Kay, 418 ™^ Carr, i?e, Carr r. Carr, 36 W. R. 688 23b Carrick v. Errington, 2 P. Wms. 361 lH Carruthers T. Carnithers, [1896] A. C. 659 221,23/ Carson r. Sloane, 13 L. R. Ir. 139 38^ Carter, ^e. 41 W. E. 140 1'2 and Kenderdine, [1897] 1 Ch. 776 ; 66 L. J. Ch. 408 ; 76 L. T. 476 ; 13 T. L. E. 314 ; 45 W. E. 484 86 V. Carter, 3 Kay & J. 617 ; 27 L. J. Ch. 74 ; 30 L. T. 349 ; 4 Jur. (N.S.) 63 *00 V. Seabright, 26 Bear. 376 321 Cartwright, Be, Aris ». Newman, 41 Ch. D. 532 183 i: Cartwright, 3 D. M. & G. 982 43 Case r. James, 3 D. F. & J. 256 397 Castle 1-. Castle, 1 De G. & J. 352 23 Caswell V. Sheen, W. N. (1898), 187 313 Cater, Be, 25 Beav. 366 329 Cave V. Cave, 15 Ch. D. 639 ; 49 L. J. Ch. 656 ; 43 L. T. 158 ... 7, 90, 391, 395 Cawthome, Be, 12 Beav. 56 332 Cecil r. Langdon, 28 Ch. D. 1 298 Chadwick i). Heatley, 2 Coll. 137 328,329 Challen v. Shippam, 4 Hare, 555 233 Chambers i: Chambers, 2 Eq. Ca. Abr. 35, c. 4 97 V. Goldwin, 9 Ves. 267 ; 7 E. E. 181 ; 8 ib. 61 241 i;. Howell, 11 Beav. 6 252 V. Minchin, 7 Ves. 196 ; 6 E. E. Ill 220 Chancellor «. Brown, 26 Ch. D. 42 167 Chandler v. Bradley, [1897] 1 Ch. 315 ; 66 L. J. Ch. 214 ; 75 L. T. 581 ; 45 W. E. 296 246 Chapman, Be Cocks i: Chapman, [1896] 1 Ch. 323 ; 2 Ch. 763 ; 65 L. J. Ch. 892 ; 75 L. T. 196 ; 45 W. E. 67 191, 201 Chappie, Be, Newton v. Chappie, 27 Ch. D. 584 ; 33 W. R. 235 ; 51L. T. 748 241 Charles ^. Jones, 33 Ch. D. 80 323 Chasten, Be, 18 Ch. D. 218 277 Chennell, Be, Jones v. Chennell, 8 Ch. D. 492 213. 323 Chertsey Market, Be, 6 Pr. 285 ; 20 R. R. 638 223 Chesterfield (Earl), Be, 24 Ch. D. 643 171, 177 ». Janssen, 2 Ves. 158 370 Child V. Child, 20 Beav. 50 208 TABLE OP CASES. XXV PAGE Childers r. Childers, 1 D. & J. 482 ; 5 W. R. 586 ; 26 L. J. Ch. 743 ... 109 ChiUingworth i\ Chambers, [1896] 1 Ch. 685 ; 65 L. J. Ch. 343 ; 74 L. T. 34 ; 44 W. E. 388 244, 365, 375, 376, 378, 382 Chippendale, J?a!jparfe, 4 De G.M.& G. 19 321 Chisholm, He, 43 Sol. J. 43 340 Christie •«. Gosling, 1 H. L. 543 98 ». Ovington, 1 Ch. D. 279 ; 24 W. E. 204 286, 287 Christ's Hospital !). Grainger, 1 Macn. & G. 460 45 Chnrcher r. Martin, 42 Ch. D. 312 ; 37 W. R. 682 ; 61 L. T. 113 ... 366 Clare r. Clare, 21 Ch. D. 865 328 Clart r. Girdwood, 7 Ch. D. 9 ; 26 W. R. 90 ; 47 L. J. Ch. 116 ; 37L. T. 614 66 r. Hoskins. 32 L. J. Ch. 561 199 «. Malpas, '31 Beav. 80 70 r. Swaile, 2 Eden, 134 250 Clarke, i?e, Coombe r. Carter, 36 Ch. D. 348 20,41 ;;. Tranklin, 4 Kay & J. 257 123 r. Wright, 6 H. & N. 849 ; 30 L. J. Ex. 115 ; 4 L. T. 21 ; 9 W. R. 571 31 Clarkson «. Robinson. [1900] 2 Ch. 722 241 Clay D. RnfCord, 5 De G. & S. 768 196 Clegg i>. Edmonston, 27 L. T. 117 ; 3 Jur. (U.S.) 299 372 ;;. Eishwick, 1 M. & G. 294 127 Clement-s, Re, Clements v. Bearsall, [1894] 1 Ch. 665 ; 63 L. J. Ch. 326 ; 70 L. T. 682 ; 42 W. R. 374 271 Clergy Orphan Corporation, i?e, 18 Eq. 280 201 Cleveland (Dnke of). Re, Hay v. Wolmer, [1895] 2 Ch. 542; 65 L. J. Ch. 29 ; 73 L. T. 313 ... ., 171,177 Clint, Re, BoUand, JEx parte, 17 Eq. 115 ; 22 W. R. 152 ; 43 L. J. Bk. 16 ; 29 L. T. 545 81 CUre V. Carew, 1 J. & H. 199 ; 7 W. R. 433 ; 33 L. T. 161 380 Clongh %. Bond, 3 My. & Cr. 497 ; 8 L. J. Ch. 51 ; 45 R. R. 314 ... 220, 221, 235, 237 V. Dixon, 10 Sim. 564 285 Clowes v. HiUiard, 4 Ch. D. 413 ; 25 W. R. 224 ; 46 L. J. Ch. 271... 356 Coard J). Holdemesse, 20 Bear. 147 104 Coates and Parsons, JJe, 34 Ch. D. 370 ; 35 W. R. 375 ; 56 L. J. Ch. 242;56L. T. 16 296 Cochrane r. Moore, 25 Q. B. D. 57 37 Cock t>. Goodfellow, 10 Mod. 489 207,209 Cockbum D. Edwards, 18 Ch. D. 455 251 V. Peile, 3 D. E. & J. 170 ; 9 W. E. 725 ; 30 L. J. Ch. 575 ; 4L. T. 571 211 Cockcroft v. SntcUffe, 25 L. J. Ch. 313 328 Cockerill «. Cholmeley, 1 R. & M. 425 ; 36 E. E. 16 369 Cocksedge v. Cocksedge, 14 Sim. 244 43 Cogan V. Duffield, 2 Ch. D. 44 ; 24 "W. R. 905 ; 45 L. J. Ch. 307 ; .34 L. T. 593 95 v. Stephens, 5 L. J. (N.s.) Ch. 17 ; 42 E. R. 258 : 120, 122, 123 Coggs t>. Bernard, 1 Sm. L. C. 177, 6th ed 4 Cogswell «. Cogswell, 2 Edw. Ch. 231 184 Colchester «. Lowton, 1 V. & B. 226 ; 12 R. E. 216 60 Colev. Muddle, 10 Hare, 186 387 Coleman, Re, Henry v. Strong, 39 Ch. D. 443 220, 277, 282 V. Backs, etc. Bank, [1897]

 2 Ch. 243 ; 66 L. J. Ch. 564 ; 76 L. T. 684 ; 45 W. E. 616 355,393 Coles ». Trecothick, 9 Ves. 247 ; 7 R. E. 167 244, 250 Colgan, Be, 19 Ch. D. 305 262 XXVI 

TABLE OP CASES. 

PAGE Collier i: M'Beaii, 34 Beav. 426 96, 400 - 1: Walters, 17 Eq. 262 ; 22 W. R. 209 ; 43 L. J. Ch. 216 ; 29L. T. 868 ... 149 Collins, Be, Collins v. ColHns, 32 Ch. D. 229 ; 55 L. J. Ch. 672 ; 55 L. T. 21 ; 34 W. R. 650 262, 270 II. Collins, 31 Beav. 346 129 t'. Collins, 2 My. & K. 703 168 CoUyer i;. Isaacs, 19 Ch. D. 342 20,40,41,85,88 Colmore (,. TyndaU, 2 Y. & J. 605 143,144 Colombine v. Penhall, 1 Sm. & G. 228 83 Colyear r. Lady Mulgrave, 2 Kee. 81 ; 5 L. J. (N.s.) Ch. 335 ; 44R. E. 191 28 Combs, Me, 51 L. T. 45 317 Consterdine v. Consterdine, 31 Beav. 330 ; 31 L. J. Ch. 807 ; 10 W. R. 727 235,237 Conway r. Fenton, 40 Ch. D. 512 ; 58 L. J. Ch. 282 ; 59 L. T. 928 ; 37W. R. 156 181 Conyngham !). Conyngham, 1 Ves. sen. 522 137 Cook V. Addison, 7 Eq. 466 ; 17 W. E. 480 ; 38 L. J. Ch. 322 ; 20L. T. 212 351,355 r. Hutchinson, 1 Kee. 42 ; 44 R. R. 11 104 Cooke, Ux parte, 4 Ch. D. 123 ; 46 L. J. Bk. 52 ; 25 W. R. 171 ; 35L.T.649 132,352 , Me, 4 Ch. D. 454 ; 25 W. R. 218 ; 46 L. J. Bk. 34 ; 35 L. T. 715 284,285 ». Crawford, 13 Sim. 91 ; 11 L. J. Ch. 406 289,290 r. EuUer, 26 Beav. 99 277,281 «. Lamotte, 15 Beav. 234 66 Cookson f. Lee, 23 L. J. Ch. 478 248 1;. Reay, 5 Beav. 22 278 Coombes ». Brookes, 12 Eq. 61 304 Cooper and Allen, Se, 4 Ch. D. 817 ; 25 W. E. 301 ; 46 L. J. Ch. 133 ; 35 L. T. 890 194, 195, 227, 233, 264. 265, 280 V. Kynock, 7 Ch. App. 398 ; 20 W.E. 503 ; 41 L. J. Ch. 299 ; 26L. T. 566 143,144 c. Macdonald, 7 Ch. D. 292 ; 26 W. E. 377 ; 47 L. J. Ch. 373 ; 38 L. T. 195 282 1-. Todd, 29 W. R. 502 319 Copland, i2e, Johns i;. Carden, [1900] 1 Ch. 326 179,181 Coppard, iJe, 35 Ch. D. 350 46 Coppring r. Cooke, 1 Ver. 270 130 Cordall's Case, Cro. Eliz. 316 143,147 Cordwell v. Maekrill, Amb. 515 ; 2 Eden, 344 392 Cornmell v. Keith, 3 Ch. D. 767 ; 24 W. E. 633 ; 45 L. J. Ch. 689 ; 35 L T 29 .. ... ... .. 20 Cornish, He', [1896] 1 Q. B. 99 '.'.'. '.'.". ..'. ..'. ... ... 362 Cornthwaite v. Prith, 4 De G. & S. 552 25 Corsellis, Be, Lawton d. Elwes, 34 Ch. D. 675 ; 55 L. J. Ch. 675 ... 241, 242, 246 Costabadie «. Costabadie, 6 Hare, 410 257 Costello V. O'Rourke, 3 Ir. Eq. Rep. 172 161 Cotham V. West, 1 Beav. 381 257,262 Cothay v. Sydenham, 2 Bro. C. C. 391 218 Cottam -o.East Coast Rail. Co., 1 John. & H. 243 238 Cottington v. Fletcher, 2 Atk. 156 , 109 Cotton, Be, 1 Ch. D. 232 ; 24 W. E. 243 ; 45 L. J. Ch. 201 ; 33 L. T. 720 : 269 Cotton's Trustees and London School Board, Be, 19 Ch. D. 627 ; 30 W. R. 610 ; 51 L. J. Ch. 514 ; 46 L. T. 813 ... 275, 278, 279 

TABLE OF CASES. 

XXVll PAGE Coulson, iJe, 4 Jnr. (N.s.) 6 332 Courtier, lie, Coles v. Courtier, 34 Ch. B. 136 ; 35 "W. R. 85 ; 56 L. J. Ch. 350 ; 55 L. T. 574 179, 184, 185, 199, 258 Coutts V. Acjcworth, 8 Eq. 558 ; 17 W. E. 1121 ; 38 L. J. Ch. 694 67,68 Coventry v. Coventiy, 1 Kee. 758 ; 6 L. J. (Sf.s.) Ch. 275 ; 44 R. R. 169 293 Cowel r. Gatcombe, 27 Beav. 568 220 Cowin I'. Graven, 34 W. R. 735 252 Cowley (Earl) v. Wellesley, 1 Eq. 656 186 Cowper !). Stoneham, 68 L. T. 18 348,383,384 Cox V. Page, 10 Hare, 163 14 Crabb r. Crabb, 1 My. & K. 511 ; 3 L. J. Ch. 181 ; 36 R. R. 362 ... 115 Cradock r. Piper, 1 M. & G. 664 242 Craven v. Brady, 4 Ch. App. 296 ; 17 W. R. 505 ; 38 L. J. Ch. 345 44 i-. Craddoek, W. N. (1868), 229 157 Creaton v. Creaton, 3 Sm. & G. 386 ; 5 W. R. 125 ; 26 L. J. Ch. 266 ; 2 Jur. (N.S.) 1223 141 Cresswell ?). DeweU, 4 Giff. 465 369 Crichton v. Crichton, [1895] 2 Ch. 853 ; 65 L. J. Ch. 491 ; 74L.T. 357 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 369 374 Crockett «. Crockett, 2 Ph. 553 ' 23 Croome «. Croome, 61 L. T. 814 105,106 Cropton t'. Davies, L. R. 4 C. P. 159 147 Crosby i;. Church, 3 Beav. 485 380 Cross, Be, Harston v. Tenison, 20 Ch. D. 109 ; 30 W. R. 376 ; 51 L. J. Ch. 645 ; 45 L. T. 777 371 Crossley u. Elsworthy, 12 Eq. 159 79 Crouch V. Credit Poncier, 8 Q. B. 374 ; 21 W. R. 946 391 Crowe, Be, 14 Ch. D. 610 ; 28 W. E. 885 305, 315 Crowther, Be. Midgley v. Crowther, [1895] 2 Ch. 56 ; 64 L. J. Ch. 537 ; 72 L. T. 762 ; 43 W. R. 571 167,172 f. Elgood, 34 Ch. D. 691 131,132 Croxton 1J. May, 9 Ch. D. 388 279 Coll, Be, 20 Eq. 561 ; 23 W. R. 850 ; 44 L. J. Ch. 664 ; 32 L. T. 853 : 219 328 332 333 Cunard, Be, 10 Ch. D. 29 ; 27 "W. E. 164 : 40 L. T. 52 .'.. ' 307*, 319 CunltfEe v. Brancker, 3 Ch. D. 393 ; 46 L. J. Ch. 148 ; 35 L. T. 578 146 Cunnack v. Edwards, [1896] 2 Ch. 679 ; 65 L. J. Ch. 801 ; 75 L. T. 122 • 45 W. R. 99 ... ... ... ... ... ... 107 Cunningham and Erayling,'if«, [is'g'l] 2 Ch. 567 "; 60 L. J.'ch. 59l"; 64 L. T. 558 ; 39 W. R. 469 286,289 — J). Foot, 3 App. Cas. 974 14,103 Cumick f. Tucker, 17 Eq. 320 23 Currant D. Jago, 1 Coll. 261 114,119 Currie, Be, 10 Ch. D. 93 317 !;. Nind, IMy.&Cr. 17 89 Curteis, Be, 14 Eq. 220 ; 41 L. J. Ch. 631 ; 26 L. T. 863 ... 114, 115 !). Wormald, 10 Ch. D. 172 ; 27 W. R. 419 ; 40 L. T. 108 : 220 123 Curtis, .He, 5 Eq. 422 307 V. Perry, 6 Ves. 739 ; 6 E. E. 28 109 i!. Price, 12 Ves. 89 ; 8 E. E. 303 143,145 Cusackr. Cusack, 5Bro. P. C, Tom. ed. 116 96 Cutler «. Boyd, 60 L. T. 859 217 XXvili TABLE OF CASES. D. PAGE D'Adhemar r. Bertrand, 35 Beav. 19 303 Dale, Ex paHe, 11 Ch. D. 772 ; 27 W. E. 815 ; 48 L. J. Ch. 600 ; 40L. T. 712 354 Dalgleish, Be, 4 Ch. D. 143 ; 25 W. E. 122 ; 85 L. T. 829 ... 305, 315 D'Almaine ?). Moseley, 1 Dr. 629 104 Dance r. Goldingham, 8 Ch. App. 902 ; 21 W. E. 761 ; 29 L. T. 166 ; 42L.J. Ch. 777 195,.S56, 358 Dangar, Re, 41 Ch. D. 178 ; 37 W. E. 651 ; 58 L. J. Ch. 315 ; 60L. T. 491 385 Daniel II. Warren, 2 Y. & C. C. C. 290 168 Daniell, Be. 1 Ch. D. 375 ; 24 W. E. 227 ; 45 L. J. Ch. 105 ; 34 L. T. 308 66 Danson, iJe, 48 W. E. 73 302,304 Dartnall, Be, Sawyer r. Goddard, [1895] 1 Ch. 474 ; 64 L. J. Ch. 341 ; 72 L. T. 404 ; 43 W. E. 644 254 Darville r. Terry, 6 H. & N. 807 84 Danbeny ». Cockbnrn. 1 Mer. 638 75 Davenport V. Bishopp,' 2 You. & Coll. 451 28 Dayeron, Re, Bowen x. Churchill, [1893] 3 Ch. 421 278 Davidson D. Kempton, 18 Ch. D. 213 279 Davies, Be, 16 Jur. (U.S.) 882 187 , Be, Davies v. Davies, 38 Ch. D. 210 331 , Be, Davies v. Davies, [1892] 3 Ch. 63 34, 39 , Be, Ellis V. Eoberta, [1898] 2 Ch. 142 ; 67 L. J. Ch. 507 ; ' 79L. T. 344 j 365 to Jones and Evans, 24 Ch. D. 190 141 -c. Davies, 9 Eq. 468 ; 18 W. E. 634 ; 39 L. J. Ch. 343 ; 22L. T.505 66,73 V. Davies, 4 Beav. 54 96 V. Hodgson, 25 Beav. 177 ; 6 "W. E. 355 ; 27 L. J. Ch. 449 ; 31L. T. 49 ... 218 1). Hodgson, 32 Ch. D. 225 295 V. Otty, 35 Beav. 208 109, 112, 119 «. Westcombe. 2 Sim. 425 ; 29 E. E. 128 160 Davis, i?e, 12 Eq. 214 303 , Mnckalt K. Davis, W. N. (1887), 186 323 v. Angel, 10 W. E. 723 356 II. Duke of Marlborough, 1 Sw. 74 42 Dawson, .Re, 48 W. R. 73 291 V. Clarke, 18 Ves. 247 ; 11 E. E. 188 104, 367 V. Prince, 2 D. & J. 41 ; 6 W. E. 171 ; 27 L. J. Ch. 169 ; .SOL. T. 237 397 !!. Small, 14 Eq. 104 ; 22 "W. E. 514 ; 43 L. J. Ch. 406 ; SOL. T. 252 62 Dean, Be, Cooper-Dean v. Stevens, 41 Gh. D. 556 ; 60 L. T. 813 : 62, 64, 65 T. McDowell, 8 Ch. D. 345 ; 26 W. E. 486 ; 47 L. J. Ch. 537 ; 38L. T. 862 127 De Beanvoir i>. De Beauvoir, 3 H. L. Cas. 524 124 De BusBche r. Alt, 8 Ch. D. 287 249 de Clifford (Lord), Be, de Clifford v. Qnilter, [1900] 2 Ch.'707 ... 361 De la Warr (Earl), J?«, 16 Ch. D. 587 179,187 Delves i\ Newington, 52 L. T. 512 178 Dent ^. Bennett, 4 My. & Cr. 277 ; 40 E. E. 188 ... 66 «. Dent, 30 Beav. 363 "" 184 De Pothonier, Be, Dent r. Pothonier, [1900] 2 Ch. 529 ... 198, 232 

