Skip to main content

The Great Constitutional "Hand-Off": Popular Sovereignty vs. The Administrative State

The Great Constitutional "Hand-Off": Popular Sovereignty vs. The Administrative State

Most Americans are taught that the government grants us our rights. But if you look at the "Black Letter" law and the original intent of the Founders, the truth is exactly the opposite: The People are the source of all power, and the government is merely a tenant on our land.

In this post, we’re going to pull back the curtain on how "police power," administrative codes, and the legal profession have created a system that often operates outside the boundaries of the Constitution.

1. Sovereignty: "We the People" are the Boss

The Preamble of the United States Constitution begins with three of the most powerful words in history: "We the People." This isn’t just poetic language; it is a legal declaration of Popular Sovereignty.

  • The Power Source: The People govern the government. The government does not govern the People.

  • The Tenth Amendment: Often misunderstood as a "grant" of power to the states, the Tenth Amendment is actually a reservation. It confirms that any power not specifically given to the Federal government stays with the States, or, more importantly, with the People.

2. The Rise of "Police Power" and Administrative Law

If the People have the power, how did we end up with thousands of pages of traffic codes and regulations? This comes down to the concept of "Police Power."

In your typical Administrative Law class, you’ll learn that states have the authority to protect "public health, safety, and welfare." However, there is a catch:

  • Original Intent: This power was meant to regulate business and public conduct to prevent harm to others.

  • The Modern Reality: Today, this power has morphed into an "Administrative State." Instead of common law (justice between people), we now deal with statutes, codes, and ordinances. These are often "quasi-judicial" systems designed to generate revenue rather than provide constitutional remedy.

3. The "Bar" Between the People and Justice

Have you ever noticed that attorneys don't have a "license" in the same way a doctor does? Instead, they have a Bar Card and an Admission to Practice.

  • The Bar Association: As noted in many constitutional studies, the American Bar Association (ABA) is a private organization, not a branch of government.

  • The Statutory Lawyer: Most modern lawyers are "statutory lawyers." While they take an oath to the Constitution, they often operate under the rules of the "Bar," which can act as a foreign entity (similar to those registered under FARA) that prioritizes administrative efficiency over individual rights.

4. The "Missing Signature" and the De Facto Officer

A government official's authority is only as good as their Oath of Office. In states like New Jersey, an officer is required to "subscribe" to their oath.

  • To Subscribe means to Sign: A typed name is not enough. To be a "De Jure" (lawful) officer, there must be a wet signature, a physical "contract" between the officer and the People.

  • The De Facto Risk: If an officer, like a Sergeant of Police, fails to sign his oath, he may be acting as a De Facto officer. He has the uniform and the badge, but he lacks the completed legal paperwork required to exercise authority over the People.

Summary: Reclaiming the Narrative

As Abraham Lincoln famously said in the Gettysburg Address, this is a government "of the people, by the people, for the people." When we see traffic courts acting as business transactions or officials failing to properly subscribe to their oaths, we are seeing a shift toward a "quasi-government" that treats citizens as subjects. By returning to the "Black Letter" study of our Constitution and understanding the etymology of legal terms, we can begin to see the system for what it is, and remind the government who actually holds the power.

Remember: You can fool some of the people all of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time. It’s time to stop being fooled by administrative "guile" and get back to Constitutional Law. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Educational Purpose

Educational Purpose 

2024 New Jersey Revised Statutes Title 39 - Motor Vehicles and Traffic Regulation Se"Intersection" means the area embraced within the prolongation of the lateral curb lines or, if none, the lateral boundary lines of two or more highways which join one another at an angle, whether or not one such highway crosses another.ction 39:1-1 - Words and phrases defined.'

2024 New Jersey Revised Statutes Title 39 - Motor Vehicles and Traffic Regulation Section 39:1-1 - Words and phrases defined.' 39:1-1 Words and phrases defined. 39:1-1. As used in this subtitle, unless other meaning is clearly apparent from the language or context, or unless inconsistent with the manifest intention of the Legislature: "Alley" means a public highway wherein the roadway does not exceed 12 feet in width. "Authorized emergency vehicles" means vehicles of the fire department, police vehicles and such ambulances and other vehicles as are approved by the chief administrator when operated in response to an emergency call. "Autocycle" means a three-wheeled motorcycle designed to be controlled with a steering wheel and pedals in which the operator and passenger may ride in a completely or partially enclosed seating area that is equipped with a roll cage or roll hoops, safety seat belts for each occupant, and anti-lock brakes. "Automobile...

NJ Transit bus strikes, kills pedestrian. Another person seriously injured Koran Tajhai Dupree Baker, a 25-year-old Newark

  Another Life Lost to NJ Transit: When Will It End? Early Sunday morning, tragedy struck in Newark when an NJ Transit bus hit two pedestrians, leaving one dead and another seriously injured. According to the Essex County Prosecutor’s Office, the incident occurred at 12:18 a.m. on the 400 block of Springfield Avenue. Koran Tajhai Dupree Baker, a 25-year-old Newark resident, succumbed to his injuries at a local hospital. The second victim remains hospitalized, fighting to recover. Here we are in 2025, and NJ Transit buses continue to take lives under Governor Phil Murphy’s administration. How many more people must be injured or killed before real accountability is enforced? It’s time for action. A class action lawsuit needs to be filed against NJ Transit on behalf of all living victims and the families of those who have lost their lives due to reckless bus drivers. These drivers must be held accountable—this is not just negligence; these are murders on wheels . NJ Transit has ...