Skip to main content

 That is why I put plates on my Avlanche that say, "Dead Heading."  It gives notice that I am not operating in commerce and although I have entered into a commercial agreement with the state which will allow me to use the highways in comomerce, the dead heaing plates gives notice that I am not operating under that contract.   Being forced to display evidence of a private commercial contract would violate my 4th amentment right to privacy of my papers.

put the plates on the suburban so all my cars and trucks are privet now, let the games begin

My Avalanche is plated.  I can operate it in commerce if I want to.  I have a valid driver's license and can use it in commerce if I choose.  So, the only violation they can show is a failure to publicly display evidence of a private contract.  I am looking forward to that fight, but the last time the DPS pulled me over, they wrote a warning, and I had a fit.  I demanded my ticket, even demanded that the officer take off his chicken suit. 
They know what the law is.  They just want to ignore it and coerce you into buying their bullshit.

The Rule of Law Radio show from 2026/01/30 is now in the archives!

https://t.me/ROLRshow/357

The Rule of Law Radio show from 2026/01/29 is now in the archives!

https://t.me/ROLRshow/356


but there are a lot of cases that say that is what is used in a municipal court.  Most likely even with them using an unlawful complaint., it is probably void for vagueness or somehow unconstitutional since they most of the time parrot the language in the ordinance.  But, have you seen one case that was won or overturned using the argument about the primary pleadings in lieu of a complaint?


yes, the Huynh opinion came out in 1995, relying on an unconstitutional provision (TCCP 45.01) that used to exist in 1995.

our legislature fixed that problem by repealing the unconstitutional provision in its entirety, effective 1999.

every single bar attorney from 1999 to the present day continues to rely on that REPEALED statute as if it still exists, evidently in a vain attempt to pretend there's some legitimacy or legal support for their unlawful de facto pattern and practice to deprive defendants of the due process of law.

EDIT: is that what you were wondering about?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

New Jersey Rules Of Court

3:2-Contents of Complaints, Arrest Warrant and Summons 3:2-1-Contents of Complaint; Citizen Complaints for Indictable Offenses; Forwarding of Indictable Complaints to Prosecutor and Criminal Division Manager; Forwarding of Investigative Reports to Prosecutor You can read more of the Municipal Courts procedure that the Administrative Judge Law/Municipal Judge Law who is an Administrative Judge. 3:2-2-Summons A summons shall be made on a Complaint-Summons (CDR-1) form, a Uniform Traffic Ticket, a Special Form of Complaint and Summons, or such other form as may be approved by the Administrative Director of the Courts. The summons shall be directed to the person named in the complaint, requiring that person to appear before the court in which the complaint is made at a stated time and place, and shall indicate that there will be consequences for failure to appear at the scheduled first appearance. If the individual fails to appear at that first appearance, a notice shall issue advising the...
Post a Comment
Read more

NJ Transit bus strikes, kills pedestrian. Another person seriously injured Koran Tajhai Dupree Baker, a 25-year-old Newark

  Another Life Lost to NJ Transit: When Will It End? Early Sunday morning, tragedy struck in Newark when an NJ Transit bus hit two pedestrians, leaving one dead and another seriously injured. According to the Essex County Prosecutor’s Office, the incident occurred at 12:18 a.m. on the 400 block of Springfield Avenue. Koran Tajhai Dupree Baker, a 25-year-old Newark resident, succumbed to his injuries at a local hospital. The second victim remains hospitalized, fighting to recover. Here we are in 2025, and NJ Transit buses continue to take lives under Governor Phil Murphy’s administration. How many more people must be injured or killed before real accountability is enforced? It’s time for action. A class action lawsuit needs to be filed against NJ Transit on behalf of all living victims and the families of those who have lost their lives due to reckless bus drivers. These drivers must be held accountable—this is not just negligence; these are murders on wheels . NJ Transit has ...
Post a Comment
Read more
 "The federal statutes that force my opponent to comply with discovery are Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, 34, and 37. Rule 34 requires production within 30 days of a request. Rule 37 allows me to file a Motion to Compel if they fail to produce, and authorizes the Court to impose sanctions, award fees, strike their pleadings, or enter default judgment for willful non-compliance. Rule 37(e) also addresses spoliation of electronically stored information including body-worn camera footage and CAD records. In the District of New Jersey, Local Civil Rule 37.1 required me to complete a meet and confer before filing — which I completed on April 30, 2026." If you are trying to compel discovery and don't know what local rules and statutes govern compliance, you are wasting your time, and showing that you might not know what you are doing and aren't credible. This is akin to the tail wagging the dog or putting the cart before the horse. Sending a notice to opposing counsel achieves nothing...
Post a Comment
Read more