TABLE OF CASES. XXIX PAGE De Sayres !•. De Sayres, 87 L. T. n. 93 ... — 312 De Tabley, Ec, Leighton r. Leighton, 75 L. T. 328 18i, 185 De Teissier, Re, De Teissier c. De Teissier, [1893] 1 Ch. 153 ; 62 L. J. Ch. 552 ; 68 L. T. 275 ; 41 W. R. 186 ., ... 184 Detmold, Ec, Detmold r. Detmold, 40 Cli. D. 585 J ...48, 82 De Visme, J?e, 2De G. J. & S. 17 ; 12 W. R. 140 ; 33 L, J. Ch. 332;9L. T. 668 '. ... 117 Dewarc Brooke, 33 W.R. 497 228 Dewhirst, Ee, 33 Ch. D. 416 ; 35 W. R. 147 ; 55 L. T. 427 ; 55L. J. Ch. 842 305,315,317 De Witte i: Palin, 14 Eq. 251 ; 20 W. R. 858 ; 26 L. T. 825 257, 262 Dibbs r. Goren, 11 Beav. 483 388 Dick, Re, Lopes v. Hume-Dick, [1891] 1 Ch. 433 ; 60 L. J. Ch. 177 ; 64L. T. 32 201,204 Dickonson r. Player, C. P., Cooper's Cases, 1837, 1838, p. 178 ... 207 Dickson, Re, Hill v. Grant, 29 Ch. D. 331 270 Diggles, Ee, Gregory r. Edmondson, .30 Ch. D. 253 15,23 Dimes r. Scott, 4 Russ. 195 ; 28 R. R. 46 176, 349, 350 Dipple r. Corles, 11 Hare, 183 ; 1 W. R. 47 ; 22 L. J. Ch. 15 ...14. 28 Dix V. Bmrford, 19 Beav. 409 367 Dixon, Re, Heynes v. Dixon, [1900] 2 Ch. 561 386 r. Brown. 32 Ch. D. 587 7 V. Dixon, 9 Ch. D. 587 ; 27 W. R. 282 ; 48 L. J. Ch. 592 ; 40L. T. 208 382,383 I'. Gayfere, 21 Beav. 118 ; 17 Beav. 433 129,278 «. Olmius, 1 Cox, 414 133 Dobson r. Land, 8 Hare. 330 130,198 Docksey v. Docksey, 2 Eq. Ca. 506 104 Doewra, Re, 29 Ch. D. 693 286 Dod r. Dod, Amb. 274 97 Dodds r. Hills, 2 Hem. & M. 424 400 r. Take, 25 Ch. D. 617 321,326 Dodkin ^. Brunt, 6 Eq. 580 28,303 Doe v. Barthropp, 5 Taunt. 382 ; 15 R. R. 530 147 ». Biggs, 2 Taunt. 109 ; 11 R. R. 533 140 f. Bolton, 11 A. & E. 188 ; 3 P. & D. 185 ... 140, 142, 148 V. Bottriell. 5 B. & Ad. 131 ; 39 R. R. 432 89 i. Cafe, 7 Ex. 675 146 «. EdliD, 4 A. & E. 582 ; 5 L. J. K. B. 137 142,148 ». Ewart. 7 A. & E. 636 ; 7 L. J. Q. B. 177 142,147 V. Field, 2 B. & Ad. 564 ; 36 R. R. 672 142, 147 r. Godwin, 1 D. & R. 259 ; 16 R. R. 463 284 r. Harris, 16 M. & W. 522 ; 16 L. J. Ex. 190 135,136 «. Homfray, 6 A. & E. 206 ; 1 Nev. & P. 401 143 ». Mnnning, 9 East, 57 ; 9 R. R. 503 89,92 «. Mores, 2 W. Bl. 1019 89 V. Nichols, 1 B. & C. 336 ; 1 L. J. K. B. 124 ; 25 R. R. 398 ... 143 V. Rontledge, Cowp. 705 93 r. Rusham, 17 Q. B. 723 90,91 I'. Simpson, 5 East, 162 143,147 1). Willan, 2 B. & Ad. 84 Ii7 Doering v. Doering, 42 Ch. D. 203 ; 37 W. R. 796 ; 58 L. J. Ch. 553 382, 383, 387. 391 Dolphin V. Aylward, 4 H. L. 486 89 Donaldson v. Donaldson, Kay, 711 ; 24 W. R. 1137 ; 34 L. T. 900 ...33, 59 Dooby B. Watson, 39 Ch. D. 178 131,132,366 Dorin V. Dorin, L. R. 7 ; H. L. 568 ; 23 W. R." 570 49 Douglas, Re, Obert v. Barron, 35 Ch. D. 472 62 XXX 

TABLE OF CASES. 

PAGE Douglas r. Andrews, 12 Beav. 310 262 V. Archbut, 2 D. & J. 148 ; 6 W. K. 306 ; 81 L. T. 4 ; 47L. J. Ch.291 240 i: Bolam, [1900] 2 Ch. 749 ... 295 Dovei;. Everard, IRnss. &M. 231; 32R. R. 200 137 Dover r. Buck, 5 Giff. 57 248 Downes f. Bullock, 25 Beav. 54 388 Downing, J?e, 60 L. T. 140 56 Dowse V. Gorton, [1891] A. C. 190 322, 331 Doyle D. Blake, 2 Sch. & Lef. 239 ; 9 R. K. 76 ... 135,137,188,220 Drake «. Trefusis, 10 Ch. App. 364 184 Drew «. Martin, 2 Hem. & M. p. 133 ; 12 W. R. 547 ; 33 L. J. Ch. 367 * 10 L T 291 . •• ... 30 113 Drinkwater v. Coo'mbe, 2 S. & St'.'ko ; i L. J. Ch. 178 ; 25 R. R. 210 :' 131 Driver, i?e, 19 Eq. 352 299,305 Drosier !-. Brereton, 15 Beav. 221 218,214 Dubois, ^a ^a?'ie, 1 Cox 310 151 Dnbost, ^a- ^a?'Je, 18 Ves. 140 ; 11 R. R. 173 36 Dugdale, i?e, Dugdale !!. Dugdale, 88 Ch. D. 176 49,52 Dulwich, etc. Society, Re Meall v. Pearce, 68 L. J. Ch. 196 360 Dumas, Expwrte. 2 Ves. sen. 582 ; 1 Amb. 284 352, 354 Durable, J?<>, Williams !). Murray, 23 Ch. D. 360 271 Dnngannou «. Smith, 12 CI. & F. 546 45 Dunn V. Flood, 25 Ch. D. 629 ; 32 W. R. 197 ; 49 L. T. 670 ... 195 Dunnage ti. White, 1 Jac. & W. 588 104 Duttou ». Thompson, 23 Ch. D. 278 67, 68, 327 Dyerr. Dyer, 2 Cox, 73 ; 2R. R. 14 113 Dyke r. Rendall, 2 De G. M. & G. 209 129 Dyson and Fowke, Be, [1896] 2 Ch. 720 ; 65 L. J. Ch. 790 ; 74 L. T. 759 ; 45 W. R. 28 279 E. Eady «. Watson, 12 W. R. 682 187 East, i?e, 8 Ch. App. 785 ; 42 L. J. Ch. 480 297 East Coast Rail. Co. r. Hawkes, 5 H. L. Cas. 331 196 Easton 13. Landor, 67 L. T. 883 ; 62 L. J. Ch. 64 ; 67 L. T. 833 ... 327 Eastwood !). Clarke, 23 Ch. D. 134 272 Eaton v. Daines, W. N. (1894), 32 ; 70 L. T. 761 305 Eaves v. Hickson, 80 Beav. 136 ; 10 W. R. 29 ; 5 L. T. 598 ; 7 Jur. (N.S.)1297 217,218,220,384 Ebrand r. Dancer, 2 Ch. Ca. 26 113, 119 Ecclesiastical Commissioners v. Pinney, [1900] 2 Ch. 736 196 Eddel, i?e, 11 Eq. 559 147 Edgar i>. Plomley, [1900] A. C. 431 383 Edmonds r. Peake, 7 Beav. 239 233 Edwards v. Dewar, 34 W. R. 62 ; 54 L. J. Ch. 1049 ; 53 L. T. 422 326 f. Fashion, Pr. Ch. .882 114 v. Harben, 2 T. R. 587 ; 1 R. R. 548 78 V. Jones, 1 My. & Cr. 226 ; 5 L. J. (N.s.) Ch. 194 : 43R. R.,178 33 V. Merrick, 2 Hare, 60 251 Egbert II. Butter, 21 Beav. 560 237,883 Eglin «. Sanderson, 3 Giff. 434 253 Egmont (Earl) v. Smith, 6 Ch. D. 469 ; 46 L. J. Ch. 356 : 128, 129, 252 Elcock B. Mapp, 3 H. L. Cas. 492 104 Elliott, Be, 15 Eq. 194 ; 21 W. R. 455 ; 42 L. J. Ch. 289 : 332, 338, 834 Ellis, Be, 17 Eq. 409 ; 22 W. R. 448 ; 43 L. J. Ch. 444 281 

TABLE OF CASES. 

XXxi PAGE ElHs, Re, 59 L. T. 924 • 331 —— 1'. Barker, 7 Ch. App. 104 161 Ellison, Re, 2 Jur. (n.s.) 262 135 V. Ellison, 2 Wh. & Tu. 835 ; 6 Ves. 656 ; 6 R. R. 19 ... 28 Elmore, Re, 9 W. R. 66 187 Elton ^•. Elton, 27 Beav. 634 97 Elve v. Boyton, [1891] 1 Ch. 501 ; 60 L. J. Ch. 383 ; 64 L. T. 482 208 Emma Silver Mining Co. v. Grant, 11 Ch. D. 918 ; 40 L. T. 804 ... 127 Emmet, Re, Emmet v. Emmet, 17 Ch. D. 142 ; 29 W. R. 464 ; 50 L. J. Ch. 341 ; 44 L. T. 173 344,345 Equitable Society v. Fuller, 1 John. & H. 379 187 Ernest v. Croysdill, 2 D. F. & J."l75 351 Essery r. Cowlard, 26 Ch. D. 191 66,69,107 Evans, Re, 7 Ch. App. 659 179 , iJe, Evans !!. Evans, 34 Ch. D. 597 322 r. Benyon, 87 Ch. D. 229 369,380 r. Bicknell, 6 Ves. 174 ; 5 R. E. 245 151 r. Carrington, 2 D. E. & J. 481 ; 30 L. J. Ch. 364 : 4 L. T. 65 70 !). Edmonds, 13 C. B. 777 70 r. Jackson, 8 Sim. 217 ; 6 L. J. (N.S.) Ch. 8 ; 42 E. R. 163 260 ^•. John, 4 Beav. 35 138 Everett ». Prythergch, 12 Sim. 365 357 Everitt v. Everitt, 10 Eq. 405 ; 18 W. R. 1020 ; 23 L. T. 136 ... 67, 68 Evers v. Challis, 7 H. L. Cas. 531 44, 46 Eykin, J?e, 6 Ch. D. 115 113 Eyre i: Dolphin, 2 B. & B. 290 126 ». Shaftesbury (Countess), 2 P. "Wms. 121—124 284 Eyston, -Ba ^ar«e, 7 Ch. D. 145 281 Eyton, Re, Bartlett v. Charles, 45 Ch. D. 458 ; 59 L. J. Ch. 733 ; 63 L. T. 336 ; 39 W. R. 135 398 Ezort V. Lister, 5 Beav. 585 385 Earhall r. Earhall, 7 Ch. App. 123 ; 20 W. R. 157 ; 41 L. J. Ch. 146 ; 25 L. T. 685 151 Farmer r. Deane, 32 Beav. 327 244,249 Famham, Re, [1895] 2 Ch. 730 ; 64 L. J. Ch. 717 ; 73 L.T. 231 ... 86 Farrant v. Blanchford, 11 W. R. 178 ; 32 L. J. Ch. 107 ; 7 L. T. 607 370,371 Farrar r. Farrar, Ltd., 40 Ch. D. 395 248 Fawcett r. Whitehouse, 1 E. & M. 132 ; 32 R. R. 163 ; 8 L. J. Ch. 50 127 Featherstone ?). West, 6 Ir. Eq. R. 86 375,378 Featherstonhaugh v. Fenvrick, 17 Ves. 311 ; 11 R. R. 77 127 Feistel r. St. John's College, 10 Beav. 491 43 Fellows, Re, 2 Jur. (N.S.) 62 187 i: Mitchell, 1 F. "Wms. 81 ; 2 Vern. 516 236 Fenwick i: Clarke, 4 De G. F. & J. 240 ; 10 W. R. 636 ; 31 L. J. Ch. 728;6L. T. 593 163,233,388 Ferris r. Mullins, 2 Sm. & Gif. 378 130 Festing v. Allen, 12 M. & W. 279 146 Field II. Donoughmore, 1 Dr. & War. 227 25 i: Field, [1894] 1 Ch. 425 ; 63 L. J. Ch. 233 ; 69 L. T. 826 ; 42W. R. 346 198,232 Finden v. Stephens, 2 l^h. 142 26 XXXll 

TABLE OP CASES. 

