Educational Purpose

 Right. I did read the above document. It gives you the pros and cons of keeping or dropping the FDEM.

My case is a bit different. I am filing suit against 2 sheriffs deputies, the county prosecutors office, and my local city court judge and his staff. I was charged with Disorderly Conduct for cussing out an officer and I fought my criminal case as a Pro Se for 11 months. I ultimately prevailed against them all and the Circuit Court judge ruled in my favor and dismissed my case; ruling that the charge against me was unconstitutional. But throughout those 11 months, I endured multiple violations of my rights and the attempt to railroad me at the city court level was just unbelievable. Funny thing is, is that the entire time these bad actors were attempting to railroad me and violate my rights, they were stupid enough to make all of their actions known to the point that I have nearly every one of their actions documented. I have even been able to figure out how to defeat their ‘absolute immunity’. The county prosecutor stepped in a big pile of you-know-what when she decided to be unprofessional and call me out on social media and say that she didn’t agree with the courts ruling, etc.

courts like to use Huynh to justify using complaint. i would not use it

but there are a lot of cases that say that is what is used in a municipal court.  Most likely even with them using an unlawful complaint., it is probably void for vagueness or somehow unconstitutional since they most of the time parrot the language in the ordinance.  But, have you seen one case that was won or overturned using the argument about the primary pleadings in lieu of a complaint?

I have not, and I see the opposite when arguing that it must be an indictment or information instead of a complaint. That's why I attacked the citation as not being a valid complaint. Though I now realize Huynh was from before TCCP 45 was repealed.