Educational Purpose

 I'd like to take a second and reflect on how powerful Doc's strategy is on the verified complaint.  This is such an underrated tool and it is (in my opinion) the true secret sauce of the Jurisdictionary method.  It's a devastating asymmetric neutron bomb.  Right out of the gate you dictated that this adversarial war of words is being fought on a chessboard - while the opposing party is playing checkers, which is a structured mismatch from the start.  No one wants to file a verified answer to a complaint if they are wrong.  It sets up the perfect perjury trap.

In my case against Liberty Mutual - I was very careful to plead only facts that I could swear to under penalty of perjury.  Those numbskulls had the first of the 4 defendants respond with an unverified answer.  Next, they played procedural games to weaponize the Guardian ad Litem for the defendant and used it as a jurisdictional defect for Motion to Dismiss my complaint against this defendant.  I found NC APP and SC cases that say procedural games are not a way to win in NC - substance over procedure is the way here.  Counsel added an affirmative defense in their filing as well.  The whole document is the Answer/12(b) motions/Affirmative defense all in one.

This is where it gets interesting.  In their affirmative defense, they allege a crime against me - reckless endangerment (or reckless driving - i can't remember off the top of my head right now).  HOWEVER - the police report estimated my speed at 30 mph in a 40mph zone.  The damage is not consistent with reckless and the only witness other than me was the 16 year girl that hit me.  They then used the Reckless criminal misdemeanor to then allege that because I am asking for mental anguish damages for my son - and because I contributed to that damage through my recklessness - they want attorneys fees back for this lawsuit - which scared the bejesus out of my wife - kept her up all night worrying about it.

Defense just fell into the verified complaint TRAP by being idiots.  They are so screwed.  They perjured themselves.  So, first I am filing Rule 11 Sanctions against them for this whole answer (which will be supported by NC App and NC SC case law) with a motion to strike the complete answer/affirmative defense/motion for lack of verification.  HOWEVER - I am also going to move the court to take judicial notice of the affirmative defense paragraphs and the answers to the complaint.  If the the girl by and through her father continues to allege the misdemeanor against me - she is trapped.  My next move will be to find cases that support a new COA against her and her father for perjury or fraud.  IF the affirmative defense changes and they drop the reckless driving misdemeanor allegation - they have now impeached themselves.  That lawyer is going to have his own problems with the judge and my flurry of motions to move the court against him.  I plan on verifying my Sanctions motion by a notary - so it will look even worse for them when they file an unverified opposition.

All this to say - the verified complaint completely trapped them.  they took the bait.  They lied in their answer, now their lie has to get bigger or more convoluted and it will become harder and harder to manage.  It's like when your car hits some ice and you try to correct, but then the car goes too far to the left so you overcorrect to the right, and keep repeating...until you spin out.  That is the genius behind the verified complaint.  I will never sue anyone without a verified complaint.  It is incredibly lethal to the other side when the facts and TRUTH are on your side.

This is my opposition to sever.

Jurisdictionary style + IRAC.  Found the controlling case law and applied it every step of the way.  I gave the judge a place to hang his hat and made it nearly impossible to rule against me.  Defendants counsel made up quotes and parenthesis and applied those fabrications to case law that had nothing to do with the quotes.  It was really bad.

This simple recipe perfectly explains our duties in court and how those duties must be ordered and presented. Something so simple yet rarely taught. Thank you for this, I find this to be very helpful and profound.

I've got a very unique tort claim and I feel like I will miss something during the filing of it. It exceeds the preponderance threshold with clear and convincing evidence. It's a Rico/Monell Doctrine Claim. Maine DHHS, Arizona CPS and the banking institution binding them as the enterprise. Of the multiple violations ADA violations, assisted kidnapping across multiple states (felony) parental rights interference just to name a few. I can't let my children down. Especially my special needs son. Timing is of the essence as abuse in state facility has been proven.

1983 manal Doctrine claim combined with a Rico conspiracy racketeering assisted kidnapping by state agents just the name a couple of them against department of health and human services state of Maine Americans Disabilities Act child protective services Arizona Americans with Disabilities Act parental jurisdiction last parental interference on both parts wire fraud fraud and Bangor savings Bank binding them both together as an enterprise

I see this relates to your children and think people here are willing to help.