PAGE Pinney, Re, 3 Gif. 465 '. 288 Mrmin «. Pulham, 2 Dea. & Sw. 99 328 Pish, Re, Bennett v. Bennett, [1893] 2 Ch. 413 ; 69 L. T. 233 ... 242 Pisk «. Att.-Gen. 4 Eq. 521 ; 15 W. K. 1200 62 Pitch ?). Webber, 6 Hare, 145 121 Pitzgerald, Re, 37 Ch. D. 18 25 Fitzherbert, ^e, W. N. (1898), 58 295 Pitzpatriek v. Waring, 11 L. R. Ir. 35 260 Pitzsimmon, ^a jiarfe, 25 L. R. Ir. 24 354 Planagan r. Great Western Rail. Co., 19 L. T. (N.S.) 345 127 Plavell, Re, Murray v. Plavell, 25 Ch. D. 89 34, 39 Pletcher ?;. Ashbumer, 1 W. & T. L. Cas. 741 124 r. Fletcher, 4 Hare, 78 356 i>. Green, 33 Beav. 426 238,348,361,376 Flower and Met. Board, Re, 27 Ch. D. 592 ; 32 W. R. 1011 ... 220, 230, 234, 235, 236 Ployer i\ Banks, 8 Eq. 115 44,49,131 Foley D. Barry, 2 My. & K. 138 22 I). Bnrnell, 1 B. C. C. 277 356,357 V. Hill, 2 H. L. Cas. 28 366 V. Wontner, 2 Jac. & W. 245 ; 22 E. E. 110 284 Poligno, iJe, 32 Bear. 131 33.3,334 Ford, Re, Gilbert v. Gilbert, 63 L. T. 557 28 Forrest v. Forrest, 13 W. R. 380 ; 11 L. T. 763 ; 34 L. J. Ch. 428 ; 11 Jur. (N.S.) 311 114 Porshaw v. Higginson, 8 D. M. & G. 827 ; 20 Beav. 485 ; 5 W. R. 424 ; 26 L. J. Ch. 342 ; 29 L. T. 43 ; 3 Jur. (N.S.) 476.. .191, 293, 334 ' v. Welsby, 30 Beav. 243 66, 70 Forster ^). Abraham, 17 Eq. 351 306 Portoscue v. Barnett, 3 My. & K. 36 ; 3 L. J. (sr.s.) Ch. 106 ; 41R. E. 5 33 Foster, i?e, 55 L. T. 499 304 Foster and Lister, Re, 6 Ch. D. 87 ; 25 W. E. 553 ; 46 L. .1. Ch. 480 ; 36 L. T. 582 92 -, i?e, Lloyd r. Carr, 45 Ch. D. 629 178 D. Dauber, 8 W. E. 646 135 V. Elaley, 19 Ch. D. 518 ; 30 W. E. 596 ; 51 L. J. Ch. 275 ... 26 «). Hale, 3 Ves. 696 52,53 Fountain r. Pellet, 1 Ves. jun. 337, 342 179,181 Foulkes r. Metropolitan District Eail. Co., 5 C. P. D. 157 4 Poveaux,i;e,Crossi;.Loudon Antivivisectiou Society, [1895] 2 Ch. 501 : 65 Fowkes v. Pascoe, 10 Ch. App. 343, 349 108 114 115 Fowler, JJe, W. N. (1886), p. 183 295 , Re, Fowler v. Odell, 16 Ch. D. 723 ; 29 W. R. 891 ; 44 L. T. 99 184,199,260 V. Fowler, 33 Beav. 616 62 Fox f. Buckley, 3 Ch. D. 511 ; 25 W. R. 107 7,383 389 V. Hawkes, 13 Ch. D. 822 ; 28 W. R. 656 ; 49 L. J. Ch. 579 : 42L. T. 622 38 V. Mackreth, 2 Wh. & Tu. 709 ; 2 Cox, 320 ; 2 R. R. 55 ... 244 Francis i: Francis, 5 D. M. & G. 108 209, 238, 249 Eraser D. Murdoch, 6 App. Cas. 855 164,223 320 321 Freeman, Re, W. N. (1887), p. 210 ; 37 Ch. D. 148 ' 242 .307 i: Pope, 5 Ch. App. 540 ; 18 W. R. 906 ; 39 L. J. Ch. 689 : ^ 23L.T. 14 7.5,79,80 Preman, Re, Dimond v. Newburn, [1898] 1 Ch. 28 185 Preme r. Clement, 18 Ch. D. 514 ; 44 L. T. 398 144 French t'. Hobson, 9 Ves. 103 "', 369 TABLE OP CASES. XXXIU PAGK Frith V. Cameron, 12 Eq. 169 184 r. Oartland, 2 Hem. &M. 417 ; 14 "W. K. 493 ; 34 L. J. Ch. 301 ; 12L. T. 175 150,351,352 Frost, Re, Frost v. Frost, 43 Ch. D. 246 46 Fry, Re, 40 Ch. D. 104 70 v. Tapson, 28 Ch. D. 268 ; 33 W. R. 113 ; 54 L. J. Ch. 224 ; 51L. T. 326 196,214,221,224,347 Fryer, i?e, 3 Kay & J. 317; 5 "W. R. 552; 26 L. J. Ch. 398; 3 Jur. (N.S.) 485 221,236 Fnlham, Re, 15 Jur. (U.S.) 69 187 Fuller, ^f, [1900] 2 Ch. 551 301,317 i\ Knight, 6 Beav. 205 382,387 G. Gadd, Re, Eastwood r. Clarke, 23 Ch. D. 134 ; 31 W. R. 417 ; 52 L. J. Ch. 396 ; 48 L. T. 395 298 GafEee, iJe, 1 M. & G. 547 277,281 Gainsborough (Lord) v. Watcombe Terra Cotta Co., 54 L. J. Ch. 991 ; 53 L. T. 117 250,344 Gale V. Gale, 6 Ch. D. 144 ; 25 W. R. 772 ; 36 L. T. 690 ... 28, 29, 31 Gardiner, Re, 33 Ch. D. 590 ; 35 W. R. 28 ; 55 L. T. 261 ; 55L. J. Ch. 714 295, .305, 315 Gardner, Re, 10 Ch. D. 29 312 Garland, ^.r ^(irte, 10 Ves. 199 151,323 Gamer v. Moore, 3 Drew. 277 ; 3 W. R. 497 273 Garnett, Re, Gandy r. Macauley, 31 Ch. D. 1 ; 32 W. R. 474 ...331, 369, 373 Gamham v. Skipper, 34 W. R. 935 ; 55 L. J. Ch. 263 ; 53 L. T. 940 7 Garrard r. Lauderdale, 3 Sim. 1 ; 2 R. & M. 451 25 Garrett f. Wilkinson, 2 D. & S. 244 117 Gascoigne r. Thwing, 1 Ver. 366 104 Gaskell r. Chambers, 26 Beav. 360 127 Gasquoine, Re, Gasquoine v. Gasquoine, [1894] 1 Ch. 470 198 Gee 1^. Liddell, 35 Beav. 621 35 General Estates Co., Re, 3 Ch. App. 758 ; 16 W. R. 919 ; 18 L. T. 894 391,399 Genery r. Fitzgerald, Jac. 468 271 Gent i;. Harrison, John. 517 263 George, Re, 5 Ch. D. 837 ; 37 L. T. 204 270, 271 !;. Howard, 7 Price, 646 ; 21 R. R. 775 114 ('. Milbanke, 9 Ves. 189 ; 7 R. R. 157 75 German Mining Co., JZ«, 4 D. M. & 6. 19 320 Gibbins r. Taylor, 22 Beav. 344 376 Gibbs !. Glamis, 11 Sim. 584 25 ?). Rumsey, 2 V. & B. 294 ; 13 R. R. 88 104,112 Gibson t). Jeyes, 6 Ves. 277 ; 5 R. R. 295 244,251 i;. Lord Montfort, 1 Ves. 485 147 Giffard (Lord) r. Fitzhardinge (Lord), [1899] 2 Ch. 32 ; 68 L. J. Ch. 529 ; 47 W. R. 618 ; 81 L. T. 106 131 Gilbert v. Overton, 2 Hem. & M. 110 33, 40, 59 Giles, Re, 34 W. R. 712 332, 335, 337 Gilroy v. Stephen, 30 W. R. 755 ; 46 L. T. 761 198, 344 Gisbome f. Gisbome, 2 App. Cas. 300 ; 25 W. R. 516 ; 46 L. J. Ch. 556 ; 36 L. T. 564 167, 256, 257, 261, 273 Gjers, Re, Cooper i-. Gjers, [1899] 2 Ch. 54 ; 68 L. J. Ch. 442 ; 47 W. R. 535 ; 80 L. T. 689 179, 181, 

185 XXXIV TABLE OP CASES. 

PAGE Gladdon v. Stoneman, 1 Madd. 143 n 357 Glenny and Hartley, Be, 25 Ch. D. 611 ; 32 W. K. 457 ; 53 L.J. Ch. 417;50L. T. 79 296 Glenorchy (Lord) v. Bosville, For. 3 ; 2 W. & T. L. C. 763 94, 96 Glover v. StrothofE, 2 B. C. C. 33 43 Godden, He, Teague v. Fox, [1893] 1 Ch. 292 ; 62 L. J. Ch. 469 ; 68L.T.116 ... 171,177 Godfrey, JSe, 23 Ch. D. 205 317 ,iJe,Godfreyi!. Faulkner, 23 Ch. D. 483 214 V. Poole, 13 App. Cas. 503 ; 58 L. T. 685 ; 37 W. R. 357... 76 Godolphin ^. Godolphin, 1 Ves. sen. 21 308 Goldsworthy u. Knight, 11 M. & W. 337 234 Gompertz t'. Kensit, 13 Eq. 369 324 Goodenough, Me, Marland v. Williams, [1895] 2 Ch. 537 171, ® 177, 344 r. Tremamondo, 2 Beav. 512 168 Goodier v. Johnson, 18 Ch. D. 441 46 Goodson V. Ellison, 3 Russ. 583 ; 27 R. H. 127 334 Goodwin, Be, 17 Eq. 345 ; 22 W. R. 619-; 43 L. J. Ch. 258 ... 49 Gordon, Be, Gordon -e. Roberts, 6 Ch. D. 531 ; 46 L. J. Ch. 794 ; 37L. T. 627 135 Gosling «. Gosling, Johns. 265 277 Gough V. Bult, 16 Sim. 323 21 «. Etty, 20 L. T. 358 327 «. Smith, W. N. (1872), p. 18 234,236 Gould, J?e, 19 Q. B. D. 92 85 1!. Robertson, 4 De G. & S. 509 25 Gow i;. Forster, 26 Ch. D. 672 183 Gowan v. White, 60 L. T. 931 105 Grant v. Grant, 34 Beav. 623 38 Graves v. Dolphin, 1 Sim. 66 ; 5 L. J. Ch. 45 ; 27 R. R. 166 , ..44, 48 Gray, -Erparfei, 4 Dea. & Ch. 778; 2M. & A. 283 151 V. Siggers, 15 Ch. D. 74 ; 29 W. R. 13 ; 49 L. J. Ch. 819... 167, 173 Graybum i: Clarkson, 3 Ch. App. 606 ; 17 W. R. 716 ; 18 L. T. 495 197 Great Luxembourg Rail. Co. «. Magnay. 25 Beav. 586 127 Greaves, Be, Jones v. Greaves, [1900] 2 Ch. 683 270, 271 1). Simpson, 10 Jur. (N.S.) 609 96 Green, .ffiBparis, 2Dea. &Ch. 116; 1 Jac. & W. 253 151, 257, 262 V. Carlill, 4 Ch. D. 882 ; 46 L. J. Ch. 477 19 ». Marsden, 1 Dr. 646 ; 1 W. R. 511 22 V. Paterson, 32 Ch. D. 95 ; 54 L. T. 738 ; 34 W. R. 724 ...28, 38 V. Spicer, 1 R. & M. 395 ; 8 L. J. Ch. 105 ; 32 R. R. 232 ... 48, 49, 281 V. Wynn, 4 Ch. App. 204 ; 17 W. R. 385 ; 38 L. J. Ch. 220 ; 20L. T. 131 106 Greenway ^. Greenway, 29 L. J. Ch. 601 124 Greenwood, i;e, 27 Ch. D. 359 312 ». Wakeford, 1 Beav. 581 293 Gregory 1). Gregory, 2 Y. & C. C. C. 313 221 V. Henderson, 4 Taunt. 772 j 14 E. E. 665 141 Gregson, JJc, [1893] 3 Ch. 233 314 Trusts. Be, 34 Ch. D. 209 : 56 L. J. Ch. 286 ; 35 W. R. 286 : 291, 299, 305 Grenfell !). Dean, etc. of Windsor, 2 Beav. .554 41 Grenville-Murray v. Clarendon (Earl), 9 Eq. 11 ; 18 W. R. 124 ; 39 L. J. Ch. 221 ; 21 L. T. 448 27 

TABLE OP CASES. 

XXXV PAGE . Luseombe, 2 Sw. 391 148 Hayter, iie, 32 W. E. 26 254 Head and Macdonald, jffe, 38 W. E. 657 159 Head v. Gould, [1898] 2 Ch. 250 ; 67 L. J. Ch. 480 ; 78 L. T. 739 : 199. 347, 348. 378 Headington, iZe, 6 "W. E. 7 ; 27 L. J. Ch. 175 .332 Heardson SI. Williamson, 1 Kee. 33 ; 44 E. E. 7 143,147 Heartley 1). Nicholson, 19 Eq. 233 36 Heasman I'. Pearce, 7 Ch. App. 275 45 Heath v. Lewis, 2 D. M. & G. 954 52 Heming, iZe, 3 Kay & J. 40 332. .335 Hemming I'. Neil, 62 L. T. 649 220 Henderson ?;. M'lver, 3 Madd. 275 .. .. 226 r. Eothschild, 33 Ch. D. 459 25 Hengler, Be, Frowde v. Hengler, [1893] 1 Ch. 586 ; W. N. (1893), 37 ; 62 L. J. Ch. 383 ; 68 L. T. 84 ; 41 W. E. 491 ... 183,331 Henriquez r. Bensusan, 20 W. E. 350 25 Henry v. Armstrong, 18 Ch. D. 668 ; 44 L. T. 918 29, 67, 68 Hepworth r. Hepworth, 11 Eq. 10 : 19 W. E. 46 : 40 L. J. Ch. Ill : 23L. T. 388 117 Hetherington, i?e, 34 Ch. D. 211 319 HetlingandMerton, iie,,68L. T. 749; 42W. E. 19... ... ... 22.5 Hewitt, i?e, 6 W. E. 537 311 Hibbert r. Hibbert, 3 Meri. 681 ; 17 E. E. 169 ... 26 t'. Cooke, 1 S. & S. 552 ; 24 B. E. 225 184 Hickley t. Hickley, 2 Ch. D. 190 ; 24 "W. E. 604 ; 45 L. J. Ch. 401 • 34L.T.441 ; 251 Higginbottom, Be, [1892] 3 Ch. 132 ; 62 L. J. Ch. 74 ; 67 L. T. 190 295 1'. Holme, 19 Ves. 88 48, 81, 83 Higgins i: Hill, 56 L. T. 426 41 TABLE OF CASES. XXXVll PAGE Highway I). Banner, 1 Bro. C. C. 584 97 Hill's Trusts, iie, W. N. (1874), 228 307 Hill, Re, 75 L. T. 477 344 , Be, Hill v. Pilcher, 65 L. J. Ch. 511 ; 74 L. T. 460 ; 44 W. R. 573 258 e. Bishop of London. 1 Atk. 626 103 V. Hill, [1897] 1 Q. B. 483 ; 66 L. J. Q. B. 829 ; 76 L. T. 103 ; 45W. E. 371 28 Hilliard r. Fulford, 4 Ch. D. 889 219, 254, 388 Hillman, 7?e, 10 Ch. D. 622 91 Hinchinbrooke (Lord) v. Shipbrook, 16 Ves. 477 237 Hindmarsh, Re, 1 Drew. & Sm. 129 132 Hinton v. Hinton, 2 Ves. sen. 638 . ... 150 Hinves «. Hinves, 3 Hare, 609 165 Hirst ?;. Hirst, 9 Ch. App. 262 337 Kitchens f. Congreve, 1 Ry. & M. 150 , 127 Hoare v. Osborne, 1 Eq. 585 ; 14 W. R. 388 ; 14 L. T. 9 ; 35 L. J. Ch. 345 64 Hobbs f). Wayet, 36 Ch. 250 320,321 Hobday r. Peters, 28 Beav. 608 198 Hoblyn v. Hoblyn, 41 Ch. D. 200 ; 60 L. T. 499 ; 38 W. R. 12 ... 72 Hobson, Re, 53 L. T. 627 ; 34 W. E. 70 171, 177 Hockey v. Western, [1898] 1 Ch. 350 ; 67 L. J. Ch. 166 ; 78 L. T. 1 ; 46W. R. 312 280 Hodgkinson, Re, Hodgkinson v. Hodgkinson, [1895] 2 Ch. 190 ; 64 L. J. Ch. 663 ; 72 L. T. 617 ; 43 W. R. 594 323, 385 Hodgson, ^a; ^arfe, 19 Ves. 208 48,81 Hoghton I'. Hoghton, 15 Beav. 299 66 Holbey c. Western, [1898] 1 Ch. 350 220 Holden, Re, 20 Q. B. D. 48 327 Holford, i?e, [1894] 3 Ch. 30 271 Holland, iJe, 16 Ch. D. 672 317 HoUoway «. Eadcliffe, 28 Beav. 163 278 Holmes v. Dring, 2 Cox, 1 208 4!. Williams, W. N. (1895), 116 127 Holt, Re, 49 W. E. 650 875 , Re, Holt -c. Holt, [1897] 2 Ch. 525 879, 381 Hood i). Oglander, 84 Beav. 513 ; 34 L. J. Ch. .528 49,281 Hooper v. Smart, 1 Ch. D. 90, 98 887 Hope V. D'Hedouville, [1893] 2 Ch. 361 ; 62 L. J. Ch. 589 ; 68 L.T.. 516 174,176 Hopgood i>. Parkin, 11 Eq. 70 ; 18 W. E. 908 ; 22 L. T. 772 : 226, 228 Hopkins, iJe, 18 Eq. 696 162 Hopper V. Conyers, 2 Eq. 549 ; 14 W. E. 628 ; 12 Jur. (N.S.) 328. ..351, 355 Hora I). Hora, 33 Bear. 88 23 Horlock ?). Horlock, 2 De G. M. & G. 644 281 Home, -EK^aJiSe, 51L. T. 301 83 ». Barton, 19 Ves. 398 97 Hosegood 1). Pedler, 66 L. J. Q. B. 18 ; 13 T. L. R. 6 320 Hoskin, iJe, 5 Ch. D. 229 330,334 Hotchkys, Re, Freke v. Calmady, 32 Ch. D. 408 ; 84 W. R. 569 ; 55 L. J. Ch. 546 ; 55 L. T. 110 179, 184, 199 Household, i?«, 27 Ch. D. 558 184 Houston «. Hughes, 6 B. & C. 403 142 How V. Earl Winterton, [1896] 2 Ch. 626 ; 65 L. J. Ch. 832 ; 75 L. T. 40;45W. R. 103 364,365 Howe V. Dartmouth (Lord), 1 W. & T. L. Ca. 68 ; 6 R. R. 96 ... 165, 166, 209 XXXviii TABLE OF CASES. VX'i Howel D. Howel, 2 Ves. 358 ^ ••• „ •• ^^ Howarth, Se, 8 Ch. App. 415 ; 21 W. K. 449 ; 42 L. J. Ch. 316;^ 28L. T. 54 ^ •• „,,2o(,2b2 Hubbuok, i?e, Hart v. Store, [1896] 1 Ch. 754 ; 65 L. J. Ch. 271 ; 73 L. T. 738 ; 44 W. R. 289 1", 17» Hughes, JEx parte, 6 Yes. 617 249 V. Empson, 22 Beay. 181 197 II. Kearney, 1 Sch. & Lef. 134 ; 9 E. R. 30 129' I'. Key, 20 Beav. 395 ^^* V. Williams, 12 Vee. 493 ; 8 R. R. 364 13* V. Wills, 9 Hare, 773 369- Hughes-Hall ett v. Indian Mammoth Gold Mines Co., 22 Ch. I). 561 ; 52 L. J. Ch. 418 ; 48 L. T. 107 ; 31 W. R. 285 322; Hnguenin *'. Baseley, 14 Ves. 273 ; 9 R. R. 276 66, 68, 71 Hulkes, Sc, Powell v. Hulkes, 35 W. R. 194; W. N. (1886), HI : 217, 04:0 Humberston v. Humberston, 1 P. Wms. 332 95, 100 Hume r. Richardson, 4 De G. P. & J. 29 ; 10 W. R. 558 ; 31 L. J. Ch. 713 ; 6 L. T. 624 ; 8 Jur. (N.S.) 686 IJ* Humphrey, Re, 1 Jur. (N.S.) 921 293 Humphries, Be, 62 L. J. Ch. 498 ; 41 W. R. 519 ; 68 L. T. 729 ... 270 Hunt, Ee, Pollard v. Geake, [1900] W. N. 65 281, 283- r. Bateman, 10 Ir. Eq. E. 360 ^oT Hunt-Poulston v. Purber, 3 Ch. D. 285 ; 24 W. R. 756 278 Hunter D. Atkins, 3 My. & K. 113 ; 41 E. E. 30 68 V. Bullock, 14 Eq. 45 ; 20 W. R. 460 ; 41 L. J. Ch. 637 ; 26 L. T. 349 "2 Hurst, Re, Addison v. Topp, 67 L. T. 96 ; 63 L. T. 665 ... 155, 163^ 188, 190, 209 V. Hurst, 9 Ch. App. 762 239 Hutchings, Re, W. N. (1887), 217 22 Hutchinson v. Stephens, 5 Sim. 499 ; 44 R. R. 72 304, 312 Hutton v. Annan, [1898] A. C. 289 ; 67 L. J. P. C. 49 ; 14 T. L. E. 255 ... ... 200,208- Huxtable, Esk parte, 2 Ch. D. 54 ; 24 W. E. 686 ; 45 L. J. Bkcy. 59 ; B4L. T. T. 608 87 Hylton V. Hylton, 2 Yes. 547 68- Ibbetson v. Elam, 1 Eq. 188 162: Imperial Land Co. of Marseilles, Re, 4 Ch. D. 566 ; 46 L. J. Ch. 235 243 Ingle «). Partridge, 34 Beav. 412 196,214 Ingram, Re, 11 W. E. 980 211 Inwood V. Twyne, 2 Eden, 153 257 Irby, Re, 17 Beav. 334 332 •». Irby, 25 Beav. 632 387 Irons V. Smallpiece, 2 B. & Aid. 551 ; 21 E. R. 395 37 Irvine v. SuUiyan, 8 Eq. 673 ; 17 W. R. 1083 104, 105, 108 Irwin, J?e, Barton B. Irwin, W. N. (1895), 23 331 Isaac, Re, Cronbach v. Isaac, [1897] 1 Ch. 251 ; 66 L. J. Ch. 160 ; 75 L. T. 638 ; 45 W. R. 262 324 V. Wall, 6 Ch. D. 706 131 

TABLE OP CASES. 

