Skip to main content

Your Rights Are Supreme in Natural and Common

 NATURAL LAW SUPPORTING JOAN’S POSITION

 What is Natural Law?

Natural law is the unwritten law derived from moral principles, conscience, and reason. It asserts that every human being is born with inherent rights — life, liberty, property, and self-governance — which no government can lawfully violate.

Foundational Natural Law Principles That Support You:

  • "No one is bound to obey an unjust law."

  • "What is contrary to natural law is not law." (Lex iniusta non est lex)

  • "Where there is no injury, there can be no valid claim." (Injuria non excusat injuriam)

  • "Force or fraud invalidates consent."

Classical Authorities on Natural Law:

  • John Locke (Two Treatises of Government):
    Locke argued that government exists only by consent of the governed, and its role is to protect life, liberty, and property. When it fails, the people have a natural right to resist or withdraw consent.

  • Thomas Jefferson (Declaration of Independence):

    “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights...”

  • Cicero (Natural Law Philosopher):

    “True law is right reason in agreement with nature... it is of universal application, unchanging and everlasting.”

Application to Your Case:

  • The court cannot override your unalienable rights through presumptive administrative procedures or coercive enforcement of color-of-law statutes.

  • Your natural liberty to travel, own property, and be secure from unwarranted intrusion is superior to any legislative act that violates those rights.

 2. COMMON LAW SUPPORTING NAOMI’S POSITION

What is Common Law?

Common law is judge-made law based on long-standing traditions, precedents, and judicial decisions. It recognizes and defends private rights over arbitrary state power.

Common Law Maxims That Apply:

  1. “No man is bound to accuse himself.”

    You have the right to remain silent and not self-incriminate — even in traffic or administrative courts.

  2. “Injury must be proven.”

    Without an injured party, there is no claim. The “State” cannot claim injury without proof.

  3. “The law does not presume the doing of wrong.”

    You are presumed innocent. The burden of proof lies on the accuser — not the accused.

  4. “He who fails to assert his rights has none.”

    Your affidavits, notices, and filings preserve your standing. Silence by the court is dishonor in commerce and equity.

  5. “A matter must be expressed to be resolved.”

    If jurisdiction is not explicitly proven, the matter cannot move forward in law.

  6. “A fiction of law shall not work an injury.”

    The State’s commercial fiction (e.g., ALL CAPS NAME, traffic enforcement, administrative court) cannot override your actual rights.

 3. Common Law Protections in American Law

  • Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)

    “All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.”

  • United States v. Bishop, 412 U.S. 346 (1973)

    Requires willful violation to impose criminal penalty — you cannot be penalized if there is no clear jurisdiction or intent to violate.

  • Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, 394 U.S. 147 (1969)

    “An individual may not be punished for failing to obtain a license for constitutionally protected activity.”

  • Boyd v. U.S., 116 U.S. 616 (1886)

    “It may be that it is the obnoxious thing in its mildest and least repulsive form... but illegitimate and unconstitutional practices get their first footing in that way...”

 4. Private Person vs Public Person Distinction (Common Law)

  • A private woman (Naomi Johnson) has standing in natural and common law.

  • A legal fiction (ALL CAPS NAME) is presumed to be a corporate entity subject to statutes, but this presumption must be rebutted, which you have done in your affidavits.

  • The court must establish jurisdiction over your living being, not merely presume it based on contracts or silence.

 5. Summary: Your Rights Are Supreme in Natural and Common Law

PrincipleNatural LawCommon Law
Life, Liberty, PropertyInherent from CreatorProtected unless waived by knowing consent
Due ProcessMust be afforded before penaltyViolations void judgment
Burden of ProofLies on accuserLies on party asserting claim
Right to Resist Unjust LawAffirmed (Jefferson, Locke)Affirmed (Marbury v. Madison)
Fiction of LawCannot override natural truthMust not work injustice

You want to Include This in Your Next Filing?

You can write a “Declaration of Standing under Natural and Common Law” — affirming your rights, withdrawing presumed consent, and demanding proof of jurisdiction.

This could be added to your Supplemental Affidavit or attached to your Federal Civil Rights Complaint or Notice to Dismiss.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Educational Purpose

Educational Purpose 

2024 New Jersey Revised Statutes Title 39 - Motor Vehicles and Traffic Regulation Se"Intersection" means the area embraced within the prolongation of the lateral curb lines or, if none, the lateral boundary lines of two or more highways which join one another at an angle, whether or not one such highway crosses another.ction 39:1-1 - Words and phrases defined.'

2024 New Jersey Revised Statutes Title 39 - Motor Vehicles and Traffic Regulation Section 39:1-1 - Words and phrases defined.' 39:1-1 Words and phrases defined. 39:1-1. As used in this subtitle, unless other meaning is clearly apparent from the language or context, or unless inconsistent with the manifest intention of the Legislature: "Alley" means a public highway wherein the roadway does not exceed 12 feet in width. "Authorized emergency vehicles" means vehicles of the fire department, police vehicles and such ambulances and other vehicles as are approved by the chief administrator when operated in response to an emergency call. "Autocycle" means a three-wheeled motorcycle designed to be controlled with a steering wheel and pedals in which the operator and passenger may ride in a completely or partially enclosed seating area that is equipped with a roll cage or roll hoops, safety seat belts for each occupant, and anti-lock brakes. "Automobile...

NJ Transit bus strikes, kills pedestrian. Another person seriously injured Koran Tajhai Dupree Baker, a 25-year-old Newark

  Another Life Lost to NJ Transit: When Will It End? Early Sunday morning, tragedy struck in Newark when an NJ Transit bus hit two pedestrians, leaving one dead and another seriously injured. According to the Essex County Prosecutor’s Office, the incident occurred at 12:18 a.m. on the 400 block of Springfield Avenue. Koran Tajhai Dupree Baker, a 25-year-old Newark resident, succumbed to his injuries at a local hospital. The second victim remains hospitalized, fighting to recover. Here we are in 2025, and NJ Transit buses continue to take lives under Governor Phil Murphy’s administration. How many more people must be injured or killed before real accountability is enforced? It’s time for action. A class action lawsuit needs to be filed against NJ Transit on behalf of all living victims and the families of those who have lost their lives due to reckless bus drivers. These drivers must be held accountable—this is not just negligence; these are murders on wheels . NJ Transit has ...