Educational Purpose

 Do your administrative best THEN TAKE YOUR CASE TO COURT.

Once you read my class on Circumstantial Evidence in the REFERENCE menu, Joseph, you will KNOW what you need to know.
Guessing is not a good way win court cases, my friend.
Study what's I've worked hard these past 28 years to reveal to you, the secrets other Bar attorneys hide from the public.

I will read it once again and do everything in my power to memorize things. Like you have taught me, probabilities aren’t proof. Truth and justice will always require knowledge and facts. Sacred cows must be slaughtered for the sake of truth.

Last March 21, 2025 I filed a verified quiet title action. One of the parties actively dodged service, so I was able to serve via substitute service. ABC Legal didn't serve timely or properly and caused the case to stall essentially. A case management conference hearing is scheduled this Friday. One of the defendants did not answer the complaint and 3 times I filed a notice of default.. all were rejected. Today I found out why. I presume I will now have to dismiss the complaint with prejudice and start over. My fault for not being 💯% clear on a local rule and CCP § 415.20. I'm wondering if the defendants can sanction me somehow. What thinks Ye? Anyone please have any comments? Thanks. I'll post more below from the court.

So a local rule finished us off. The nature of the complaint is declaratory. I wonder if the rule applies to Quiet Title actions due to the limited need for discovery. Dr. Graves, or JJ would you mind weighing in here?

Declaratory judgments are an unusual animal.
They can be powerful in some circumstances, e.g., when title to property is an ISSUE in another case.
Is that what you're leaning toward.

If the proceeding is being recorded, as soon as it is stated it is recorded. You can’t unhear what was said. Hearings and trials are not time efficient. They are meant to be precise and detailed to get proper evidence on the record. I took 2 hours in my circuit court hearing to get everything on the record. They hated it. But in the end it was that transcript that I could then refer to in all my later appeals and filings.

So for anyone who's trying to understand the process or lack thereof in which parking tickets and traffic tickets are handled, here's the breakdown:

In 1915 there was a Supreme Court case, Hendrick V Maryland, where it was ruled that driving a motor vehicle is a privilege and NOT a right.

This allows every state to make up their own rules on how they handle motor vehicles, which includes traffic and parking tickets, which means they can violate the right to due process because of the privilege thing.

It gives the states way too broad power and it's also based on circumstances in 1915 when cars were not as common and way more dangerous.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think we need to get that 1915 Supreme Court case overturned

Was this case involving private actors? I have come across language where there seems to be a differentiation between state and private actors.

At some point in most states and in most courts you will end up inside the courtroom for a hearing. Motions to dismiss must be heard before being disposed.

How can u subpoena on am administrative court that is government run and gives no subpoena form.  Create ur own?

Study the rule on Declaratory Judgments in your jurisdiction.
There are guardrails and limits on what it can and cannot do.

No.
The next step is to study my class on Causes of Action so they cannot dismiss for "failure to state a claim" or "failure to state a cause of action".
You'd not be in federal court if you trusted my course.

Have you read my "License to Steal" book?
FREE at https://jurisdictionary.com/courses/license-to-steal/
America and the concept of a government designed to protect "the little guy" is being destroyed by the BAR, and I continue begging you and others to JOIN WITH ME TO FORM AN ORGANIZATION to educate the rest of the population not only to what's happening but how to REVERSE THE INSANITY before we are totally enslaved by the wealthy and their tenacious hold on the judiciary!

I really don't think it matters.

The  problem is that you can only get a driver's license from one source, the DMV.
Normally that would violate antitrust Monopoly law, but because it's a government organization it's exempt from antitrust laws.

Parking tickets and traffic tickets are linked to our DMV records and we cannot renew our driver's license without paying the tickets. That's the problem.

And because each state can just make up their own rules willy-nilly without having to follow the Constitution, because of driving being a privilege, there's no legal recourse.

LET'S ALL WAKE UP PLEASE ! ! !

Hendrick v. Maryland, 235 U.S. 610 (1915), was not reversed; the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the Maryland Court of Appeals decision. The Court upheld Maryland's motor vehicle registration and licensing fees, ruling they were a valid exercise of state police power and did not violate the Commerce Clause.

Stop promoting lies ! ! !
To save our nation from the wealthy who control the judiciary, ALL OF YOU MUST WAKE UP and stop with the nonsense!

I never said it was reversed, I said we need to get it reversed or overturned

I have the course and the rules are that you basically have no rights when it comes to driving parking/traffic tickets.
They have a three-tiered contestation process which is the state's  facade of due process, however the reality is that they just railroad you.

No, I searched this, the Supreme Court ruling allows each state to pass their own laws as they see fit regarding vehicles and Licensing and how they're handled.

In California tickets are civil penalties. They apply to everyone and the state doesn't care about distinctions such as State citizen.

That is more Patriot mythology, as Alphonse would put it.

Charlie sprinkle tried that argument and ultimately failed, although whether or not he was able to drive without license and registration remains to be proven.
It may have been that the state got so fed up with him that they just left him alone after a while, but that's not because he was or wasn't a citizen of the state

How could a US supreme court case effect a citizen of a state?

You need to better understand your Constitutions and the authority of a court. Courts do not make law.

Parking tickets are not usually processed under the same articles in your statutes as traffic violations. And many of the traffic violations fall under different articles in your statutes as well. You are making a broad statement in your post that is really not applicable today.

What you might be trying to get at is that in the late 40s or so, US Congress passed a Federal Transportation Act that involved using cars and vehicles for commerce. When a state adopts a US act it must legislate those portions of the act that the state wants to adopt. If it can be shown that the state statutes derive from the US Transportation Act, then one can usually argue that they were not operating in commerce (if that is the case) and get the traffic violations that fell under that section of the code removed.

 It matters because there’s a difference between a collective and an individual. A private actor based on my understanding is an individual. Natural rights come from natural law, not positive law. People need to understand the importance of natural law in regards to jurisprudence.

 

Parking tickets however are different animals and fall under something like contract law with the owner of the street, usually the local municipality. Park anything there, it doesn’t have to be a vehicle, it could be a horse, a bicycle, a baby carriage, a trailer, and it will get a ticket if beyond the time allowed. So it is not handled the same way.

Hope this helps.

Traffic tickets and parking tickets don't need to follow the law per se, with regards to the Constitution and such, that's the point - the states can just make up whatever they want.
That's why you are guilty until proven innocent with regards to anything relating to driving a car.
It goes back to the privilege thing.