XXXIX J. PAGE Jackson, Re, Jackson r. Talbot, 21 Ch. D. 786 263 V. Welsh, L. & G. temp. Plunk. 346 127 Jacob i\ Lucas, 1 Beav. 436 284 Jacubs V. Rylance. 17 Eq. 351 ; 43 L. J. Ch. 280 332, 383 Jago 1'. Jago, 68 L. T. 654 138 James, Ex parte, 8 Ves. 337 ; 1 Deac. & Ch. 272 245, 247, 321 1-. Couchman, 29 Ch. D. 212 69 V. Dean, 15 Ves. 236 ; 8 K. R. 178 126 V. Erearson, 1 Y. & C. C. C. 370 135, 136 «. May, 6 H. L. Gas. 328 321 Jarratt v. Aldam, 9 Eq. 463 ; 18 W. R. 511 ; 39 L. J. Ch. 349 ; 22L. T. 192 73 JefErey, Be, Burt r. Arnold, [1891] 1 Ch. 671 ; 60 L. J. Ch. 470 ; 64L. T. 622 270 Jeffries «. Jeffries, Cr. & Ph. 138 32 Jenkins v. Keymis, 1 Lev. 150 89 Jervis t'. Wolferstan, 18 Eq. 24 320 Jervoise, Be, 12 Beav. 209 398 V. Northumberland (Duke of), 1 Jac. & W. 571 ; 21 R. R. 229 94,96 r. Silk, 1 G. Coop. 52 ; 14 R. R. 215 262 Jesse «. Lloyd, 48 L. T. 656 263 Job «. Job, 6 Ch. D. 563 197 Jobson v. Palmer, [1893] 1 Ch. 71 ; 62 L J. Ch. 180 ; 67 L. T. 797 188,197 Jodrell T. Jodrell, 9 Bear. 45 50 Johns v. James, 8 Ch. D. 744 ; 39 L. T. 54 ; 26 W. R. 821 25 Johnson, Re, W. N. (1886), 72 208 iJe, Shearman «. Robinson, 15 Ch. D. 548 322,323 v. Eesemeyer, 3 D. & J. 13 251 V. Newton, 11 Hare, 160 233 Johnston i;. Johnston, 52 L. T. 76 66,74 Johnstone •!!. Baber, 8 Beav. 233 159 Jones V. Badley, 3 Ch. App. 362 58 X. Foxall, 15 Beav. 392 342,344 V. Goodchild, 3 P. Wms. 33 153 t . Higgins, 2 Eq. 538 ; 14 W. R. 448 ; 35 L. J. Ch. 403 ; 14L. T. 126 371 V. Julian, 25 L. R. Ir. 45 216 r. Langton, 1 Eq. Ca. Abr. 392 96 -y. Lewis, 2 Ves. 240 197 D. Locke, 1 Ch. App. 25 ; 14 W. R. 149 ; 13 L. T. 514 ; 35 L. J. Ch.ll7 36,37 V. Morgan, 1 Bro. C. C. 206 ; 62 L. J. Ch. 592 96 u. Powell, 4 Beav. 96 273 u. Searle,49L. T. 91 198,345 u. Smith, 1 Hare, 43 - 396 r. Thomas, 3 P. Wms, 243 391 Joseph V. Lyons, 15 Q. B. D. 280 40, 85, 88 Josselyn r. Josselyn, 9 Sim. 63 276 Joy !;. Campbell, 1 Sch. & Lef. 341 ; 9 R. R. 39 237 Joyce I'. De Moleyns, 2 Jo. & Lat. 374 398 Judkin, .Re, 25 Ch. D. 743 270 xl

TABLE OP CASES, 

K. PAGE Kavanagh, J?e, 27 L. K. Ir. 495 207 Kay, Me, Mosley v. Kay, [1897] 2 Ch. 524 ; 66 L. J. 759 ; 46 W. K. 74 ... ... ... ... ••• •• •• •• "• ^^-^ Kaye D. Powell, 1 Ves. 408 275 Keen 1). Deardon, 8 East, 248 142 Kekewich v. Manning, 1 De G. M. & G. 176 ; 21 L. J. Ch. 577 : 33, 59 Kelly V. Nichols, 17 K. I. 306 65 Kemp 4). Burn, 4 GifE. 348 252 Kempson v. Ashbee, 10 Ch. App. 15 ; 23 W. R. 38 ; 44 L. J. Ch. 348;20L. T. 71 72 Kendal v. Granger, 5 Beav. 300 107 V. Wood. L. R. 6 Ex. 248 133 Kenrick v. Beauclerc (Lord), 3 B. & P. 175 ; 6 R. R. 746 141 Kent V. Riley, 14 Eq. 190 ; 20 W. R. 852 ; 41 L. J. Ch. 569 ... 80 Kershaw, Me, Whitaker v. Kershaw, 45 Ch. D. 320 ; 60 L. J. Ch. 9 ; 63L. T. 208 321 Kevan v. Crawford, 6 Ch. D. 29 ; 26 W. R. 49 ; 46 L. J. Ch. 729 ; 37L. T. 332 75,83 Kilbee D. Sneyd, 2 Moll. 199 220 Kilpin V. Kilpin, 1 M. & K. 521 ; 86 R. R. 367 54, 119 King, JJe, 21 L. R. Ir. 273 56,107 , ^e, Sewell ». King, 14 Ch. D. 177 37 V. Denison, 1 V. & B. 279 ; 12 R. R. 227 ... 103, 105, 106 V. King, 1 D. & J. 608 ; 27 L. J. Ch. 29 ; 6 W. R. 85 ; 30 L. T. 177 333 D. Mullins, 1 Drew. 811 328,329 Kingdon ti. Castleman, 25 W. R. 345 193,198 Kingham v. Kingham, [1897] 1 Ir. 170 185 Kingston, etc., Co., Me (No. 2), [1896] 1 Ch. 279 ; 65 L. J. Ch. 290 ; 73 L. T. 745 ; 44 W. R. 363 382 Kinloch v. Secretary of State for India, 15 Ch. D. 1 ; 80 W. R. 845 : 27 Kirkham v. Booth, 11 Beav. 273 154 Kirman -!). Daniel, 5 Hare, 499 25 Knapman, Ee, Knapman v. Wreford, 18 Ch. D. 300 326 Knight, Me, 27 Beav. 45 ; 83 L. T. 54 ; 5 Jur. (U.S.) 326 ...188, 333, 334 !). Bowyer, 23 Beav. 635 40 ». Brown, 7 Jur.(N.S.)894 48 1). Knight, 8 Beav. 148 14 1). Majoribanks, 2 M. & G. 12 247, 252 !). Plymouth (Earl), 1 Dick, 120 282 Knight's Will, i?e, 26 Ch. D. 82 301 Knott, Me, Bax v. Palmer, 56 L. J. Ch. 318 321, 828 Knox, Me, [1895] 2 Ch. 483 ; 64 L. J. Ch. 402 ; 72 L. T. 416 ; 43W. R. 442 313,324 !). Gye, L. R. 5 H. L. 656 ; 42 L. J. Ch. 284 129,252 Kronheim v. Johnson, 7 Ch. D. 60 ; 26 W. R. 142 ; 47 L. J. Ch. 132 ; 37L. T. 751 52 Lacey, -Efe^arte, 6 Ves. 625 243,244 Lacy, Me, Royal General Theatrical Fund v. Kydd, [1899] 2 Ch. 149 ; 68 L. J. Ch, 488 ; 47 W. R. 664 ; 80 L. T. 706 366 TABLE OP CASES. xli Laing, Re, Laing v. Eadcliffe, [1899] 1 Ch. 593 ; 68 L. J. Ch. 230 ; 47 \Y. E. 311 ; 80 L. T. 228 209 Lake u. Gibson, 1 Eq. Ca. Ab. 290 \U Lambe, J?e, 28 Ch. D. 77 295 V. Eames, 6 Ch. App. 599 ; 40 L. J. Ch. 447 ; 23 L. T. 175 ; 19W. K.659 18 Lambert r. Peyton, 8 H. L. Cas. 1 96 Lamotte, Be, 4 Ch. D. 325 311 Lands Allotment Co., Re, [1894] 1 Ch. 631 ; 63 L. J. Ch. 291 ; 70 L. T. 280 ; 42 W. E. 404 132,362 Lane, Re. 24 L. T. 181 ; 3 W. E. 134 333 1-. Debenham, 11 Hare, 188 ; 1 W. E. 465 284,285 r. Dighton, Amb. 409 108,351 Langdale, Re, [1901] 1 Ch. 3 317 Langford V. Angel, 4 Hare, 313 288 r. Gascoigne, 11 Ves. 333 ; 8 E. E. 170 220,237 Langham !). Sandford, 17 Ves. 442 104 Langston v. Ollivant, G. Coop. 33 ; 14 E. R. 216 209 Lashmar, Re, Moody i-. Penfold, [1891] 1 Ch. 258 ; 60 L. J. Ch. 143 ; 64L. T. 333 140,152 Lavendar f. Blackston, 3 Keb. 526 89,91 Law V. Law, 3 P. W. 393 109 Lawson f. Copeland, 2 B. C. C. 156 192,334 Leach D. Leach, 10 Ves. 517 113,369 Leahy 1). De Moleyns, [1896] 1 Ir. E. 206 362 Leake, Be, 32 Beav. 134 332,335 Lee V. Brown, 4 Ves. 369 : 4 E. E. 208 257, 263 1: Lee, 4 Ch. D. 175 ; 25 W. E. 225 ; 46 L. J. Ch. 81 ; 36 L. T. 138 28 V. Sankey, 15 Eq. 204 ; 21 W. E. 286 ; 27 L. T. 809 ... 235, 236, 382, 385 ». yonng, 2 Y. & C. C. 532 204 Leedham !!. Chawner, 4 K. & J. 458 ; 32 L. T. 221 159, 320, 325 Lees, Re, [1896] 2 Ch. 508; 65 L. J. Ch. 770; 75 L. T. 178; 44 W. R. 680 295 Le Hunt 1). "Webster, 9 "W. E. 918 199 Leigh «. Leigh, 35 W. R. 121 ; 55 L. T. 634 213 Leinster (Duke of), J?e, 21 L. E. Ir. 152 182 Le Lievre v. Gould, [1893] 1 Q. B. 500 ; 62 L. J. Q. B. 353 ; 68 L. T. 626 ; 41 W. E. 468 76 Lemann, Re, 22 Ch. D. 633 ; 31 W. E. 520 ; 52 L. J. Ch. 560 ; 48L. T. 389 291,303 Le Marchant v. Le Marchant, 18 Eq. 414 ; 22 W. E. 839 23 Leon, Re, [1892] 1 Ch. 348 295 Leonard v. Sussex (Lord), 2 Ver. 526 99 Lepine, i?«, Dowsett 4). Culver, [1892] 1 Ch. 210 163,164 Leslie, Re, 2 Ch. D. 185 ; 24 W. E. 546 ; 45 L. J. Ch. 668 ; 34 L. T. 239 261 w. BailUe, 2 Y. & C. C. C. 91 218,219 Le Touche 1). Lucan (Earl), 7 C. & r. 672 25 Lever, Re, Cordwell v. Lever, [1897] 1 Ch. 32 181 Lewis, ^aj^orte, 1 Gl. & J. 69 266,349 V. Madocks, 8 Ves. 150 ; 7 E. R. 10 20 V. Nobbs, 8 Ch. D. 591 ; 47 L. J. Ch. 662 ; 26 W. E. 631 156, 198, 235, 237, 238 V. Trask, 21 Ch. D. 862 328 Ley «. Ley, 6 Eq. 174 180 xlii 

TABLE OF CASES. PAGE Lidiard, jBe, 14 Ch. D. 310 ; 28 W. E. 574 ; 49 L. J. Ch. 373 ; 42L. T. 621 307 Life Association of Scotland v, Siddal, 3 De G. F. & J. 58 ; 9 W. K. 541 ; 4 L. T. (n.s.) 311 ; 7 Jnr. (U.S.) 785 369 Lightbody, iJe, 33 W. K. 452 307 Liles V. Terry, [1895] 2 Q. B. 679 ; 65 L. J. Q. B. 34 ; 73 L. T. 428 ; 44W. E. 116 72 Lingard D. Bromley, 1 V. & B. 114 ; 12 K. E. 195 374 Linqnate •!). Ledger, 2 Giff. 137 70 Linyee, iJe, 23 Beav. 241 277,281 Lister v. Hodgson, 4 Eq. 30 ; 15 W. E. 547 73 Little D. Neil, 10 W. E. 692 21 Livesey v. Livesey, 3 Enss. 287 ; 6 L. J. Ch. 13 388 Lloyd, Se, 27 L. J. Ch. 246 298 V. Banks, 3 Ch. App. 448 394 V. Lloyd, 7 Bq. 458 ; 17 W. E. 702 ; 38 L. J. Ch. 458 ; 20L. T.898 104 V. , 2 Sim. (N.S.) 255 44, 50. 62 f. , 4 Dr. & War. 554 151 Lloyd's Bank v. Bullock, [1896] 2 Ch. 192 ; 65 L. J. Ch. 680 ; 74 L. T. 687 ; 44 W. K. 633 ; 12 T. L. E. 435 395 Loch V. Bayley, 4 Eq. 122 278 Lockhart v. Eeilly, 1 D. & J. 464 ; 25 L. J. Ch. 697 ; 4 W. E. 438 ; 27 L. T. 49 196, 200, 212, 213, 375, 377 Locking v. Parker, 8 Ch. App. 30 ; 42 L. J. Ch. 35 ; 27 L. T. 635 ; 21W. E. 113 366 Lofthouse, JJe, 29 Ch. D. 921 258 London, etc. Banking Co. r. London, etc. Bank, 21 Q. B. D. 542 ... 108 , etc. Co. V. Dnggan, [1893] A. C. 506 391, 394 & South Western Eail. Co. v. Gomm, 20 Ch. D. 562 ... 45 Joint Stock Bank v. Simmons, [1892] A. C. 201 399 Longley v. Longley, 13 Eq. 133 ; 20 W. E. 227 ; 41 L. J. Ch. 168 ; 25L.T. 736 104 Longton r. Wilsby, 76 L. T. 770 126,245 Longuet ?). Hockley, 22 L. T. 198 187 Lord and Enllerton, Be, [1896] 1 Ch. 228 ; 65 L. J. Ch. 184 ; 73 L. T. 689 ; 44 W. K. 195 135 Love, Be, Hill v. Spurgeon, 29 Ch. D. 348 323, 324 Low V. BoHTerie, [1891] 3 Ch. 82 ; 60 L. J. 594 ; 65 L. T. 533 : 156, 255 !). Peers, Wil. Op. & Jud. 375 44 Lowndes, ^e, 18 Q. B. D. 677 87 Lowry r. Fulton, 9 Sim. 115 ; 8 L. J. Ch. 314 ; 47 E. E. 188 ... 137 Lowther t. Carlton, 2 Atk. 242 398 Lncan (Earl of), iJe, Hardinge ?j. Cobden, 45 Ch. D. 470 33 Lnddy's Trustee v. Peard, 33 Ch. D. 500 251 Luke V. South Kensington Hotel Co., 11 Ch. D. 121 ; 27 W. E. 514 ; 48 L. J. Ch. 361 ; 40 L. T. 638 223, 234, 235 Lupt»n i). White, 15 Ves. 432 ; 10 E. E. 94 352 Lyddon u. Ellison, 19 Beav. 565 ; 2 W. E. 690 100 Lynch Blosse, Be, Eichards v. Lynch Blosse (1899), W.N. 27 ... 175, 344 Lynn v. Bearer, T. & E. 66 ; 23 E. E. 185 104 Lyon I). Mitchell, W. N. (1899), 27 178 Ljsaght V. Edwards, 2 Ch. D. 499 ; 24 W. E. 778 ; 45 L. J. Ch. 554 ; 34L. T. 787 287 Lyse V. Kingdom, 1 Coll. 184 348 Lyster i: Burroughs, 1 Dr. & W. 149 20 TABLE OF CASES. xliii •M. M., Ee, [1899] 1 Ch. 79 ; 68 L. J. Ch. 86 ; 47 W. E. 267 ; 79 L. T.'PAGE 459 Maberley r. Turton, 14 Ves. 499 Macdonald r. Irvine, 8 Ch. D., p. 112 ; 47L. J. Ch.494 302, 304 257,262 26W.R. 381; 38L.T. 155 ; 166, 169 64 L. J. Ch. 274; 81, 85, 87, 89 Mackay v. Douglas, 14 Eq. 406 ; 20 W. K. 652 ; 41 L. J. Ch. 539 ; 26L. T. 721 80 Mackenzie's Trusts, ^e, 28 Ch. D. 750 206 Mackie (!. Herbertson, 9 App. Cas. 303 31 Mackinnon r. Stewart, 1 Sim. (n.s.) 88 25 Mackintosh r. Pogose, [1895] 1 Ch. 505 ; 72 L. T. 251 ; 43 W. R. 247 Mackreth r. Symmons, 2 Wh. & Tu. 926 ; 15 Ves. 329 ; 10 R. R. 8.5 : 129, 391 Maclean, i2. Priddon, 1 D. M. & G. 335 295 I'. Eace, 1 Bar. 451 353 Milligan i} Mitchell, 1 My. & K. 446 ; 45 E. B. 218 358 Mills, Re, 37 Ch. D. 312 ; 40 Ch. D. 14 287, 313 V. Osborne, 7 Sim. 30 ; 40 E. E. 66 208 Milner, Re, 14 Eq. 245 279 I). Harewood (Lord), 18 Ves. 259 73 Milroy v. Lord, 4 De G.E. & J. 264 ; 35 L. J. Ch. 798 ; 6 L. T. 875 ; 8 Jur. (N.S.) 808 28, 37 Minors «. Battison, 1 App. Cas. 428 ; 35 L. T. 1 ... 272 Mitchell v. Homfray, 8 Q. B. D. 587 ; 29 W. E. 558 ! 71 Mitchelson v. Piper, 8 Sim. 64 ; 5 L. J. (n.s.) Ch. 294 ; 42 B. B. 104 ... ... ... ... ,,, ^^_ ^^^ _^^ 272 273 Mitford «. Beynolds, 16 Sim. 105 ... ... ..'. "' .. ' 64 Moggridge v. Thackwell, 3 Bro. C. C. 528 ; 6 E. E. 76 ... ... 19 Molton £!. Camroux, 2 Exch. 487 ; affirmed 4 Exch. 17 61 

