Skip to main content

 So, if you make a declaration, the court is not going to check a pro-se's filings for errors? .... I have a hard time believing that. I would sooner believe that this ruling will protect bar members while allowing those same bar members to challenge a pro-se's filings without any evidence. We all know the courts will protect believe fellow bar members over pro-se litigants in courtroom proceedings..... I stand on my claim that it is a stupid ruling that will do nothing to protect us from bad filings from bar members. I realize I sound cynical, but it is not unwarranted.

No, your appellate court case never made it past the gatekeeper to become a formal case. Your petition was denied because it did not meet the threshold that the Appellate Court applies of “extraordinary relief”. There were 2 thresholds that needed to be met:
1) technical - timeliness, and all the right documents filed
2) appropriateness in the Appellate Court which according to the statutes is “extraordinary relief”.

So the petition maybe did not argue this strongly enough, but there is nothing wrong with the denial order. It is not an opinion so it does not need all the case details or legalisms that an opinion needs.


Yes, Hendrick v. Maryland is a U.S. Supreme Court case.

Full citation: Hendrick v. Maryland, 235 U.S. 610 (1915)

Decided on January 5, 1915
Unanimous decision (9-0) written by Justice McReynolds.

It is binding Supreme Court precedent on the federal constitutional level, meaning it applies nationwide and overrides conflicting state law or lower court rulings under the Supremacy Clause.

This is the case that established the framework for states requiring driver's licenses and vehicle registration as a valid exercise of police power, treating driving on public roads as a regulatable privilege rather than an unrestricted right.

The process of getting any court ruling overturned is to have another case come up from the lower courts which is based on the same legal authority and argue that the standing opinion is not correct and the reasons it is not correct. Hope this helps.

So they scan your license plate and from your registration information they can determine whether you have insurance or not?

You need to check your rules / codes and see if you are required to “show proof of insurance”. A search of your tag doesn’t show proof of insurance. Also if you check the codes for your state, it will tell you if you can show proof of insurance within a specific timeframe to avoid any fines.
Hope this helps.

https://jurisdictionary.com/you-know-what-justice-is/

https://jurisdictionary.com/overview/


https://jurisdictionary.com/two-kinds-of-government/


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NJ Transit bus strikes, kills pedestrian. Another person seriously injured Koran Tajhai Dupree Baker, a 25-year-old Newark

  Another Life Lost to NJ Transit: When Will It End? Early Sunday morning, tragedy struck in Newark when an NJ Transit bus hit two pedestrians, leaving one dead and another seriously injured. According to the Essex County Prosecutor’s Office, the incident occurred at 12:18 a.m. on the 400 block of Springfield Avenue. Koran Tajhai Dupree Baker, a 25-year-old Newark resident, succumbed to his injuries at a local hospital. The second victim remains hospitalized, fighting to recover. Here we are in 2025, and NJ Transit buses continue to take lives under Governor Phil Murphy’s administration. How many more people must be injured or killed before real accountability is enforced? It’s time for action. A class action lawsuit needs to be filed against NJ Transit on behalf of all living victims and the families of those who have lost their lives due to reckless bus drivers. These drivers must be held accountable—this is not just negligence; these are murders on wheels . NJ Transit has ...

NJ Transit Deadly Train Engineer Killed A Man In Neptune NJ

  Street Blog New Jersey: Man Struck, Killed By NJ Transit Train In Neptune: Officials Stephen B. Mangold of Bardonia, New York was struck around 11:50 a.m. near 11th Avenue in Neptune on Monday, officials said. (Shutterstock) NEPTUNE, NJ - A New York man was pronounced dead on Monday after being struck by a Long Branch-bound New Jersey Transit train in Neptune, officials said. Stephen B. Mangold, 54, of Bardonia, New York was struck and fatally injured at approximately 11:50 a.m. near 11th Avenue and Main Street in Neptune, a New Jersey Transit official told Patch. The train departed Bay Head at 11:21 a.m. and was scheduled to arrive at Long Branch at 12 p.m., the spokesman said. There were approximately 60 people on board the train at the time of the incident.

New Jersey Rules Of Court

3:2-Contents of Complaints, Arrest Warrant and Summons 3:2-1-Contents of Complaint; Citizen Complaints for Indictable Offenses; Forwarding of Indictable Complaints to Prosecutor and Criminal Division Manager; Forwarding of Investigative Reports to Prosecutor You can read more of the Municipal Courts procedure that the Administrative Judge Law/Municipal Judge Law who is an Administrative Judge. 3:2-2-Summons A summons shall be made on a Complaint-Summons (CDR-1) form, a Uniform Traffic Ticket, a Special Form of Complaint and Summons, or such other form as may be approved by the Administrative Director of the Courts. The summons shall be directed to the person named in the complaint, requiring that person to appear before the court in which the complaint is made at a stated time and place, and shall indicate that there will be consequences for failure to appear at the scheduled first appearance. If the individual fails to appear at that first appearance, a notice shall issue advising the...