I might have missed it but, What’s your question?
Did you file your 1983 Complaint yet? Based on you saying that you need to get this correct the first time, it sounds like you might not have filed yet.

I’m (slowly!) writing my 1983 complaint and studying Jurisdictionary and the Federal Rules for that.

Just remember, if time is of the essence something to keep in mind, if you file a complaint on time that’s somewhat “imperfect” you’re able to amend/change it (including once without needing approval but check the rules)
that’s better than filing the “perfect” complaint a day too late.

One of the things I learned from someone with a lawyer suing me, and me getting each case dismissed, there’s many attorneys just file something not even close to perfect and they’re getting away with it because Jurisdictionary isn’t a class in elementary school (or middle of high school).

I hope you can be more clear of what you’re looking for in help.

I'm filing Thursday.u son was taken from me,along with his brother and sister. After 2 years of financial abuse by my employer. And the Fiduciary of his trust. This after 24 bad faith reports in an attempt to show me as unfit. It failed in probate. 10 days later I thought I was going into an IEP meeting for my son. But was a closed zoom meeting. Judge, Fiduciary (vp trust department) and attorney for the bank. I haven't seen them since. And him not his brother or sister. 4 years. The first two years I was lead to believe I had no parental rights. Until I got a call from DHHS In investigator
My son.. special needs was being abused for some time at a state funded facility. The investigator also never lost my parental rights. The bank did this I later discovered. Because my ex wife informed them I was moving his trust because I felt the bank was not acting in my son's best interest. 2 years I was led to believe I had no rights and no contact with my son or other two children. That was the last I heard from DHHS. April of 24. Aug I was on the phone with his brother and he told me that Zain's mother came to Maine took him directly to CPS in Arizona. Where she lied to them about my investment in his life and she didn't want him. Throughout that summer. DHHS never again got in contact with me or answered my calls or emails . Through a life long friend who worked for DHHS for 25+years. informed me the upper management knew about the 24 bad faith reports. and did nothing about it. That they also were keeping her out from certain meetings because of her connection with me. Then the notice
Audit by DOJ v Maine
Massive ADA violations. Wrongful removal, no support or problems for families of special needs children.  The abuse and sudden closing of one of Maine flagship special needs facilities ( not one article or report) only that of the DOJ audit
Not a very good light in that announcement. Couple that with abuse of a minor and how he never would have been in that situation had they done their jobs. Bank funded trip for ex to get him out of the state. Still maintaining control of his trust. 2 years dhhs assisted in the rouse of my loss of parental rights. Challenger section that was violated judges didn't listen to me Arizona ignored everything even though they had all the proper evidence the ombudsman in Maine also new and supported the fact that I had 100% parental rights and tax and Arizona is going everything that's supposed to do as far as parental rights and jurisdiction This is just a some kind of some things up and that's been I've been fighting that for over 2 years come to find out Zane was being abused at his facility in Arizona they were violating his care He's gotten out one night at 4:30 in the morning I just received this from his guardian ad litem and Arizona had the same investigation in 2024 the entire state's involved in Maine because of the severity of the situation and what they did with me and my son as far as covering up the abuse and allowing him to be state aided kidnapping by his mother I had all the evidence I have timeline The fact that they all colluded because Arizona and Maine both aware of the fraudulent reports bad face reports and fraudulent statements and nothing was done about it because they needed the same things to happen for saying to get into foster care somewhere to cover up their investigations we'll cover up the fact that they were doing the same things that they were being investigated on by the department of Justice who just finished up their investigation that same year I just don't want to mess the paperwork up and I was like somebody could perhaps could be some kind of direction as to how long how detailed you know I don't want to overwhelm the judge but it's pretty pretty plain evil with it done

I hope Dr. Graves himself will comment on this.

I know he teaches us to bring court reporters to everything, and to object and call out the judges immediately and if overruled you redo it, and you file it on paper immediately afterwards.
I have never done this but I would document this and possibly file complaints against the judges (who are attorneys and took oaths)

Sorry I cannot be more helpful but never stop standing up for you son!