TABLE OP CASES. xlv PAGE Molyneux r. Fletcher, [1898] 1 Q. B. 648 ; 67 L. J. Q. B. 392 ; 78 L. T. Ill ; 46 W. R. 576 247,356,381 Money Kyrle, Se, 49 W. R. 44 283 , Be, Money Kyrle «. Money Kyrle, [1900] W. N. 171... 281 Montefiore r. Brown, 7 H. L. Cas. 241 ; 4 Jur. (n.s.) 1201 25 r. Guedalla, W. N. (1868), p. 67 211 Montford (Lord) v. Cadogan (Lord), 17 Ves. 485 ; 19 Ves. 9 ; 13 R. R. 270 136,369 Moody, Be, [1895] 1 Ch. 101 271 Moore, Re, McAlplne v. Moore, 21 Ch. D. 778 303, 305 J'. Froud, 3 My. & Cr. 48 ; 45 E. R. 205 240 <. Knight, [1891] 1 Ch. 547 365,386 Moravian Society, Be. 26 Beav. 101 ; 4 Jnr. (n.s.) 703 ; 6 W. R. 8.51 291,297 More V. Mahow, 1 Ch. Ca. 34 391 < . More, 37 W. E. 414 87 Morgan, Sx pai-te, 10 Ves. 101 288 , Re, Pillgrem v. Pillgrem, 18 Ch. D. 93 ; 30 W. E. 223 ; 50 L. J. Ch. 834 ; 45 L. T. 183 125,398 r. Elford, 4 Ch. D. 352 ; 25 W. E. 136 382 V. Hardy, 13 App. Cas. 354 41 V. Malleson, 10 Eq. 475 ; 18 W. E. 1125 ; 39 L. J. Ch. 493 ; 22L. T. 595 .R6 r. Stephens, 3 6i£E. 226 .385 V. Swansea Local Board, 9 Ch. D. 582 ; 27 W. E. 283 ... 286 Morice r. Bishop of Durham, 9 Ves. 399 ; 10 Ves. 522 107 Morland r. Cook, 6 Eq. 252 397 Morley, Re, 10 Hare, 293 288 , Re, Morley v. Haig, [1895] 2 Ch. 738 ; 64 L. -T. Ch. 727 ; 73 L. T. 151 ; 44 W. R. 140 171, 177. 182 r. Loughnan, [1893] 1 Ch. 736 ; 62 L. J. 515 ; 68 L. T. 619 66, 68, 71 r. Morley, 25 L. J. Ch. 7 ; 5 De G. M. & G. 610 131 r. Reynoldson, 2 Hare, 570 44,51 Morris t: Livie, 1 Y. & C. C. C. 380 387 Morrison i). Morrison, 4 Kay & J. 458 .S20 Morse 1-. Royal, 12 Ves. .374 ; 8 E. E. 338 244 Mortimeri'. Ireland, 11 Jur. 721 ; 11 L. J. Ch. 416 288 Mortlock V. BuUer, 10 Ves. 309 ; 7 E. R. 417 160 MortonandHallett, i?^', 15 Ch. D. 1J3 289,290 Moseley, J?e, 18 W. R. 126 ; 21 L. T. 384 332 Mosley v. Ward, 11 Ves. 581 ; 8 R. R. 249 344 Moss, ^a; /iarte, 3 Drew. & Sm. 599 ' 130 V. Cooper, IJ. & H. 352 58 Motz r. Moreau, 13 M. P. C. 376 73 Moxham r. Grant, [1900] 1 Q. B. 92 133 Moyle V. Moyle, 2 Euss. & M. 710 ; 34 R. R. 186 156, 198, 233 Mucklow «. EuUer, Jac. 198 ; 23 E. E. 29 137,367 Mnffet, iJe, Jones r. Mason, 39 Ch. D. 534 180 Mulin D. Blagrave, 25 Beav. 137 217 Munch V. Cockerell, 5 My. & Cr. 179 ; 6 L. J, Ch. (N.S.) 9 ; 42 E. E. 165 234 Mnrch «. Russel, 3 My. & Cr. 31 369 Murphy, Be, [1900] 1 Ir. R. 145 258 V. Doyle, 29 L. R. Ir. 333 207 Mus.TOorie Bank v. Raynor, 7 App. Cas. 321 ; 46 L. T. 633 ... 15, 18, 23 Mutton D. Peate, [1900] 2 Ch. 79 _ 3.55,393 Mutual Provident Society r. Macmillan, 14 App. Cas. 596 36 xlvi TABLE OF CASES. PAGB Mycock V. Beatson, 13 Ch. D. 384 ; 28 W. R. 319 ; 49 L. J. Ch. 127 ; 42L. T. 141 132 N. Nail V. Punter, 5 Sim. 555 ; 35 R. R. 188 Nandick v. Wilkes, Gil. Eq. Rep. 114 ... Nanney v. Morgan, 37 Ch. D. 346 V. Williams, 22 Beav. 452 369, 370 97 33 71 317 141 146 150 399 Nash, Re, 16 Ch. D. 503 ; 29 W. R. 294 0. Allen, 1 H. & C. 167 -0. Coates, 3 B. & Ad. 839 ; 37 R. R. 552 ». Preston, Cro. Car. 190 Natal Investment Co., Re, 3 Ch. App. 355 National Finance Co., Re, 3 Ch. App. 791 ; 18 L. T. 895 ; 16 W. R. 994 321 National Permanent Building Society, Re, 43 Ch. D. 431 206 Naylor v. Amitt, 1 Russ. & M. 501 ; 32 R. R. 254 260 Neale v. Davis, 5 De G. M. & G. 258 ; 2 W. R. 358 238, 239 0. Neale, 79 L. T. 629 ; 13 T. L. R. 20 61, 111 Needham, Re, 1 Jo. & Lat. 34 138 Neil, Re, Hemming v. Neil, 62 L. T. 649 282 V. Morley, 9 Vea. 478 61 Neligan v. Roche, Ir. Rep. 7 Eq. 332 239 Nelson e. Bridport, 8 Beav. 574 40,43 Nettlefdd, Re, 59 L. T. 315 274 Neville v. Portescue, 16 Sim. 333 168 Nevr V. Jones, 1 Mac. & G. 688 n 226, 241 Nevp. Prance and Garrand's Trustee v. Hunting, [1897] 2 Q, B. 19 ; 66 L. J. Q. B. 554 ; 76 L. T. 742 ; 45 W. R. 577 ; 13 T. L. R. 397 26,35,52 New Zealand, etc. Co., Re, [1893] 1 Ch. 403 ; 62 L. J. Ch. 262 ; 68L. T. 593 314 Newen, Re, Newen v. Barnes, [1894] 2 Ch. 297 ; 63 L. J. Ch. 763 ; 70 L. T. 653 ; 43 W. R. 58 283,296,308 Newman «. Newman, 28 Ch. D. 674 ; 16 R. R. 386 251 Newsome «). Plowera, 30 Beav. 461 238 Newstead ». Searles, 1 Atk. 264... 31 Newton t'. Askew, 11 Beav. 145, 152 252,253 V. Newton, 4 Ch. App. 143 ; 17 W. R. 238 ; 19 L. T. 588 ; 38L. J. Ch. 145 398 Nichels, Re, Nichels v. Nichels, [1898] 1 Ch. 630 ; 67 L. J. Uh. 406 • 78 L. T. 379 ; 46 W. R. 422 164 165 Nicholson I!. Pield, [1893] 2 Ch. 511 299 1). Knowles, 5 Madd. 47 ; 21 R. R. 276 239 -c. Tuttin, 2 Kay & J. 23 25 Nickisson D. Cockhill, 3 D. & S. 622 \ 259 Nightingale v. Lawson, 2 Bro. C. C. 440 .. 179 Noad v. Backhouse, 2 Y. & C. C. C. 529 '". '.' 356 Noel ». Jevon, Preem. 43... ... ... ... I5O 151 Norcutt f. Dodd, Cr. & Ph. 100 '.'/. ... ' 75 Norfolk's (Duke of) Case, 3 Ch. Ca. 35 ; 6 Ch. Ca. 5 ; 1 Vei-'n. 164 : 43 Norris, jEte ^MJiu, 4 Ch. App. 280 3^8 , i?e, Allen i-. Norris, 27 Ch. D. 333 .'.'.' 296,307 r. Wright, 14 Beav. 308 196, 200, 212,' 213 North t. Crompton, 1 Ch. Ca. 196 io4 TABLE OP OASES. xlvii Northage, Re, Ellis v. Barfield, 60 L. J. Ch. 488 Northern Counties, etc. Insurance Co. v. Whipp, 26 Ch. D. 482 Norton v. Johnstone, 30 Ch. JD. 649 r. Pritchard, Reg. Lib. B. (1844), 771 Nunneley r. Nunneley, April 18th, 1883 PAGE 161,162 7,90 178,180 ... 199 ... 249 0. Occleston r. FuUalove, 9 Ch. App. 147 ; 22 "W. R. 305 ; 43 L. J. Ch. 297 ; 29 L. T. 785 49 Oceanic, etc. Co. v. Sutherberry, 16 Ch. D. 237 196 Official Receiver v. Jackson, [1899] A. C. 419 ; 68 L. J. Q. B. 866 ; 80 L. T. 841 ; 16 T. L. R. 418 87 Ogle, Ex parte, 8 Ch. App. 715 ; 21 W. R. 938 268, 341 Oldham v. Oldham, 3 Eq. 404 ; 15 W. R. 300 ; 36 L. J. Ch. 205 ... 281 OliTe, Re, Olive v. "Westerman, 34 Ch. D. 70 ; 56 L. J. Ch. 75 ; 55L. T. 583 214 Oliver v. Court, 8 Pr. Ch. 165 ; 22 R. R. 720 195, 223, 225 Onslow v. Wallis, 1 M. & G. 506 153 Ord i;. Noel, 5 Madd: 440 ; 21 R. R. 328 195 «. White, 3 Beav. 357 391 Orr «. Newton, 2 Cox, 276 : 197 Orrett «. Corser, 21 Beav. 52 193 O'Rorke v. Bolingbroke, 2 App. Cas. 814 ; 26 W. R. 239 70 Osborne and Rowlett, Re, 13 Ch. D., p. 789 ; 28 W. R. 365 ; 49 L. J. Ch. 310 ; 38 L. T. 195 288,289,290 Osgood V. Strode, 2 P. Wms. 245 29 Osmond v. Fitzroy, 3 P. Wms. 129 66 Ottley I'. Gilby, 8 Beav. 602 "...252,2.53,255 Ovey t>. Ovey, [1900] 2 Ch. 524 158 Owthwaite, J?e, Owthwaitei). Taylor, [1891] 3 Ch. 494 ... 158,204 Owen V. Delamere, 15 Eq. 134 ; 21 W. R. 218 ; 42 L. J. Ch. 232 ; 27L. T. 647 151 Owens, iie, 47 L. T. 61 190,192,268 Packman and Moss, Re, 1 Ch. D. 214 ; 24 W. R. 170 ; 45 L. J. Ch. 54 ; 34 L. T. 100 288 Paddon v. Richardson. 7 De G. M. & G. 563 ; 26 L. T. 33 1192 Page, Re, Jones v. Morgan, [1893] 1 Ch. 304 ; 62 L. J. 41 W. R. 357 Paine, .He, 33 W. R. 564 Palairet v. Carew, 32 Beav. 567 ; 11 W. R. 449 ; 8 L. 9 Jur. (N.S.) 426 Palk, iJe, 41 W. R. 28 Palmer ii. Young, 1 Vem. 276 Papillon V. Voice, 2 P. Wms. 471 Parker, Be, [1894] 1 Ch. 707 and Beech, Re, 56 L. J. Ch. 358 ; 56 L. T. 95 ; 353 V. Bolton, 5L. J.'(N.S.)'Ch. 98 ;'42 R. R. 285 19 Jur. 135, 197 Ch. 592 ; ..252,253.364 '306 T. 139; ..199,291,328 376 12799 285 35 W. R. ... 392 ... 99 xlviii TABLE OF CASES. PAGE Parker i). Calcraft, 6 Madd. 11 130 V. Carter, 4 Hare, 409 91 Parnell r. Steadman, 1 C. & E. 153 82,83 Parrott, iJe, 30 W. E. 97 307 , ife, Walter ». Parrott, 33 Ch. D. 274 97 V. Sweetland, 3 My. & K. 655 ; 41 R. R. 164 129 Parsons, Be, Stockley -ii. Parsons, 62 L. T. 929; 45 Ch. D. 51 : 60, 356 Pass V. Dimdas, 29 W. R. 332 ; 43 L. T. 665 368 Paterson D. Paterson, 2 Eq. 31 314 Patman r. Harland, 17 Ch. D. 355 ; 29 W. E. 207 ; 50 L. J. Ch. 642 ; 44L. T. 72S 396 Patrick, iJe, Bills «. Tatham, [1891] 1 Ch. 82 32,34 V. Simpson, 24 Q. B. D. 128 ; 59 L. J. Q. B. 7 ; 61 L. T. 686 : 366 Patten v. Edmonton Guardians, 31 W. E. 785 ; 52 L. J. Ch. 787 ; 48L. T. 870 351,353 Patterson t. Woolen, 2 Ch. D. 586 328 Paul V. Compton, 8 Ves. 380 ; 7 R. R. 81 22 Paul w. Paul, 20 Ch. D. 742 ; 30 W. B. 801 33 Pawlett D. Att.-Gen., Hard. 494 43 Pawson V. Brown. 13 Ch. D. 202 ; 28 W. E. 652 ; 49 L. J. Ch. 193 ; 41L. T. 339 61,111 Payne, He, Kibble v. Payne, 54 L. T. 840 126, 246 V. Evans, 18 Eq. 356 253 Peacock, iJe, 14 Ch.D. 212 315 !;. Burt, 4 L. J. Ch. 33 398 V. Colling, 33 W. R. 528 301 V. Monk, 2 Ves. sen. 190 63 Peake, He, [1894] 3 Ch. 520 ; 71 L. T. 371 ; 42 W. R. 687 308 Peard v. Kekewich, 15 Beav. 173 100 Pearks 1). Moseley, 5 App. Cas. 714 46 Pearse r. Gifeen, 1 Jac. & W. 140 252 Pearson. Se, 3 Ch. D. 807 ; 25 W. R. 126 ; 35 L. T. 68 ... 48, 81 1, JJe, Oxley ^. Scarth, 51 L. T. 672 228 V. Amicable Ass. Co. 27 Beav. 229 ; 7 W. R. 629 33 Pease, -Ba- ^orte, 19 Ves. 46 149 PecheU-. Fowler, 3 Anst. 550 ; 3 E. E. 627 195,3.58 Pemberton v. Gill, 1 Drew. & Sm. 266 380 Pennell «. Deffell, 4 De G. & M. G. 372 ; 1 W. E. 499 3.52 Perrins v. Bellamy, [1898] 2 Ch. 524 ; 68 L. J. Ch. 397 ; 47 W. R. 417 ; 80 L. T. 478 361 Perry, Ee, 2 Curt. 655 137 Peters i\ Lewes and E. Grinstead Rail. Co. 18 Ch. D. 429 279 Peterson v. Peterson, 3 Eq. Ill 388 Pethybridge ». Burrows, 53 L. T. 5 37 Petre v. Petre, 1 Drew. 371 ; 1 W. E. 362 ; 2 L. T. 136 366 Peyton, j;e, 7 Eq. 463 202 Phelps, Se, 31 Ch. D. 351 ; 54 L. T. 480 291, 303 Phillips, iJe, Cr. & Ph. 147 .". 317 v. James, 2 De G. & Sm. 404 ; 13 W. E. 934 97 II. Mullings, 7 Ch. App. 244 ; 20 W. E. 129 ; 41 L. J. Ch. 211 . 66—68 1). Phillips, 29 Ch. D. 673 126 -, 4 De G. P. & J. 208 ... S91 K.Probyn, [1899] 1 Ch. 811 ; 68 L. J. Ch. 401 ; 80 L. T. 513 110 Phipps r. Lovegrove, 16 Eq. 80 156 Pickardr. Anderson, 13 Eq. 608; 26 L. T. 725 ... 208 Pickering v. Pickering, 4 My. & Cr. 289 '. 165 TABLE OF CASES. xlix PAGE Pickering ti. Stamford, 2 Ves. 272 372 Piddo3ke V. Bart, [1891] 1 Ch. 313 ; 63 L. J. Ch. 216 ; 70 L. T. 553 ; 42W. R. 218 127,131 Piercy !.'. Roberts, 1 My. & K. 1 ; 36 R. R. 239 ; 2 L. J. (N.S.) Ch. 17 48 Pilcher V. Rawlins, 7 Cli. App. 259 ; 41 L. J. Ch. 485 ; 20 W. R. 281; 25L.T. 921 391,392 Pilling, i?e, 26 Ch. 1). 432 312 Pine V. Cooper, 17 Bear. 187 182 Pitcairn, Re, Brandreth u. Colvin, [1896] 2 Ch. 199 ; 65 L. J. Ch. 120 ; 73 L. T. 430 ; 44 W. R. 200 168, 177 Pitt i'. Pelham, Freem. 134 19 PixtonandTong, iJe, 46W. R. 187 289 Platamore ('. Staple, Coop. G. 250 109 Playfair 1). Cooper, 17 Beav. 187 180 Plowright B. Lambert, 52 L. T. 646 247 Plymptou r. Dispensary, 106 Mass. 544 182 Pocock ». Beddington, 5 Ves. 794 208 Pole -0. Pole, 1 Ves. sen. 76 ; 2 Drew. & Sm. 420 117, 127 Poole *'. Pass, 1 Bear. 600 187 Pooley V. Quilter, 4 Drew. 189 ; 6 W. R. 402 ; 27 L. J. Ch. 374 ; 31 L. T. 64 ; 4 Jur. (N.S.) 345 219 Pope, iJe, Sharp e. Marshall, [19011 1 Ch. 64 178 Porter, Re, Coulson i\ Capper, [1892] 3 Ch. 481 ; 61 L. J. Ch. 688 ; 67L. T. 823 281 r. Baddeley, 5 Ch. D. 542 166,169 Postlethwaite, Re, Postlethwaite v. Rickman, 37 W. R. 200 ; 60 L. T. 514 248 Potts V. Britton, 11 Eq. 433 ; 19 W. R. 651 ; 24 L. T. 409 208 Powellr. Hulkes, .33 Ch. D. 552 217 V. London and Prov. Bank, [1893] 2 Ch. 555 ; 41 W. R. 545 391,399 !!. Matthews, 1 Jur. (N.S.) 973 313 r. Powell, [1900] 1 Ch. 243 72 c. Price, 2 P. Wms. 535 97 Pratt, Re, W. N. (1886), 144 ; 34 W. R. 757 ; 55 L. T. 313 ... 