I received a “strange” copy of a contract the other party (plaintiffs) claim they sent me.
That contract doesn’t even have either parties names on it, obviously no signatures etc.
How or where do I find the essential elements of getting this to be inadmissible? (I don’t even know if the wording of this question is the right wording, what I see it something any normal person wouldn’t allow in, but I also learned from Jurisdictionary that, that’s exactly NOT how court system works… at least Im there but now I need to write it correctly)
It's the rules of evidence. It's not automaticly admitted. That's what happens at trial but you should be prepared with the evidence rules
Have you taken the evidence class inside the course ?
During Discovery,
ask them to Authenticate it, identify who created/sent it, produce the "original," explain the missing names/signatures, and provide any chain of custody.*See the Motion & Hearing section of the course,as well as Evidence
Use their answers to support your Motion.
Without it, the Declaration is Conclusory.
The Evidence section of the Jurisdictionary Course explains this, in detail.
It takes out all the guess work.
*Also see the Affidavits section
*Objections
lawbook@jurisdictionary.com
Peace IS possible!
I remember a phone call like this a couple of years ago (to a different bank) and asked for a written confirmation but first she pretended that i asked if it was confirmed etc etc after me persisting she said yeah it will be sent in the mail, which you could tell in her voice she wants to get me off the phone and i knew nothing would come, which it didn’t.
Do we then, ask permission to record it, record and transcribe, send transcript to the bank in a way we’re not asking but turning it around like them saying something like if you’re not agreeing contact us within 30 days
not doing so makes this undisputed document verified and immediately “admittable” in court
Can we do that????
(Should we do that?)
Or should I try harder to find this law this bank uses naming phone calls as an exclusive opt out.
End, I told them all that I am one of the people, and that officers of the court were all stealing my property without real parties and interest on vacate judgments and we’re trespassing on the estate without authority for unjust enrichment and intentionally harming me. Within three days, all of the attorneys withdrew as council in my foreclosure and my eviction, and the eviction attorney filed a motion to grant me a dismissal with prejudice, and I have an order sitting on the Judge desk to get possession back and I’m gonna get an order on the foreclosure judges tomorrow to vacate the foreclosure, incorrect all their records and put my house in the private. There’s zero remedy in those courts zero. I don’t recommend doing that but it’s been going on for three years and they all dug a hole so deep in fraud and I was sick and tired of being diplomatic about it and trying to get remedy where remedy cannot be gotten.
Courts are no longer necessary,or appropriate?
Is that your stance?
Comments
Post a Comment