Skip to main content

 So, if you make a declaration, the court is not going to check a pro-se's filings for errors? .... I have a hard time believing that. I would sooner believe that this ruling will protect bar members while allowing those same bar members to challenge a pro-se's filings without any evidence. We all know the courts will protect believe fellow bar members over pro-se litigants in courtroom proceedings..... I stand on my claim that it is a stupid ruling that will do nothing to protect us from bad filings from bar members. I realize I sound cynical, but it is not unwarranted.

No, your appellate court case never made it past the gatekeeper to become a formal case. Your petition was denied because it did not meet the threshold that the Appellate Court applies of “extraordinary relief”. There were 2 thresholds that needed to be met:
1) technical - timeliness, and all the right documents filed
2) appropriateness in the Appellate Court which according to the statutes is “extraordinary relief”.

So the petition maybe did not argue this strongly enough, but there is nothing wrong with the denial order. It is not an opinion so it does not need all the case details or legalisms that an opinion needs.


Yes, Hendrick v. Maryland is a U.S. Supreme Court case.

Full citation: Hendrick v. Maryland, 235 U.S. 610 (1915)

Decided on January 5, 1915
Unanimous decision (9-0) written by Justice McReynolds.

It is binding Supreme Court precedent on the federal constitutional level, meaning it applies nationwide and overrides conflicting state law or lower court rulings under the Supremacy Clause.

This is the case that established the framework for states requiring driver's licenses and vehicle registration as a valid exercise of police power, treating driving on public roads as a regulatable privilege rather than an unrestricted right.

The process of getting any court ruling overturned is to have another case come up from the lower courts which is based on the same legal authority and argue that the standing opinion is not correct and the reasons it is not correct. Hope this helps.

So they scan your license plate and from your registration information they can determine whether you have insurance or not?

You need to check your rules / codes and see if you are required to “show proof of insurance”. A search of your tag doesn’t show proof of insurance. Also if you check the codes for your state, it will tell you if you can show proof of insurance within a specific timeframe to avoid any fines.
Hope this helps.

https://jurisdictionary.com/you-know-what-justice-is/

https://jurisdictionary.com/overview/


https://jurisdictionary.com/two-kinds-of-government/


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Educational Purpose

Educational Purpose 

2024 New Jersey Revised Statutes Title 39 - Motor Vehicles and Traffic Regulation Se"Intersection" means the area embraced within the prolongation of the lateral curb lines or, if none, the lateral boundary lines of two or more highways which join one another at an angle, whether or not one such highway crosses another.ction 39:1-1 - Words and phrases defined.'

2024 New Jersey Revised Statutes Title 39 - Motor Vehicles and Traffic Regulation Section 39:1-1 - Words and phrases defined.' 39:1-1 Words and phrases defined. 39:1-1. As used in this subtitle, unless other meaning is clearly apparent from the language or context, or unless inconsistent with the manifest intention of the Legislature: "Alley" means a public highway wherein the roadway does not exceed 12 feet in width. "Authorized emergency vehicles" means vehicles of the fire department, police vehicles and such ambulances and other vehicles as are approved by the chief administrator when operated in response to an emergency call. "Autocycle" means a three-wheeled motorcycle designed to be controlled with a steering wheel and pedals in which the operator and passenger may ride in a completely or partially enclosed seating area that is equipped with a roll cage or roll hoops, safety seat belts for each occupant, and anti-lock brakes. "Automobile...

NJ Transit bus strikes, kills pedestrian. Another person seriously injured Koran Tajhai Dupree Baker, a 25-year-old Newark

  Another Life Lost to NJ Transit: When Will It End? Early Sunday morning, tragedy struck in Newark when an NJ Transit bus hit two pedestrians, leaving one dead and another seriously injured. According to the Essex County Prosecutor’s Office, the incident occurred at 12:18 a.m. on the 400 block of Springfield Avenue. Koran Tajhai Dupree Baker, a 25-year-old Newark resident, succumbed to his injuries at a local hospital. The second victim remains hospitalized, fighting to recover. Here we are in 2025, and NJ Transit buses continue to take lives under Governor Phil Murphy’s administration. How many more people must be injured or killed before real accountability is enforced? It’s time for action. A class action lawsuit needs to be filed against NJ Transit on behalf of all living victims and the families of those who have lost their lives due to reckless bus drivers. These drivers must be held accountable—this is not just negligence; these are murders on wheels . NJ Transit has ...