310 r. Sladden, 14 Beav. 193 104 Prevost V. Clarke, 2 Madd. 458 22 Price v. Berrington, 2 M. & G. 486 61 D. Blakemore, 6 Beav. 507 355 V. Jenkins, 5 Ch. D. 619 ; 26 W. R. 427 ; 37 L. T. 51 ; 46L. J. Ch. 85 92 V. Price, 42 L. T. 636 342 Prichard «). Ames, Turn. & R. 222 19 Pride !•. Fooks, 2 Beav. 430 328 Priest V. Appleby, 42 Ch. D. 351 ; 61 L. T. 146 ; 38 W. R. 159 ... 214 Priestley r. Ellis, [1897] 1 Ch. 489 ; 66 L. J. Ch. 240 ; 76 L. T. 187 ; 45 W. R. 442 25, 26 Priestman i: Tindall, [1897] 2 Ch. 825 ; 24 Beav. 244 375 Printers, etc. Society, Me, [1899] 2 Ch. 184 ; 68 L. J. Ch. 537 ; 47 W. R. 619 ; 15 T. L. R. 394 107 Proctor V. Robinson, 35 Beav. 329 ; 15 W. R. 138 ; 15 L. T. 431 ... 50 Prodgers r. Langham, Keb. 486 89 Pryce v. Bury, 2 Dr. 42 ; 2 W. R. 87, 216 ; 22 L. T. 324 130 Pryor, Re, 35 L. T. 202 236 Pngh, Re, W. N. (1887), p. 143 207 Pumphrey, Re, Worcester, etc. Bg. Co. t'. Blick, 22 Ch. D. 255 ... 324, 327, 352 1 TABLE OP CASES. PAGE Pybus r. Smith, 3 B. C. C. 340 281 Pye, ^,5^arte,18 Ves. 140; 2 W.&T. L. Ca. 366 28 E. Kaby v. Eidehalgh, 7 De G. M. & G. 104 ; 3 W. R. 344 ; 25 L. T. 19 ; 19 Jar. 363 161,379 Rackstraw, iie, 52 L. T. 612 ; 33 W. R. 559 312 Eadclifee, Re, Earopeau Ass. Society v. Radcliffe, 7 Ch. D. 733 ... 274 Raikes'i). Raikes, 35Beav.403 306 Ramskill v. Edwards, 31 Ch. D. 100 : 34 W. R. 96 ; 53 L. T. 949 ... 376 Randall v. Errington, 10 Ves. 427 ; 8 R. E. 18 244 Eanelagh (Lord), iJe, 26 Ch. D. 590 126,245 Ratcliff. Me, [1892] 2 Ch. 352 ; 67 L. J. Ch. 562 ; 78 L. T. 834 ... 340 Rathbone, Re, 2 Ch. D. 483 ; 45 L. J. Ch. 531 ; 24 W. R. 566 : 305, 315 Raybould Se, Raybould v. Turner, [1900] 1 Ch. 199 322 Kaysdale v. Raysdale, 68 Miss. 92 57 Redding, Jle, Thompson v. Redding, [1897] 1 Ch. 876 ; 66 L. J. Ch. 460 ; 76 L. T. 339 ; 45 W. R. 457 185 Redington -!). Redington, 3 Ridge, 197 ; 12 R. E. 5 117,131 Redman r. Rymer, 60 L. T. 385 322,394 Reese River Co. v. Atwell, 7 Eq. 347 ; 17 W. R. 601 ; 20 L. T. 163 : 79 R. I). Stapleton, 4 B. & S. 629 ... 151 E. V. Sterry, 12 A. & E. 84 151 Eehden D. Wesley, 29 Beav. 213 233 Eeid «. Eeid, 31 Ch. D. 402 60 Eevel i). "Watkinson, 1 Ves. 93 180 Reynell v. Spry, 1 De G. M. & G. 660 109 Reynolds I). Godlee, John. 536 122,123 Richards, He, Shenstone v. Brock, 36 Ch. D. 541 28 V. Delbridge, 18 Eq, 11 ; 22 W. R. 584 ; 43 L. J. Ch. 459 28.36 Richardson, Re, Morgan v. Eichardson, [1896] 1 Ch. 512 ; 65 L. J. Ch. 512 ; 74 L. T. 12 ; 44 W. E. 279 164 , Re. Eichardson v. Eichardson, [1900] W. N. 3 ; [1900] 2 Ch. 778 281,282 r. Eichardson, 3 Eq. 686 ; 15 W. E. 690 ; 36 L. J. Ch. 653 36 Richerson, Re, Scales v. Heyhoe, [1892] 1 Ch. 379 ; 61 L. J. Ch. 202 ; 66 L. T. 174 120,124 Eickard v. Robson, 31 Beav. 244 62 Ricketts r, Eicketts, 64 L. T. 263 381 Eider «. Kidder, 10 Ves. 360 75,108,113 Ridler, Re. 22 Ch. D. 74 ; 31 W. R. 93 ; 52 L. J. Ch. 343 ; 48 L. T. 396 83,91 Rigden t'. Vallier, 3 Atk. 735 114 Rigley, i^f, 1 W. E. 342 64 Eingham «. Lee, 15 Sim. 400 130 Eiper'iJ. Moulton, 72 Ch. 155 ., ,,, 64 Eitson V. Stordy, 3 Sm. & G. 230 62 Roberts, Re, 17 W. R. 639 ; L. E. 4 Ch. App. 56l': 38 L. J. Ch. 488 333 , Be, Knight v. Eoberts, 76 L. T. 479 ... ... 361 Robinson r. Harkin, [1896] 2 Ch. 415 ; 65 L. J. Ch. 773 • 74 L t" 777 ; 44 W. E.702 221, 223, 224,' 376, 377 TABLE OF CASES. ll PAGE Kobinson r. Pett, 3 P. Wms. 251 130, 13i, 240 i'. Preston, 4 Kay & J. 505 114 V. Robinson, 1 De G. M. & G. 252 191, 197, 201, 343 Robson V. PUght, i De G. J. & S. 608 ; 13 W. R. 393 ; 34 L. J. Ch. 226, 311 ; 12 L. T. 725 ; 11 Jur. (N.S.) 147 19, 28, 224 Rochefoucauld v. BoUstead, [1897] 1 Ch. 196 ; [1898] 1 Ch. 550 ; 66 L. J. Ch. 44 ; 75 L. T. 502 ; 13 T. L. R. 118 : 45 W. R. 272 53,58,113,133,243,365 Kodbard i: Cooke, 25 W. R. 555 ; 36 L. T. 504 237 Rogers v. Rogers, 3 P. Wms. 193 105 Rolfe «. Gregory, 11 Jur. (N.S.) 98 ; 13 W. R. 355 ; 34 L. J. Ch. 274 ; 12 L. T. 162 382,383 Rollfe V. Budder, Bunb. 187 19 Romford Canal Co., JRe, 24 Ch. D. 85 399 Roots r. Wmiamson, 38 Ch. D. 485 36 Roper Curzon v. Roper Curzon, 11 Eq. 452 ; 19 W. R. 519 ; 24 L. T. 406 262 Rose V. Bartlett, Cro. Car. 292 285 r. Watson. 10 H. L. Cas. 672 132 Rosher t: WilUams, 20 Eq. 210 ; 23 W. R. 561 ; 44 L. J. Ch. 419 ; 32L. T. 387 91 Roth, Be, Goldberger v. Roth, 74 L. T. 50 201, 235 Rowbotham i: Dunnett, 8 Ch. D. 430 ; 26 W. R. 529 ; 47 L. J. Ch. 449 ; 38 L. T. 278 113 Rowland i'. Morgan, 13 Jur. 23 335 D. Witherden, 3 M. & G. 568 228 Rowley f. Adams, 2 H. L. Cas. 725 ; 2 L. J. (N.S.) Ch. 143 192 RowUs c. Bebb, [1900] 2 Ch. 107 171,177 Royds V. Royds, 14 Beav. 54 214 Royle, Be, 43 Ch. D. 18 331 Rndkin v. Dolman, 35 L. T. 791 52, 107 Rushworth's Case, Preem. 13 127 Rnssell, Ex parte, Butterworth, Be, 19 Ch. D. 588 ; 30 W. R. 584 ; 51 L. J. Ch. 521 ; 46 L. T. 113 79,80 Be, Dorell v. Dorell, [1895] 2 Ch. 698 ; 64 L. J. Ch. 891 ; 73 L. T. 195 ; 44 W. R. 100 100 17. Jackson, 10 Hare, 204 58 ». Russell, 2 Wh. & Tu. 276 130 r. Wakefield, etc. Co., 20 Eq. 474 133 RyalUi. Ryall, 1 Atk. 59 ; cited Amb. 412 113 Ryderi). Bickerton, 3 Sw. 81 n. (a) 208,252 S. Sackville West %. Holmesdale, 4 H. L. Cas. 543 ; 39 L. J. Ch. 505 94, 95, i)8 Saffron.Walden %. Rayner, 14 Ch. D. 406 ; 28 W. R. 681 ; 49 L. J. Ch. 465;43L. T. 3 395 Saloway r. Strawbridge, 1 Kay & J. 371 ; 3 W. R. 335 ; 24 L. J. Ch. 893 289 Salmon, .R(!, Priest r. Uppleby, 42 Ch. D. 351 347,348 Salter «. Cavanagh, 1 Dr. & Wal. 668 366 Salusbury r. Denton, 3 Kay & J. 529 21 Salway v. Salway, 2 Rnss. & M. 215 ; 9 L. J. Ch. 152 224 Sampson & Wall, iJe, 25 Ch. D. 482 59 Sanders «. Miller, 25 BeaT. 154 179 Sandford 1-. Keech, Sel. Ca. Ch. 61 125,245 d 2 Hi TABLE OF CASES. PAGE Sanguinetti v. Stuckey's Banking Co., [1895] 1 Ch. 176 ; 64 L. J. Ch. 181 ; 71 L. T. 872 ; 43 W. R. 154 86 Sarley v. Clockmakers' Co., 1 B. C. C. 81 19 Satter ^. Bird, 103 Pa. St. 40.S 57 Saunders c. Dehen, 2 Vern. 272 89,400 r. Vautier, Cr. & Ph. 240 276,279,292 Saunderson, ^e, 3 Kay & J. 497 48 Savile «. Couper, 35 W. R. 829 ; 56 L. T. 907 ..' 319 Sawyer B. Sawyer, 28 Ch. D. 595 373,380 Sayre r. Hughes, 5 Eq. 376 ; 16 W. E. 662 ; 37 L. J. Ch. 401 ; 18L. T. 347 118 Scales V. Baker, 28Beav. 91 ; 8 W. R. 287 ; 2 L. T. 659 351 Sehrieber «. Dinkel, 54 L. J. Ch. 241 92 Scott V. Beoher, 4 Pr. 346 ; 18 R. R. 722 356 «. Surman, Willes, 404 354 Scrivener r. Smith, 8 Eq. 310 187 Sculthorpe v. Tipper, 13 Eq. 232 ; 20 W. E. 276 ; 41 L. J. Ch. 266 ; 26L. T. 119 197 Seagram v. Knight, 2 Ch. App. 630 ; 15 W. R. 1152 ; 36 L. J. Ch. 918;17L. T. 47 257,260,263 SeagraTe D. Seagrave, 13 Ves. 443 ; 9 R. R. 203 70 Searle, Me, Searle v. Baker, [1900] 2 Ch. 829 174 Sellack ^). Harris, 5 Vin. Abr, 521 56 Sewel), Re, 11 Eq. 80 ; 19 W. R. 220 ; 40 L. J. Ch. 135 ; 23 L. T. 835 : 168 D. King, 14 Ch. D. 179 ; 28 W. R. 344 33 Shafto, iZe, 29 Ch. D. 247 299 v. Adams, 4 Giff. 492 40 Shallcross •)'. Wright, 12 Beav. 505 121 Shapland v. Smith, 1 Bro. C. C. 75 ; 1 R. R. 522 140 Sharp, Me, Rickett v. Sharp, 45 Ch. D. 286 ; 62 L. T. 677 ; 60L. J. Ch. 38 208 V. Poy, 4 Ch. App. 85 ; 17 W. R. 65 ; 19 L. T. 541 372 Sharpe, Me, Masonic, etc. Co. v. Sharpe, [1892] 1 Ch. 154 ... 132, 133 V. St. Sareur, 7 Ch. App. 351 ; 20 W. R. 269 ; 41 L. J. Ch. 576 ; 26 L. T. 142 62,63 Sharpies v. Adams, 32 BeaT. 213 ; 11 W. R. 450 400 Shaw r. Foster, L. R. 5 H. L. 338 ; 20 W. R. 907 ; 42 L. J. Ch. 49 ... 128 «. Lawless, 5 CI. & F. 129 ; 47 R. R. 41 26 «. Weigh, 2 Str. 798 147 Sheffield (Lord) o. London Joint Stock Bank, 13 App. Cas. 333 ... 399 Sheldon, J?e, Nixon ?'. Sheldon, 39 Ch. D. 50 170,173 Shelley's Case, 1 Co. 88b... 96, 99, 146, 148, 149 Shelmerdine, Be, 33 L. J. Ch. 476 ... .t." 304 Shepherd 1-. Mouls, 4 Hare, 500, 504 343 Sheppard, i?e, W. N. (1888), p. 234 300 , i?e, 4 De F. & J. 423 316 Sherwood, Me, 3 BeaT. 338 240 Shewin v. Vanderhorst, 2 Russ. & M. 75 ; 32.R. R. 219 ... ... 272 Shield, iie,Pethybridge «. Burrow, 53 L..T. 5 36 Shore II. Shore, 4 Drew. 510 179 182 Shortridge, Me, [1895] 1 Ch. 278 ; 64 L. J. Oh. 191 ; 71 L. T. 799 ; ' 43W.R.257 294,301 Shurmer v. Sedgwick, 24 Ch. D. 597 ; 31 W. R. 884 : 49 L. T. 156 : 53 L. J. Ch. 87 92 Sidmouth v. Sidmouth, 2 Beav. 455 ... " 117 Sigger ?). Evans, 5 El. & Bl. 367 .".' 25 Silkstone, &c. Co^j.Edey, [1900] ICh. 167 247,248 Sisson V. Shaw, 9 Ves. 288 257,262 TABLE OF CASES. liii PAGE Skeats !-. Allen, 37 W. R. 778 296 r. Evans, i2 Ch. D. 522 ; 61 L. T. 500 296 Sleeman ;;. Wilson, 13 Eq. 36 ; 20 W. R. 109 ; 25 L. T. 408 371 Smallwood f. Ratter, 9 Hare, 24 335 Smart r. Prujean, 6 Yea. 560 56 Smethnrst r. Hastings, 30 Ch. D. 490 ; 33 W. R. 496 ; 52 L.T. 567 : 200, 213, 214 Smirthwaite,JJ(', llEq. 251 303 Smith, i;e, 9 Eq. 374 179,187 , Me, Arnold i: Smith, [1896] 1 Ch. 171 167 , i?e, Champ K. Marshallsay, 64 L. T. 13 37 , Ee, Daridson i: Myrtle, [1896] 2 Ch. 590 ; 65 L. J. Ch. 761 ; 74 L. T. 810 ; 45 W. R. 29 208 , Se, Henderson-Roe v. Hitchins, 42 Ch. D. 302 271 , Re, Smith v. Thompson, [1896] 1 Ch. 71 ; 65 L.J. Ch. 159 ; 73 L. T. 604 ; 44 W. R. 270 209, 246, 257 r. Bolden, 33 BeaY. 262 328 c. CherriU, 4 Eq. 390 ; 15 W. R. 919 ; 16 L. T. 517 79 V. Cooke, [1891] A. C. 297 ; 60 L. J. Ch. 607 ; 65 L. T. 1 ; 40W. R. 67 25,106 f. Cremer, 24 W. R. 51 254 V. Hurst, 10 Hare, 30 25 c. Matthews, 3 De G. F. & J. 139 ; 30 L. J. Ch. 445 ; 9 W. R. 644;4L. T. 266 54 II. Smith, 5 Ch. App. 342 45 i: , 11 C. B. (N.S.) 121 141 r. , 21 Bear. 385 .308 «. Wheeler, 1 Mod. 17 275 Snowdon v. Dales, 6 Sim. 524 ; 3 L. J. Ch. (n.s.) 188 ; 38 R. R. 173 : 44, 48, 49, 281 Soar r. Ashwell, [1893] 2 Q. B. 390 ; 69 L. T. 585 ; 42 W. R. 165 : 132, 133, 385, 386 r. Poster, 4 Kay & J. 152 ; 6 W. R. 265 ; 4 Jur. (N.S.) 406 ... 114 Societe Generale v. Walker, 11 App. Cas. 20 ; 34 W. R. 662 ; 55 L. J. Q. B. 569 ; 54 L. T. 389 36 Somerset, ^e, W. N. (1887), p. 122 293,304 , Me, Somerset r. Poulett (Lord), [1894] 1 Ch. 231 ; 62 L. J. Ch. 720 ; 68 L. T. 613 214, 215, 365, 375, 379 Soper r. Arnold, 14 App. Cas. 429 • 159 Southampton (Lord) w. Hertford (Lord), 2 V. & B. 54, 65 45 Speight V. Gaunt, 22 Ch. D. 727 ; 9 App. Cas. 1 ; 32 W. R. 435 ; 53 L. J. Ch. 419 188, 189, 221, 222, 225, 227, 228, 231 Spence «. Spence, 10 W. R. 605 141 Spencer, iJe, 51 L. J. Ch. 271 133,393 v. Slater, 4 Q. B. D. 104 ; 27 W. R. 134 ; 48 L. J. Q. B. 204 ; 39 L. T. 424 ? 84 V. Topham, 22 Beav. 573 ; 28 L. T. 56 251 Spink -ii. Lewis, 3 B. C. C. 355 107 Spirrett v. Willows, 3 De G. J. & S. 293 ; 14 W. R. 941 ; 34 L. J. Ch. 365 ; 11 L. T. 720 79 Sporler. Bnmaby, 10 Jur. (N.S.) 1142 217 Sprague, i?e, Miley I). Cape, 43 L. T. 236 21 Spring r. Pride, 4 De G. J. & S. 395 245 Springett v. Dashwood, 2 Giff. 521 ; 3 L. T. 542 ; 7 Jur. (N.S.) 93 : 252, , Jennings, 10 Eq. 488 ; 19 W. R. 575 ; 40 L. J. Ch. 348 ; 253 24L. T. 643 113 Spurgeon o). Collier, 1 Eden, 65 397 ]iv TABLE OF CASES. PAGE St. John c. St. John, 11 Ves. 535 1^9 St. Paul v. Dudley, 15 Ves. 172 ; 10 R. R. 57 ... .