Educational Purpose

How often does holding a judge accountable for Canon Laws of Misconduct actually work?

Cause of Action: Fraud and Swindle by way of threats and coercion.. ???

A well written Pleading may yield a far better result.
Remember, you MUST Prove the Elements of your Cause Of Action.
Allege & Prove.

Essential Facts,Laws that apply to the Facts.
Procedures for getting your Evidence on Record.
Procedures to keep your opponent from submitting Evidence.
And Motions to get the Order you seek.

Simple, really.
The Jurisdictionary Course teaches you exactly that.

Hope this helps.
www.howtowinincourt.com?refercode=LB0034

 I've been through this at the appeals level. Due to a clerk's  misconduct, and the protectionist racketeering of the bar, found the courts unresponsive. Our Federal district court has a duns # owned by the state bar. At this point I'm looking at the commercial lien process for damages and due process violations, possibly the US court of claims and county supervisors. Enforcement is the issue, as always.

One notable successful Title 42, Section 1983 claim is "Monell v. Department of Social Services of the City of New York" (1978). In this landmark case, the U.S. Supreme Court held that municipalities can be held liable under Section 1983 for constitutional violations resulting from official policies or customs. This decision established that local governments could be sued for damages when their policies or practices lead to violations of civil rights.

The Elements of Style
by E.B. White and William Strunk Jr.

A good condition,used copy, can be picked up for under $10.

When writing a federal 1983 claim does one allege all the facts then the counts or can it be alleged facts then count then move on to the next defendant. Then their specific actions their duty breach of duty and harm.  Anyone have a sample of a successful 1983 claim?