Educational Purpose

 There are state supreme court rulings and SCOTUS rulings. If the state court rulings set precedence and are not ruled on or addressed by the supreme Court of the US, then the state court rulings set precedence, unless the SCOTUS rulings override the state rulings. Someone please correct me if I am .

Good Morning, if a written decision in an Administrative Procedure with a state agency is completely missing everything I have verbally testified numerous times (clearly available in hours of audio recordings that they refuse to put in writing) should the Appeal committee listen to these audios?
Can they just ignore audios just because it’s not on paper?
If they try to NOT listen to the audio recordings how do I go about getting Appeal to listen and take that into account?

First and foremost,you must understand the Rules of your game!

Check the specific appeal rules/procedures.

Look at the agency's appeal notice, regulations, or state Administrative Procedure Act for how Evidence/record review works.

Wrong… If she’s already in a court case, and there is evidence that’s being overlooked then one of the remedies one of the most effective remedies is called a writ a mandamus… if they’re already violating procedure looking up more procedure isn’t gonna solve any problems!

Administrative Proceeding.
Different Rules.

You wouldn't bring a bowling ball to a baseball game,now would we?

Presentation is everything,Kent.

Don't be so quick to judge.

Rules are rules.
But, court orders can also be rules.
Check with your court’s clerk for a printout of “local administrative rules” and in particular any rules entered by the judge assigned to your case.
They need not be SCOTUS.
Study my courses.

Administrative cases almost always have appeal as the remedy and many times that is an administrative appeal before it goes outside the administrative jurisdiction to a state level court where the administrative appeal can be overturned.

The most effective tools after a judgment has been made are reconsideration and appeal. One just needs to check the rules of the administration under which the judgment is made to determine what next step is available.

This sounds similar to my Unemployment Insurance case where the employer appealed my entitlement to benefits. I appealed their appeal first in the agency’s court. They called it an appeal to the Board. Then when they also made things up and didn’t hear my arguments and continued to advocated for the employer, I next appealed to the Circuit Court in the County. When the Circuit Court claimed deference (something the court is not allowed to automatically do any more), I appealed to the Appellate Court of the state where I finally won.

So you have to use the audio recordings as your evidence in your appeals. You should pay to have the audio officially transcribed. Then use the transcription, line by line as your evidence that supports your arguments.

Then it would be helpful to cite the law and to make sure everyone understands it is a local statute at this point. I read the posting on your site, and there was no citation to either case law or a statute supporting your statement. You’re teaching us to be litigants, aren’t you?? 😉

AI can be used in many different ways in the generation of the papers. To have a law that states generally that someone must declare a certification of the AI’s assistance in the overall composition of the paper is like saying I have to certify that my computer helped in the composition of the paper.

It would really be helpful to see the verbiage of this statute and the enforcement behind it making it a law.
Thank you!

If you use AI in SOME jurisdictions, you must follow the administrative order to reveal same.
Just trying to help those who wish to know what's what.

Check your local administrative rules to avoid disappointments.
No need to argue with me about it.

I can’t find anything about the AUDIO files in their appeal process, I know if they had provided WRITTEN transcriptsTRANSCRIPTS, those should go into the Appeal process, so that’s why I asked.
The Appeal can’t go favorably because it would expose too many BAR members..

Thanks Nelda your answers help, I can see this happening here too, there’s steps to be taken next (state court won’t work until the final step in the administrative process which they’re not getting to so im in an seemingly endless loop of state employees wasting hours and hours and huge amounts of dollars to avoid what all the documents have shown from the start‼️ their first written decision was favorably to me and ever since then it’s lies and lies and all kinds of shenanigans

The biggest issue are BAR attorneys pretending to have the power and freedom to lie, make up “facts,” ex parte communication, and all kinds of things (Dr Graves has previously said not to file complaints with the BAR, yet, and I haven’t, yet…)

This thing will eventually go to some court..