Case Law Caretaker Doctrine When Police Officer Tow Your Conveyance/Car For Unregistered Car
Here are the heavy hitters you should look into. When you write your reply, you aren't just saying "it's unfair," you are saying "Defendant William violated the standards.
State v. Ercolano (New Jersey Supreme Court)
While this is a state case, federal courts often look at state law to see if an officer's "caretaking" was reasonable. In Ercolano, the court ruled that police cannot use a tow as a "pretext" to search a car when there are other reasonable alternatives (like leaving the car where it is or letting a friend drive it).
South Dakota v. Opperman (Supreme Court)
This is the "Grandfather" case. It established that police can tow/inventory a car without a warrant only for:
Protecting the owner's property.
Protecting police from claims of lost/stolen property.
Protecting police from potential danger.
The Argument: If your car was locked, legally parked, and contained nothing dangerous, none of these "caretaking" needs existed.
This information if the Judge trying to violate the People right.
Canons and Federal Questions
Canon Law/Ethics: Violating a Judicial Canon (Rule 1, 2, or 3) is a matter for the Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct (ACJC). Federal civil courts generally do not use Canon violations as a way to strip a judge of immunity in a lawsuit for money.
Constitutional Questions: You can ask the Prosecutor and Police if they were aware that [Specific Precedent] prohibits warrantless tows. This "boxes them in" by proving they had "knowledge" of the law, which helps you defeat Qualified Immunity.
Comments
Post a Comment