New Jersey Rules Of Court

 The Court System 

@DixieVixen:the legal system by no means stays within the realm of the Constitution

@❌️ Chris Duncan ❌️:An officer who acts in violation of the Constitution ceases to represent the government," is from the case Brookfield Const. Co. v. Stewart, 284 F. Supp. 94 (D.D.C. 1964). This principle means that if a government official violates the constitution, they are acting outside the authority granted to them, and their actions are no longer official acts of the government they are sworn to uphold. This can lead to legal consequences, as their actions are not protected by their office and can be challenged in court. Ex Parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908)What it specifically says: The Supreme Court ruled that a state officer who attempts to enforce an unconstitutional act is "stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct." Frédéric Bastiat argued that when plunder becomes a way of life, society creates a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it. He defined this "legalized plunder" as the state using force to transfer wealth from its rightful owner to someone else, dressing up theft as law and policy to normalize it. 1974 — Scheuer v. Rhodes (416 U.S. 232): The modern Supreme Court confirms your exact independent creator architecture. The High Court ruled that when an executive officer steps outside the strict boundaries of the written public trust to run an arbitrary enforcement custom, their qualified immunity drops to an absolute zero, leaving their personal bank accounts, deferred portfolios, and real estate wide open to full financial restitution. 1922 — United States v. State Investment Co. (264 U.S. 206): The Supreme Court settled that no public clerk or corporate agent can use a government badge or uniform to shield an asset or a status born out of a property trespass. The High Court confirmed that the state cannot authorize a wrong, leaving the acting individual clerks personally exposed to a public liquidation.

@❌️ Chris Duncan ❌️:Are you sure? "The individual, unlike the corporation, cannot be taxed for the mere privilege of existing" is true. This was ruled in the case Redfield v. Fisher. Stare decisis is a legal doctrine that requires courts to follow the principles of previous cases when deciding similar cases. The term comes from Latin and means "to stand by things decided. "Once a fraud, always a fraud." 13 Vin. Abr. 539.

• Things invalid from the beginning cannot be

made valid by subsequent act." Trayner, Max

482. Maxims of Law, Black's Law Dictionary 9th

Edition, page 1862

• A thing void in the beginning does not become

valid by lapse of time." 1 S. & R. 58. Maxims of

Law, Black's Law Dictionary 9th Edition, page 1866

• Time cannot render valid an act void in its origin

Dig. 50, 17, 29; Broom, Max. 178, Maxims of Law.

Black's Law Dictionary 9th Edition, page 1862. Knowledge by itself is not power, but it holds the potential for power if we use it a s a guide for action. Truth will always be defeated by tyranny unless the people are willing to step forward and put their lives into the battle. The future belongs, not to ideas, but to people who act on those ideas.

G. Edward Griffin.