•• 1^1 Stacey v. Elph, 1 My. & K. 195 ; 2 L. J. Ch. 50 ; 36 R. R. 304 : 135, 137^ Stackhouse*. Barnston, 10Ve9.496 ,Qo"ii, iVo 111 Stafford V. Flddon, 23 Beav. 386 198, 341, 312, 344 «. Stafford, 1 De G. & J. 202 ... •• •• i^"* Stamford (Lord) Be, Payne v. Stamford, [1896] 1 Ch. 28S ; 65 L. J. Ch. 134 ; 73 L. T. 539 ; 44 W. R. 247 : 297, 305, 307, 328 (Earl) V. Hobart, 3 Bro. P. C, Tarl. ed. 31—33 95 Standing n. Bowrlng, 31 Ch. D. 282 ; 55 L. J. Ch. 218 ; 54 L. T. 191 ; 34 W. R. 204 -^^ ,o, Stanford II. Roberts, [19011 1 Ch. 440 187 Stanley 1). Lennard, 1 Eden, 95 ••• • 94 1>. Stanley, 7 Ch. D. 589 ; 26 W. R. 310 ; 47 L. J. Ch. 2o6 ;_ 37 L. T. 777 ... ... ... ••. •• ••• .372. 383, 389 Stanniar i). Evans,' 34 Ch. b. 470 26 Stead, Re, Witham v. Andrew, [1900] 1 Cb. 237 53, 58 L «. Mellor, 5 Ch. D. 225 ; 25 W. K. 508 ; 36 L. T. 498 ... 22 Steen, i?e, Steen B. Peebles. 25 L. R. Ir. 544 260 Stenning, Re, Wood v. Stenning, [1895] 2 Ch. 433 ; 73 L. T. 207 ... 355 Stewart v. Sanderson, 10 Eq. 26 ; 18 W. R. 278 ; 39 L. J. Ch. 337 ; 22L. T. 10 209 Stickney?). Sewell, IMy.&Cr. 8;43R. R. 129 214,238,249 Stock V. McAvoy, 15 Eq. 55 ; 21 W. R. 521 ; 42 L. J. Ch. 230 ; 27L. T. 441 117 Stocken, Re, Jones v. Hawkins, 38 Ch. D. 319 337 V. Dawes, 6 Beav. 371 242 Stokes, Re, 13 Eq. 333 ; 20 W. R. 396 ; 41 L. J. Ch. 290 ; 26 L. T. 181 292,293,334 V. Prance, [1898] 1 Cb. 212 ; 67 L. J. Ch. 69 ; 77 L. T. 595 ; 46W. R. 183 159,213,385 Stokoe !;. Cowan, 29 Beav. 637 75 Stone «. Lidderdale, 2 Anst. 533 ; 3 R. R, 622 43 Stonor !). Curwen, 5 Sim. 268 ; 35 R. R. 156 96 Stott V. Milne, 25 Ch. D. 710 179, 187, 188, 259, 321 Straker 1-. Wilson, 6 Ch. App. 503 162 Strange V. Eooks, 4 Giff. 408 "... 369 Streatfield v. Streatfield, 1 Wh. & Tu. L. C. 416 96 Strettoni-. Ashmall, 3 Dr. 12 ; 3 W. R. 4; 24L. J. Ch. 277 214 Strickland v. Aldridge. 9 Ves. 219 ; 7 R. R. 292 53, 56 D. Symons, 26 Ch. D. 243 26,322 Stuart, Re, Smith v. Stuart, [1897] 2 Ch. 583 ; 66 L. J. Ch. 780 -, 77 L. T. 128 ; 46 W. R. 41 359, 360 f. Norton, 14 Moo. ^. C. 17 225 1-. Stuart, 3 Beav. 430 161 Stubbs I'. Sargon, 2 Keen, 255 ; 3 My. & Cr. 507 ; 7 L. J. (n.S.) Ch. 95;44R.R. 241 103,107 Styles ». Guy, 1 M. & G. 423 ; 19 L. J. Ch. 185 208, 237 Sudeley (Lord) and Baines & Co., i?(?, [1894] 1 Ch. 334 279 Sunter ii. Great Western Rail Co., 23 W. R. 126 159 Susanni, i?e, 47 L. J. Ch. 65 21 Sutton, i?e,12Ch.D. 175;27 W:R. 529;48L. J. Ch. 350 332 t\ Jones, 15 Ves. 587 249 r. Wilder, 12 Eq. 377 ; 19 W. R. 1021 ; 41 L. J. Ch. .30 ; 25L.T. 292 218 Swaffield v. Nelson, W. N. (1876), at p. 255 200, 212, 213 TABLE OF CASES. Iv PAGE Swain, i?^, Swain r. Bringeman, [1891] 3 Ch. 233 361 Swale V. Swale, 22 Beav. 584 235 Swan, i?^, 2 Hem. & M. 34 261,333 Swasey r. American Bible Society, 57 Meri. B27 64 Sweetapple 11. Bindon, 2 Ver. 536 98 Swinnock f. De Crispe, Free. 78 257,262 Sykes r. Sykes, 13 Eq. 56 ; 20 W. E. 90 ; 41 L. J. Ch. 25 ; 25 L. T. 560 44,49 Symes r. Hughes. 9 Eq. 475 ; 39 L. J. Ch. 304 ; 22 L. T. 462 : 109—111, 119 Synnot r. Simpson, 5 H. L. Cas. 241 25, 26 T , ^e, 15 Ch. D. 78 187 Tabor v. Brooks. 10 Ch. D. 273 ; 48 L. J. Ch. 130 ; 39 L. T. 528 : 167, 256, 258 Tailby «. Official Receiver, 13 App. Cas. 523 41 Tait i-. Lathbury, 1 Eq. 174 97 Talbot r. Jevers, 20 Eq. 255 276 . 1-. Marshfield, 3 Ch. App. 622 252 1. O'SuUiTan, 6 L. R. Ir. 302 23 i: Radnor (Earl), 3 My. & K. 252 ; 41 E. R. 64 ... 217, 334 (Earl) 1). Scott, 4 Kay & J. 139 356,357 TaUatire, JBe, W. N. (1885), p. 191 297,306 Tankard, Me, [1899J 2 Q. B. 57 ; 68 L. J. Q. B. 670 ; 47 W. R. 624 ; 80 L. T. 500 Sr, Tanqneray, Willanme, and Landau. He, 20 Ch. D. 479 ; 30 W. R. 801 ; 51 L. J. Ch. 434 ; 46 L. T. 542 140, 147 Tappenden r. Walsh, 1 Ph. 352 19 Tarleton r. Hornby, 1 Y. & C. Ex. .936 .374 Tasker c. Small, 3 My. & Cr. 69 ; 45 R. R. 211 ; 6 Sim. 625 ; 5 L. J. (N.S.) Ch. 321 28 Tatam !;. Williams, 3 Hare, 347 .372 Tate i: Williamson, 2 Ch. App. 55 ; 15 W. R. 321 ; 15 L. T. 549 : 68, 72, 251 Taylor, Re, Taylor v. Wade, [1894] 1 Ch. 671 ; 63 L. J. Ch. 424 ; 70 L. T. 556 ; 42 W. R. 373 .382.388 V. Blacklock, 55 L. J. Ch. 99 ; 34 W. R. 175 7 V. Chester, L. R. 4 Q. B. 309 109 I. Clark, 1 Hare, 161 176 V. Coenen, 1 Ch. D. 636 ; 34 L. T. 18 79 ;;. Haygarth, 14 Sim. 8 152 f. Meades, 13 W. R. 394 ; 34 L. J. Ch. 203 60,63 V. Plumer, 3 M. & S. 562 ; 2 Rose, 415 ; 16 R. R. 361 : 351—353 1-. Tabrnm, 6 Sim. 281 264 !). Taylor, 3 De G. M. & G. 190 121 Teasdale v. Braithwaite, 4 Ch. D. 90 ; 46 L. J. Ch. 725 ; 36 L. T. 601 ; 25 W. R. 546 92 Tebbs «. Carpenter, 1 Madd. 291 ; 16 R. R. 224 192 Tee «. Ferris, 2 Kay. & J. 3.57 58 Tempest, He, 1 Ch. App. 485 306 i: Camoys (Lord), 35 Beav. 201 ; 21 Ch. D. 571 ; 31 W.R. 326 ; 51 L. J. Ch. 785 ; 48 L. T. 13 19,258,2.59 Temple ^. Thring, 56 L. J. Ch. 767 198 Tennant v. Trenchard,-4 Ch. App. 547 ; 38 L. J. Ch. 169 ; 20 L. T. 856 244 Ivi TABLE OP CASES. PAGE Thatcher, He, 26 Ch. D. 426 2(i:J Thellussonr. Woodford, 11 Yes. 112; 8 R.E. 104 46- Thomas, i?<',WeatheraIl !'. Thomas, [1900] 1 Ch. 319 181 , Me, Wood V. Thomas, [1891] 3 Ch. 482 : 60 L. J. Ch. 781 ; 65L. T. 142 170, 17S r. Kelly, 13 App. Cas. 506 ^41 Thompson «. Clive, 11 Beav. 475 263- r. Eastwood, 2 App. Cas. 215 374 r. Finch, 8 De G. M. & G. 560 ; 22 Beav. 316 ; 25 L. J. Ch. 681 ; 27 L. T. 330 237,375,377 r. Fisher, 10 Eq. 207 9» r. Shakespeare, Johns. 612 ; 8 W. E. 265 ; 29 L. J. Ch. 276;2L. T. 479 62 -— r. Simpson, 1 Dr. & War. 491 392 !). Thomas, 27 L. E. Ir. 457 49 V. Webster, 4 Drew. 632 76 Thomson v. Clydesdale Bank, [1893] A. C. 282 ; 69 L. T. 156 : 133, 355, 393 Thornl-,orongh?>. Baker, 2 Wh.&Tu. 1 130 Thorndike r. Hunt, 3 D. & J. 56 ; 7 W. E. 246 ; 28 L. J. Ch. 417 ; 32L. T. 346 397 Thoine v. Heard, [1895] A. C. 495 ; 64 L. J. Ch. 652 ; 73 L. T. 291 ; 44 W. E. 155 365 Thorpe, Be. Vipont r. Badcliffe, [1891] 2 Ch. 360 i 60 L. J. Ch. 529 ; 64L. T. 654 246 — i. Owen, 5 Beav. 224 ; 2 W. E. 208 ; 23 L. J. Ch. 286 ... 35 Thursby v. Thursby, 19 Eq. 395 ; 23 W. E. 500 ; 44 L. J. Ch. 289 ; 32L. T. 187 167,172 Thurston v. Dickerson, 2 Eich. Eq. 317 184 Tibbits x. Tibbits. 19 Ves. 657 ; 23 E. E. 79 22 Tickner r. Old, 18 Eq. 422 ; 22 W. E. 871 ; 31 L. T. 29 ... 166, 169 Tidd, Re, Tidd v. Overell, [1893] 3 Ch. 154 131 Tierney r. Wood, 19 Beav. 330 ; 3 W. R. 577 ; 23 L. T. 266 ... 52 Tillott, Be, Lee r. Wilson, [1892] 1 Ch. 86 ; 61 L. J. Ch. 38 ; 65 L.T. 781 252,254 Titley r. Wolstenholme, 7 Beav. 425 289 Todd, Ex parie, 19 Q. B. D. 186 ; 56 L. J. Q. B. 431 ; 35 W. E. 676 85 t. Moorhonse, 19 Eq. 69 131,181 !;. Studholme, 3 Kay & J. 324 385 Toller u. Atwood, 15 Q. B. 929 ; 20 L. J. Q. B. 40 148 Tomhnson, Me, [1898] 1 Ch. 232 ; 67 L. J. Ch. 97 : 78 L. T. 12 : 46W.E.299 181,185 Tooke T. Hollingworth, 5 T. E. 277 ; 2 E. E. 573 352 Topham v. Spencer, 2 Jur. (U.S.) 865 128 Toutt, J?e, 26 Ch. D. 45 295,317 Townley v. Sherborne, Bridg. 35 ; 2 Wh. & Tu. 629 234' 236 Townsend, Me, [1895] 1 Ch. 716 ; 64 L. J. Ch. 334 ; 72 L. T. 321 : 43W.E. 392 142,148 Townson v. Harrison, 43 Ch. D. 55 ; 59 L. J. Ch. 1 69 : 38 W. E. 265 • 61 L.T. 762 .. 180 r. Tickell, 3 B. & A. 31 ; 22 E. R. 291 "" 135 v. Machonochie, 39 Ch. D. 116 ; 57 L. J. Ch. 936 : 59 L.T. 681;37W. E.83 50 Travis, Me, Frost %. Greatorex, [1900] 2 Ch. 541 ... ..'. li2 276 Tregonwell «. Sydenham, 3 Dow. 210 ; 15 E. E. 40 106,107' 112 Trevor v. Trevor, 1 P. & W. 622 ; 1 H. L. Cas. 239 96 99 Trowell v. Shenton, 8 Ch. D. 318 ... 89' 91 TABLE OF CASES. Ivii PAGB Trutcb r. Lampvell, 20 Bear. 116 237 Tucker, Re, Tucker i\ Tucker, [1894] 1 Cli. 124 ; 63 L. J. Ch. 737 ; 71L. T. 453 207 r. Bennett, 38 Ch. D. 1 72 <. Burron, 2 Hem. & if. 515 ; 11 .Tur. (N.S.) 525 ... 114, 119 ( . Horneman, 4 De G. M. & G. 395 335 Tullett r. Armstrong, 4 My. & Cr. 377 277,281 Tunbridger. Cane, 19 AV.'r. 1047 114 Tupper r. EuUer, 7 Rich. Eq. 107 182 Turcan, i?c, 40 Ch. D. 5 20 Turner, Re. Barker i\ Ivimey, [1897] 1 Ch. 536 ; 66 L. J. Ch. 282 ; 76 L. T. 116 ; 45 W. R. 455 ... 200, 216, 359, 360, 361, 377 V. Collins, 7 Ch. App. 329 ; 20 W. E. 305 ; 41 L. J. Ch. 558; 25L. T. 779 73 1'. Maule, 15 Jur. 761 297 Turnley, Re. 1 Ch. App. 152 187 Turton c. Benson, 1 P. Wms. 496 391,399 Tweddle r. Atkinson, 1 B. & S. 393 ; 30 L. J. Q. B. 265 29,30 Tweedale i: Tweedale, 7 Ch. D. 633 ; 26 W. R. 4.-i7 ; 47 L. J. Ch. 530 ; 38 L. T. 151 15,22 Tweedie and Jliles, Re, 27 Ch. D. 315 278 Twynne's Case, 1 Sm. L. C. 1 78 Tyars r. Alsop, 61 L. T. 8 ; 37 \V. R. 339 66, 71 Tyler, i?c. Tyler r. Tyler, [1891] 3 Ch.2.-i2 64 !. Tyler, SBeaT. 563 373 Tyrwhitt r. Tyrwhitt, 32 Beav. 244 131 U. UndervTOod !'. Sterens, 1 Meri. 717 369 Ungless r. Tuff. 9 W. E. 727 211 Uniacke, Re, 1 Jo. & Lat. 1 138 Upfnll,i?f, 3il. & G. 281 332 Upton r. Brown, 12 Ch. D. 872 ; 26 Ch. D. 588 105, 182 V. Vachell r. Roberts, 32 Beav. 140 168 Van Grutten r. Poxwell, [1897] A. C. 6.-iS ; 66 L. J. Q. B. 745 ; 77L. T. 170; 46 W. R. 426 142,149 Vansittart, Re. Ex paHeBroT^n, [1893] 2 Q. B. 377 ; 62 L. J. Q. B. 279 ; 68 L. T. 233 ; 41 W. R. 286 86 !. Vansittart, 2 D. & J. 249 50 Varney r. Stevens, 22 Mex. 331 182 Vauffhan, i'i' warff, 14 Q. B. D. 25 327 I , Re, Vaughan r. Thomas, 33 Ch. D. 187 62, 64 Vaughton !. Noble, 30 Beav. 34 382 Venables r. Foyle, 1 Ch. Cas. 3 130 r. Morris, 7 T. R. 342 ; 4 R. K. 455 143 Vemey, Re, ri898] 1 Ch. 508 ; 67 L. J. Ch. 243 ; 78 L. T. 191 ; 46W. R^348 186 Vernon, iJf', 35 W. R. 225 ; 55 L. T. 416 7 Vicary r. Evans, 30 Beav. 376 217 Vicat, JBc, 33 Ch. D. 103 305,315 Villiers !•. ViUlers, 2 Atk. 72 li" Iviii TABLE OF CASES. PAGE Vincent w. Vincent, 35 W. R. 7 37,54 ^?e'';.^rtg'Pcl'.^ip%l, aff.L.K.7 H.L;318; 23W e; 355 ; 4. L. J. Ch. 37 ; 31 L. T. 177 s.^.'stS S^o' w. Waite V. Littlewood, 41 L. J. Ch. 636 ; 42 L. J. Ch. 216 ; 21 W. R. 131 ; 28 L. T. 123 ; L. E. 8 Ch. 70 211 Walcott «. Lyons, 54 L. T. 786 • .„ AV^ oJo Waldo V. Waldo, 7 Sim. 261 ; 40 R. R. 134 2o6, 260, 263 Walker,^!;, Summers v. Barrow, [1901] 1 Ch. 259 aOU , Re, Walker v. Walker, 62 L. T. 449 ; 59 L. J. Ch. 386 ... 164 211,212,215,216,347 and Hughes, Re, 24 Ch. D. 698 298 V. Smallwood, Amb. 676 273 !). Symonds, 3 Sw. 63 ; 19 R. R. 155 235—237, .369 r. Wetherell, 6 Ves. 255 262 Walters v. Woodbridge, 7 Ch. D. 504 ; 26 W. R. 469 ; 47 L. J. Ch. 516;38L. T. 83 321 Walton (P. Walton, 14 Ves. 322 103,104 Walwyn ». Coutts, 3 Sim. 14 ; 30 R. R. 117 25 Want V. Campain, 9 T. L. R. 254 212 V. Stallihraas, L. R. 8 Ex. 175 ; 29 L. T. 293 ; 21 W. R. 685 ; 42L.J. Ex. 108 159 Warburton -!). Sandys, 14 Sim. 622 284 Ward, iJe,47L. J. Ch. 781 219 !). Butler, 2 Moll. 533 137 V. Ward, 2 H. L. Cas. 784 190, 256, 259 Ware v. Cann, 10 B. & C. 433 ; 8 L. J. K. B. 164 ; 34 R. R. 469 ... 49 V. Gardner, 7 Eg. 317 ; 17 W. R. 439 ; 38 L. J. Ch. 348 ; 20L. T. 71 79 Waring -p. Waring, 3 Ir. Ch. Rep. 331 , 196,214 Warriner v. Rogers, 16 Eq. 340 ; 21 W. R. 766 ; 42 L. J. Ch. 581 ; 28L. T. 863 36 Warwick ?J. Warwick, 3 Atk. 291 392 Wassell v. Leggatt, [1896] 1 Ch. 554 ; 65 L. J. Ch. 240 ; 74 L. T. 99;44W. R. 298 365 Water t). Anderson, 11 Hare, 301 325 Waters, iie, W. N. (1889), 39 164 Watson, Re, 19 Ch. D. 384 317 u Hayes, 5 My. & Cr. 125 103,105 v. Pearson, 2 Exch. 581 ; 18 L. J. Ex. 46 ... 142, 143, 146, 147 !;; Woodman, 20 Eq. 721 132 D. Young, 28 Ch. D. 436 44,46 Watts, Re, 9 Hare, 106 297 Waugh, Re, 25 W. R. 555 182 Weall, Re, Andrews v. Weall, 

