Skip to main content

 Right. I did read the above document. It gives you the pros and cons of keeping or dropping the FDEM.


My case is a bit different. I am filing suit against 2 sheriffs deputies, the county prosecutors office, and my local city court judge and his staff. I was charged with Disorderly Conduct for cussing out an officer and I fought my criminal case as a Pro Se for 11 months. I ultimately prevailed against them all and the Circuit Court judge ruled in my favor and dismissed my case; ruling that the charge against me was unconstitutional. But throughout those 11 months, I endured multiple violations of my rights and the attempt to railroad me at the city court level was just unbelievable. Funny thing is, is that the entire time these bad actors were attempting to railroad me and violate my rights, they were stupid enough to make all of their actions known to the point that I have nearly every one of their actions documented. I have even been able to figure out how to defeat their ‘absolute immunity’. The county prosecutor stepped in a big pile of you-know-what when she decided to be unprofessional and call me out on social media and say that she didn’t agree with the courts ruling, etc.
courts like to use Huynh to justify using complaint. i would not use it
but there are a lot of cases that say that is what is used in a municipal court.  Most likely even with them using an unlawful complaint., it is probably void for vagueness or somehow unconstitutional since they most of the time parrot the language in the ordinance.  But, have you seen one case that was won or overturned using the argument about the primary pleadings in lieu of a complaint?
I have not, and I see the opposite when arguing that it must be an indictment or information instead of a complaint. That's why I attacked the citation as not being a valid complaint. Though I now realize Huynh was from before TCCP 45 was repealed.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

New Jersey Rules Of Court

3:2-Contents of Complaints, Arrest Warrant and Summons 3:2-1-Contents of Complaint; Citizen Complaints for Indictable Offenses; Forwarding of Indictable Complaints to Prosecutor and Criminal Division Manager; Forwarding of Investigative Reports to Prosecutor You can read more of the Municipal Courts procedure that the Administrative Judge Law/Municipal Judge Law who is an Administrative Judge. 3:2-2-Summons A summons shall be made on a Complaint-Summons (CDR-1) form, a Uniform Traffic Ticket, a Special Form of Complaint and Summons, or such other form as may be approved by the Administrative Director of the Courts. The summons shall be directed to the person named in the complaint, requiring that person to appear before the court in which the complaint is made at a stated time and place, and shall indicate that there will be consequences for failure to appear at the scheduled first appearance. If the individual fails to appear at that first appearance, a notice shall issue advising the...
Post a Comment
Read more

NJ Transit bus strikes, kills pedestrian. Another person seriously injured Koran Tajhai Dupree Baker, a 25-year-old Newark

  Another Life Lost to NJ Transit: When Will It End? Early Sunday morning, tragedy struck in Newark when an NJ Transit bus hit two pedestrians, leaving one dead and another seriously injured. According to the Essex County Prosecutor’s Office, the incident occurred at 12:18 a.m. on the 400 block of Springfield Avenue. Koran Tajhai Dupree Baker, a 25-year-old Newark resident, succumbed to his injuries at a local hospital. The second victim remains hospitalized, fighting to recover. Here we are in 2025, and NJ Transit buses continue to take lives under Governor Phil Murphy’s administration. How many more people must be injured or killed before real accountability is enforced? It’s time for action. A class action lawsuit needs to be filed against NJ Transit on behalf of all living victims and the families of those who have lost their lives due to reckless bus drivers. These drivers must be held accountable—this is not just negligence; these are murders on wheels . NJ Transit has ...
Post a Comment
Read more
 "The federal statutes that force my opponent to comply with discovery are Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, 34, and 37. Rule 34 requires production within 30 days of a request. Rule 37 allows me to file a Motion to Compel if they fail to produce, and authorizes the Court to impose sanctions, award fees, strike their pleadings, or enter default judgment for willful non-compliance. Rule 37(e) also addresses spoliation of electronically stored information including body-worn camera footage and CAD records. In the District of New Jersey, Local Civil Rule 37.1 required me to complete a meet and confer before filing — which I completed on April 30, 2026." If you are trying to compel discovery and don't know what local rules and statutes govern compliance, you are wasting your time, and showing that you might not know what you are doing and aren't credible. This is akin to the tail wagging the dog or putting the cart before the horse. Sending a notice to opposing counsel achieves nothing...
Post a Comment
Read more