Educational Purpose

 Dude named Ben:

Has anyone addressed the problem of people in court being viewed as a legal fiction?

elise:
For now gather their lawyer number, if they’re current, any BAR information, even their oath on this petty lawyer, see if he had complaints (he’s a newbie if i remember correctly so that might be unlikely but I discovered “tricks” on a 20+yr lawyer last week who was ….. through BAR complaints and punished — sorry forgot what those verbs are and what the punishment was but he’s still practicing).
I learned his dirty tricks which help me see what NOT  to fall for and recognize so I can immediately tell the judge.

If he keeps doing petty stuff you can tell the judge and/or file something against him as an attorney who took an oath at the place where they signed their oath (differs fir each).
So far I have everyone’s info and I let them know I do—two since retired, unsure if that’s related— I have not filed any official complaints yet however the BAR said I should, but Dr. Graves advised me not to (so I didn’t yet but if and when I file in court they’re factual actions will all be included because their lying and making up evidence directly caused me damages so even if I don’t sue them directly, the defendant might have to consider suing them if they think it’s intentional and in their name, all government stuff)

Yes he is playing games scribbleing out the address and writing undeliverable. I didn't fall for that. I'm going to send it directly to him. My local clerk suggested to file that a delivery attempt was sufficient.

Not ALL judges are crooked. Most are doing the best they can with the chicanery of the typical greedy, lying, deceitful lawyers they have to deal with on a daily basis.
And, thank you for disagreeing with me in public, Catherine.
That helps others to trust me and my work.

CJ ... Your complaint reads like an appellate brief.
That is NOT what your initial complaint should do.
You are inviting a successful Motion to Dismiss.
Allege facts and move the court for judgment with a WHEREFORE clause as I teach in my courses at www.HowToWinInCourt.com and www.Jurisdictionary.com

All explained in my class on Motions and Hearings.

People are not legal fictions, and those who try to be soon learn better.

I am also seeing that he did not verify the pleadings. I would say that is very necessary as this can add credibility.

I just looked again and there was no verification of the pleadings. Very important. Especially for a pro se litigant.

Actually for the court to take you seriously verifying the complaint is pretty important. I even know of a victorious lawyer who seriously recommends it. @Jurisdictionary - is that right?

See Certificate Of Service,in the course.

Can we set up a firm of Certified Litigators non-BAR?

What would that look like,in the form of a business plan?

Registering as an ABS

Thank God for “How to Win in Court”!!! It’s been a long ordeal, but I got what I was after… a dismissal!!!! I have been crying tears of joy and relief. If it wasn’t for the classes, I would’ve never had the confidence to go forth pro se.  there were some things I picked up on my own such as how to properly label exhibits and understanding joinders. However, the bulk of my learning came from the course. I have recently signed up on the new jurisdictionary.com to take the courses there as well.  Dr. Graves, you are a GODSEND!!! I don’t know how to thank you enough.  Several people including co-defendants (who hired attorneys) have been asking where I learned everything. I’m pointing them in your direction. Thank you again.😀

Kit Henry:
What do you envision for this team? Would it constitute ‘laymen’ or attorneys or investors or other?


All of those ... united in agreement on core principles and practices.
Team members may disagree about other things but share GENUINE POWER by agreeing on those core principles and practices that cut through the misinformation and anti-government propaganda.
We will restore the Geometry of Good Government by controlling our Courts and influencing the leaders in our places of worship to promote this God-honoring mission!


It is inevitable. I know the right ones will hear and see. And change the world because of it

Here are clear examples where you crossed from facts into legal argument/conclusions:
1. Page 5
“These last-minute changes amount to election interference, which violates Article 2 § 21 of the Arizona Constitution.”
That’s a legal conclusion. The fact would be: the deadline changed from April 6 to March 23. The conclusion is that it constitutes “election interference.” That’s for the court to decide.
2. Page 6
“These two ‘emergency’ bills were not emergencies.”
That is purely a legal conclusion. A fact would be describing what the bill said in its emergency section and what it didn’t say. Whether that rises or falls to the level of a constitutional emergency is the court’s call.
3. Page 7
“The judicial department should hold a higher standard for an ‘emergency’ for election matters…”
That’s straight up legal argument. That belongs in a brief, not a complaint.
4. Page 8
“The constitutionally-mandated procedural rule…is not a right exclusive to the 90 legislators, but to all Arizona citizens.”
Again — legal conclusion and argument, not a fact.

So,  if you wanted to follow Graves strictly, probably half the complaint needs to come out. The complaint should have been much shorter and stuck strictly to: what the legislature did, what deadlines changed, how it affected you specifically. Period.

Hope this helps. Don’t take my critique personally….just here to help.