42 Ch. D. 674 ; 57 L. J. Ch. 713 ; 61 L. T. 238 ; 37 W. R. 779 221, 222. 228, 331 Weaver, iJe, 21 Ch. D. 615; 31 W.R. 224; 48L. T. 93 ... ... 258 Webb, i?e, 63 L. T. 545 322 , Re. Lambert v. Still, [1894] 1 Ch. 73 ; 63 L. J. Ch. 145 ; 70L. T. 318 242 ». Jonas, 39 Ch. D. 660 200,213 v. Lugar, 2 Y. & C. 247 ; 47 R. R. 407 ; 6 L. J. (n.s.) Ex. 49 127 TABLE OF CASES. lix PAGE Webb i: Shaftesbury (Earl), 7 Ves. 488 : 6 E. R. 154 ... 240, 243, 246, 358 Wedderburn, Be,

9 Ch. D. 112 ; 27 W. R. 58 ; 47 L. J. Ch. 743 ; 39L. T.904 158,209 r. Wedderburn, 22 Beav. 84 243 Weeding, iJe, 4 Jur. (N.s.) 707 305 Weekes, ^«, [1897]

1 Ch. 289 15,22 Weir V. Bell, 3 Ex. D. 238 197 Wellborne, Re, [1901] 1 Ch. 312 242, 323 Wellesley I'. Wellesley, 4 My. & Or. 561 20 Wells V. Malbou, 31 Beav. 48 ; 31 L. J. Ch. 344 ; 8 Jur. (N.s.) 249 : 335, 337 Wenlock (Lady) c. River Dee Commrs., 19 Q. B. D. 155 322 Wesley !. Clark, 1 Eden, 357 237 West London Bank v. Reliance, etc. Society, 29 Ch. D. 954 398 West, Be, George v. Grose, [1900] 1 Ch. 84 103 V. Williams, [1898] 1 Ch. 488 ; 67 L. J. Ch. 213 ; 78 L. T. 147 ; 46W. R. 362 48 West of England Bank r. Murch, 23 Ch. D. 138 ; 31 W. R. 467 ; 52 L. J. Ch. 650 ; 48 L. T. 417 295 Westmeath v. Westmeath, 1 Dow. (N.s.) 519 ; 35 E. E. 54 50 Weston, Be, Davies v. Tagart, [1900] 2 Ch. 164 382, 388 Wetheredr. Wethered, 2Sim. 183; 29R. R. 77 41 Wharton r. Masterman, [1895] A. C. 186 ; 64 L. J. Ch. 369 ; 72 L. T. 431 ; 43 W. E. 449 276 Wheeler and de Eochow, Be, [1896] 1 Ch. 315 ; 65 L. J. Ch. 219 ; 73 L. T. 661 ; 44 W. E. 270 298 r. Smith, 1 Gif. 300 113 /•. Warner, 1 S. & S. 304 ; 24 E. E. 176 15 Whichcote r. Lawrence, 3 Ves. 740 244 Whinney, ^^i^arte, [1900]2 Q. B. D. 186 ... 85 Whiston, Be, Lovett v. Williamson, [1894] 1 Ch. 661 ; 63 L. J. Ch. 273 ; 70 L. T. 681 ; 42 W. E. 327 94 Whitbread r. Smith, 2 De G. M. & G. 741 178,180 White, Be, White v. Edmond, ri901] 1 Ch. 570 279 and Hindle, Be, 7 Ch. D. 201 ... 144 r. Bangh, 3 CI. & E. 44 224 t. Briggs, 2 Ph. 583 ; 15 Sim. 33 19 V. Parker, 1 Bing. N. C. 573 ; 4 L. J. C. P. 178 140 r. White, 9 Ves. 556 ; 4 E. E. 161 179 Whitefield v. Brand, 16 M. & W. 282 149 Whitehead, Be, Peacock v. Lucas, [1894] 1 Ch. 678 ; 63 L. J. Ch. 229 ; 70 L. T. 122 ; 42 W. E. 491 166 Whiteley, Be, Whiteley r. Learoyd, 12 App. Cas. 727 ; 33 Ch. D. 347 188,189,200,210,214,216,226,347 Whitney i: Smith, 4 Ch. App. 521 ; 17 W. R. 579 ; 20 L. T. 468 : •' 212,246,365,378 Whitwam ». Watkin, 78 L. T. 188 362 Whitton, iJe, 8 Eq. 353 187 Widdow, Be, 11 Eq. 408 279 Wightman v. Townroe, 1 M. & S. 412 ; 14 R. R. 475 151 Wilcock, i?fi, 62 L. T. 317 ;A „. - "^"^ Wild V. Banning, 2 Eq. 577 ; 35 L. J. Ch. 594 ; 14 L. T. 845 ; 12 Jur. (N.S.) 464 106 Wilday D. Sandys, 7 Eq. 4.55 ; 17 W. R. 603 166,168 Wiles r. Gresham, 2 Drew. 258 ; 5 De G. M. & G. 770 ; 3 W. R. 87 ; 24L.J. Ch.264 192,268,349,3.50 Wilkes i\ Groom, 6 De G. M. & G. 205 312 Ix 

TABLE OP CASES. PAGE WilkinH V. Hogg, 3 Gif. 116 ; 10 W. K. 47 ; 8 Jur. (N.S.) 25 ; 31L. J. Ch.41 367 Wilkinson 1-. Parry, 4 Rnss. 276 ; 28 E. K. 24 291,369 Williams' Settlement, i?e. 4 Kay & J. 87 333 Williams' Trusts, Ee, 36 Ch. U. 231 ; 56 L. T. 884 303, 312 , Re. Williams t: Williams, [1897] 2 Ch. 12 ; 66 L. J. Ch. 485 ; 76 L. T. 600 ; 45 W. E. 519 18,23 -c. Corbett, 8 Sim. 349 ; 6 L. J. (N.S.) Ch. 182 ; 42 E. E. 200 26 ». Scott, [1900] A. C. 499 248,250 ?i. Teale, 6 Hare, 239 100 f. Waters, 14 M. & W. 166 141 f. Williams, 32 Beav. 370 114,116 r. , 17Ch. D. 437 219,382 Willis ^. Kibble, 1 Beav. 559 '. 240 ——r. Willis, 2 Atk. 71 104 Wilson, Ee, Alexander v. Calder, 28 Ch. D. 457 ; 33 W. E. 579 ; 54 L. J. Ch. 487 335 I. Bury, 5Q.B. D. 18 34,39 v. Hoare, 2 B. & Ad. 350 151 D. Moore, 1 My. & K. 126 ; 36 K. E. 272 348 V. Wilson, 1 H. L. Cas. 538 50 Winchilsea (Earl of), ^«, 39 Ch. D. 168 320 Winslow, Ee, Prere r. Winslow, 45 Ch. D. 249 ; 60 L. J. Ch. 20 ; 63 L. T. 485 ; 39 W. E. 120 163,388 «. Tighe, 2 Ball & B. 195 ; 12 E. R. 75 127 Wise, Ee, Ex parte, Mercer, 17 Q. B. D. 290 ; 54 L. T. 720 ...76, 80 , Jackson «. Parrott, [1896] 1 Ch. 281 ; 65 L. J. Ch. 281 ; 73L. T. 703; 44 W. E. 310 45 r. Piper, 13 Ch. D. 848 97,278 r. Wise, 2 Jo. & Lat. 403 138 Withers 1). Withers, Amb. 152 ... ... ... ... ... ... 52 Withington v. Withington, 16 Sim. 104 297 WoUaston v. Tribe, 9 Eq. 44 ; 18 W. E. 83 ; 21 L. T. 449 67, 68 Wood V. Cook, 40 Ch. D. 461 ; 37 W. E. 502 ; 58 L. J. Ch. 518 ... 70 1). Cox, 2 My. & Or. 684 ; 6 L. J. (N.S.) Ch. 366; 45 E. E. 156 ... 103,106 r. Middleton, 76 L. T. 155 208 r. Patteson, 10 Beav. 544 257,260 «. Weightman, 13 Eq. 434 ; 20 W. E. 459 ; 26 L. T. 385 ... 220 Woodbum, J?e, 1 De G. & J. 333 333,334 Woodgate, Re, 5 W. E. 448 .304 Woodhouse ». Walker, 5 Q. B. D. 404 183 v. Woodhouse, 8 Eq. 514 ; 38 L. J. Ch. 481 ; 20 L. T. 209 ; 17 W. E. 583 193 Woodin, Re, Woodin v. Glass. [1895]

2 Ch. .309 271 Woods -i!. Woods, 1 My. & Cr. 401 ; 43 R. R. 214 23 Woodyatt r. Gresley, 8 Sim. 180 ; 42 R. R. 153 ... 382, 383, 389 Worman r. Worman, 43 Ch. D. 296 ; 38 W. R. 442 212 Worral v. Harford, 8 Ves. 4 26, 320 Worthington II. M'Crear, 23 Bear. 81 262 Wray D. Steele, 2 V. & B. 388 113 Wren «. Kirton, 11 Ves. 380 232 Wright, ^a;^7arte, 19 Ves. 258 130 , iJc, 3 K. & J. 421 328 D. Pearson, 1 Eden, 125 94,96 V. Vanderplank, 8 De G. M. & G. 133 ; 2 Kay & J. 1 ...71, 73 f. Wright, 2 J. & H. 655 277 TABLE OP CASES. Ixi Wroe c. Seed, 4 Giff. 425, 429 Wyatt 'V. ShaiTatt, 3 Beav. 498 Wykham ;-. Wykham, 18 Ves. 395 Wylly, Re, 28 Beav. 458 ; 8 W. B. 645 Wyman r. Patei-aou, [1900] A. C. 270 ... Wynne r. Humberston, 27 Beav. 421 ... /. Tempest, [1897] 1 Ch. 113 ; 13 T. L. R. 360 Wythes, Re, [1893] 

2 Ch. 375 PAGE ... 2.53 196, 200 ... 143 ... .333 ... 233 ... 151 .360,367,375 ... 283 Yew !. Edwards, 1 D. & J. 598 ... York, etc. Co. r. Hudson, 16 Beav. Yoade ?'. Cloud, 18 Eq. 634 Young i: Peachy, 2 Atk. 257 ... Younghusband r. Gisborne, 1 Coll. 485 400 ... 126 ... 127 ... 155 ... 114 48,281

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

2024 New Jersey Revised Statutes Title 39 - Motor Vehicles and Traffic Regulation Se"Intersection" means the area embraced within the prolongation of the lateral curb lines or, if none, the lateral boundary lines of two or more highways which join one another at an angle, whether or not one such highway crosses another.ction 39:1-1 - Words and phrases defined.'

2024 New Jersey Revised Statutes Title 39 - Motor Vehicles and Traffic Regulation Section 39:1-1 - Words and phrases defined.' 39:1-1 Words and phrases defined. 39:1-1. As used in this subtitle, unless other meaning is clearly apparent from the language or context, or unless inconsistent with the manifest intention of the Legislature: "Alley" means a public highway wherein the roadway does not exceed 12 feet in width. "Authorized emergency vehicles" means vehicles of the fire department, police vehicles and such ambulances and other vehicles as are approved by the chief administrator when operated in response to an emergency call. "Autocycle" means a three-wheeled motorcycle designed to be controlled with a steering wheel and pedals in which the operator and passenger may ride in a completely or partially enclosed seating area that is equipped with a roll cage or roll hoops, safety seat belts for each occupant, and anti-lock brakes. "Automobile...

Educational Purpose

Educational Purpose 

NJ Transit bus strikes, kills pedestrian. Another person seriously injured Koran Tajhai Dupree Baker, a 25-year-old Newark

  Another Life Lost to NJ Transit: When Will It End? Early Sunday morning, tragedy struck in Newark when an NJ Transit bus hit two pedestrians, leaving one dead and another seriously injured. According to the Essex County Prosecutor’s Office, the incident occurred at 12:18 a.m. on the 400 block of Springfield Avenue. Koran Tajhai Dupree Baker, a 25-year-old Newark resident, succumbed to his injuries at a local hospital. The second victim remains hospitalized, fighting to recover. Here we are in 2025, and NJ Transit buses continue to take lives under Governor Phil Murphy’s administration. How many more people must be injured or killed before real accountability is enforced? It’s time for action. A class action lawsuit needs to be filed against NJ Transit on behalf of all living victims and the families of those who have lost their lives due to reckless bus drivers. These drivers must be held accountable—this is not just negligence; these are murders on wheels . NJ Transit has ...