Skip to main content

 Maybe I’m too overwhelmed to see it right in front of me, but if I’m the defendant and


1) the papers weren’t properly served (improper service) and

2) I don’t see clearly what their definite statement (more definite statement)

I want to practice the Flurry of Motions from the course, and I benefit from adding more time.
Do do the Furry of Motion at once?

https://t.me/Jurisdictionary/28542

First study your states rules and procedures.
Choose the one most likely to get traction for you.
File it then SET IT FOR HEARING!


elise:
Sorry, what do you mean the one most likely to get traction for me?

If i want most time, my logic would say, first Improper Service and then More Definite Statement afterwards
but I’m also trying work myself through the rules and if it’s even possible/allowed to file 2 pre-Answer motions.

Is it just tactics on my side to waste their time/money on Improper Service (they will serve again I know that and that’s the point it’s better if they’re in this longer)

Jurisdictionary:
You're getting the idea.
Winning is ALL tactics!

Is or cán the Pre-Answer Motion for a more Definite Statement be just on paper? Or do you always first need to go before the judge to move the court to get the plaintiff to answer? (I prefer paper only, is that possible?)
I’m not sure where the communication is breaking down. But @b_freely  did not win his cases based on commercial / non-commercial arguments. He won based on statutory requirements for initiating a civil / criminal action against a person and that those statutory requirements are not being met by the state. Correct me if I’m wrong but this is what I gathered from his traffic ticket channel.

Lavode  on the other hand is showing that using the commercial / non-commercial argument is not holding up in court for driver’s license.

Yes fully agree Nelda, if Dr. Graves could weigh in that would be great!

(I did already see 1 that I will add to my own list, Failure to Mitigate)
Affirmative Defenses:

Must be recognized by the courts.

Your alleging Facts,with your Affirmative Defenses.
You only have to prove the Essential Fact Elements,of those you allege.

I think most people get caught up trying to disprove someone's Complaint.
That's a losing battle.......

Set Hearings ONLY on Motions you want ruled upon ... yours or your opponents'.
Thanks Brandon
I want Productions before the Hearing for the Motion of Improper Service, do I not schedule the hearing of the motion (yet) or do I schedule  the hearing further away?

The longer this takes until they serve me properly again, the better for me. That’s my tactic.
Make sure there is not 1 inch of land in this country that can be called a Constitution-free Zone

Florida Oversight

Transcript can be found in the Congressional Record
congress.gov


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New Jersey Rules Of Court

3:2-Contents of Complaints, Arrest Warrant and Summons 3:2-1-Contents of Complaint; Citizen Complaints for Indictable Offenses; Forwarding of Indictable Complaints to Prosecutor and Criminal Division Manager; Forwarding of Investigative Reports to Prosecutor You can read more of the Municipal Courts procedure that the Administrative Judge Law/Municipal Judge Law who is an Administrative Judge. 3:2-2-Summons A summons shall be made on a Complaint-Summons (CDR-1) form, a Uniform Traffic Ticket, a Special Form of Complaint and Summons, or such other form as may be approved by the Administrative Director of the Courts. The summons shall be directed to the person named in the complaint, requiring that person to appear before the court in which the complaint is made at a stated time and place, and shall indicate that there will be consequences for failure to appear at the scheduled first appearance. If the individual fails to appear at that first appearance, a notice shall issue advising the...

NJ Transit bus strikes, kills pedestrian. Another person seriously injured Koran Tajhai Dupree Baker, a 25-year-old Newark

  Another Life Lost to NJ Transit: When Will It End? Early Sunday morning, tragedy struck in Newark when an NJ Transit bus hit two pedestrians, leaving one dead and another seriously injured. According to the Essex County Prosecutor’s Office, the incident occurred at 12:18 a.m. on the 400 block of Springfield Avenue. Koran Tajhai Dupree Baker, a 25-year-old Newark resident, succumbed to his injuries at a local hospital. The second victim remains hospitalized, fighting to recover. Here we are in 2025, and NJ Transit buses continue to take lives under Governor Phil Murphy’s administration. How many more people must be injured or killed before real accountability is enforced? It’s time for action. A class action lawsuit needs to be filed against NJ Transit on behalf of all living victims and the families of those who have lost their lives due to reckless bus drivers. These drivers must be held accountable—this is not just negligence; these are murders on wheels . NJ Transit has ...
 "The federal statutes that force my opponent to comply with discovery are Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, 34, and 37. Rule 34 requires production within 30 days of a request. Rule 37 allows me to file a Motion to Compel if they fail to produce, and authorizes the Court to impose sanctions, award fees, strike their pleadings, or enter default judgment for willful non-compliance. Rule 37(e) also addresses spoliation of electronically stored information including body-worn camera footage and CAD records. In the District of New Jersey, Local Civil Rule 37.1 required me to complete a meet and confer before filing — which I completed on April 30, 2026." If you are trying to compel discovery and don't know what local rules and statutes govern compliance, you are wasting your time, and showing that you might not know what you are doing and aren't credible. This is akin to the tail wagging the dog or putting the cart before the horse. Sending a notice to opposing counsel achieves nothing...