Skip to main content

Information On Jury Trial

 Never select a juror who is outwardly very friendly, works for an insurance company, smiles at you and seems to be on your side. Younger jurors aren't usually a good choice or are potentials who are too well dressed. I'd rather have a bench trial because only the judge can be faulted for the wrong decision. Jurors are generally not very intelligent.

Truth! Also, never pick a juror who is either law enforcement or related to someone in LE…


I have heard that a few times that you may be better off with a bench trial so you can hold the judge accountable.

I was pro se in a 2 week trial. While selecting jurors, one candidate told me that she was very allergic to dogs and had noticed that I had a tiny toy poodle in a carrier under my desk. There was no way she could have known that! No one knew that I had a little dog hidden, but someone told her in ex parte communications which is strictly forbidden. I told the woman my dog is hypoallergenic because poodles have hair like humans, not fur. I should have vehemently objected and asked for an entirely new pool of jurors because that woman tainted the jury pool. No one knew that I had a dog hidden in a secret dog purse.

This leads me to my next point in a court of law. A pro se litigant cannot object enough! If one doesn't object, that issue is forever waived on appeal. It's gotten to the point, in one of my last court appearances a judge stated., I know Mrs. Albertini! You object to everything said here today. This leads to my next comment, judges pretty much think out loud in court and what they say should always be used against them because when they think out loud they are usually saying something that they shouldn't in order to impress the clerks and other lawyers who are present.

I've litigated my own case pro se is in a 2 week trial. I would never, in hindsight, choose a jury trial again. The margin of error is 13 to one vis-a-vis a bench trial (12 jurors plus 1 judge). Jurors tend to be more subconsciously biased. They aren't particularly bright either. With a bench trial any errors rest squarely on the judge and can't be explained off as "you had a fair trial decision by a jury of your peers." Trust me, they likely aren't your peers.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New Jersey Rules Of Court

3:2-Contents of Complaints, Arrest Warrant and Summons 3:2-1-Contents of Complaint; Citizen Complaints for Indictable Offenses; Forwarding of Indictable Complaints to Prosecutor and Criminal Division Manager; Forwarding of Investigative Reports to Prosecutor You can read more of the Municipal Courts procedure that the Administrative Judge Law/Municipal Judge Law who is an Administrative Judge. 3:2-2-Summons A summons shall be made on a Complaint-Summons (CDR-1) form, a Uniform Traffic Ticket, a Special Form of Complaint and Summons, or such other form as may be approved by the Administrative Director of the Courts. The summons shall be directed to the person named in the complaint, requiring that person to appear before the court in which the complaint is made at a stated time and place, and shall indicate that there will be consequences for failure to appear at the scheduled first appearance. If the individual fails to appear at that first appearance, a notice shall issue advising the...

NJ Transit bus strikes, kills pedestrian. Another person seriously injured Koran Tajhai Dupree Baker, a 25-year-old Newark

  Another Life Lost to NJ Transit: When Will It End? Early Sunday morning, tragedy struck in Newark when an NJ Transit bus hit two pedestrians, leaving one dead and another seriously injured. According to the Essex County Prosecutor’s Office, the incident occurred at 12:18 a.m. on the 400 block of Springfield Avenue. Koran Tajhai Dupree Baker, a 25-year-old Newark resident, succumbed to his injuries at a local hospital. The second victim remains hospitalized, fighting to recover. Here we are in 2025, and NJ Transit buses continue to take lives under Governor Phil Murphy’s administration. How many more people must be injured or killed before real accountability is enforced? It’s time for action. A class action lawsuit needs to be filed against NJ Transit on behalf of all living victims and the families of those who have lost their lives due to reckless bus drivers. These drivers must be held accountable—this is not just negligence; these are murders on wheels . NJ Transit has ...
 "The federal statutes that force my opponent to comply with discovery are Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, 34, and 37. Rule 34 requires production within 30 days of a request. Rule 37 allows me to file a Motion to Compel if they fail to produce, and authorizes the Court to impose sanctions, award fees, strike their pleadings, or enter default judgment for willful non-compliance. Rule 37(e) also addresses spoliation of electronically stored information including body-worn camera footage and CAD records. In the District of New Jersey, Local Civil Rule 37.1 required me to complete a meet and confer before filing — which I completed on April 30, 2026." If you are trying to compel discovery and don't know what local rules and statutes govern compliance, you are wasting your time, and showing that you might not know what you are doing and aren't credible. This is akin to the tail wagging the dog or putting the cart before the horse. Sending a notice to opposing counsel achieves nothing...