Skip to main content

The Three Domaines Of Law

The Types Of Laws



@by: James-david::The government can only make law for its employees and the Elected office... prior to the Civil war Now since The Act of 1871 they have become like kings and forgot how we got here..


@FirstVerarchist:The Constitution is just a claim of ownership over us, which isn't valid

 @Black Letter Law:If the Constitution were “ownership,” rights wouldn’t exist against the government, courts couldn’t strike laws down, and officials wouldn’t be bound by oath. The entire structure proves the opposite: the government is subordinate to the people, not the other way around.

Calling it “ownership” isn’t a legal argument, it’s lazy, and it’s just refusing the social contract while still benefiting from it. The Constitution is not a claim of ownership over people. It’s a grant of limited power from the people to government. That’s explicit in the text and confirmed by the courts. Here is some case law to support the rebuttal. “We the People”, not the state, are the source of authority. Government only has powers delegated to it. Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 U.S. 419 (1793): “The people are the sovereigns here. Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886): The Constitution protects persons, not property of the state. Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1 (1957): Government has no power outside constitutional limits- ever.

@FirstVerarchist:To say the nation isn't claiming ownership over you when you're taxes at every exchange, forced to go to jury duty, forced to sign up in selective services, and forced to get approval for countless things, is not very truthful. The Constitution claims ownership over you, and then makes you excited because it limits that ownership, but does so in a way that makes you think it's giving you something that want already yours. You need to get honest.


@Mr E Nigma:yes that is true but most people don't understand it and it's complexity

in order to make the changes that people keep thinking of you need at least three quarters of the entire population of the United States to be willing to be on your side and petition to get rid of an amendment like the second amendment


@Mr E Nigma:as the person below me said literally the entire purpose of the 21st amendment was to completely get rid of the 18th amendment so it is actually possible but if we are going to start getting rid of amendment then it would also be possible to get rid of the Constitution upon which the amendment derive their power


@quantumloop:Did you forget the 21st amendment that repealed the 18th amendment. Literally getting rid of the amendment.


@Black Letter Law:You’re right. But precedence in process of law has is still in effect. Article 5 allows the governing body, the people, to repeal anything that contradicts anything after it. Prohibition was one of them. However, article 5 cannot prohibit amendment 2, due to precedence.

@Mr E Nigma:actually according to precedent they do have the authority to not only temporarily but possibly permanently shut down the second amendment as the 18th amendment dictated it was a Prohibition on even weapon and as such that means they do have the authority to temporarily or not even temporarily but almost permanently get rid of your right to a weapon as most States often do to criminals


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

New Jersey Rules Of Court

3:2-Contents of Complaints, Arrest Warrant and Summons 3:2-1-Contents of Complaint; Citizen Complaints for Indictable Offenses; Forwarding of Indictable Complaints to Prosecutor and Criminal Division Manager; Forwarding of Investigative Reports to Prosecutor You can read more of the Municipal Courts procedure that the Administrative Judge Law/Municipal Judge Law who is an Administrative Judge. 3:2-2-Summons A summons shall be made on a Complaint-Summons (CDR-1) form, a Uniform Traffic Ticket, a Special Form of Complaint and Summons, or such other form as may be approved by the Administrative Director of the Courts. The summons shall be directed to the person named in the complaint, requiring that person to appear before the court in which the complaint is made at a stated time and place, and shall indicate that there will be consequences for failure to appear at the scheduled first appearance. If the individual fails to appear at that first appearance, a notice shall issue advising the...
Post a Comment
Read more

NJ Transit bus strikes, kills pedestrian. Another person seriously injured Koran Tajhai Dupree Baker, a 25-year-old Newark

  Another Life Lost to NJ Transit: When Will It End? Early Sunday morning, tragedy struck in Newark when an NJ Transit bus hit two pedestrians, leaving one dead and another seriously injured. According to the Essex County Prosecutor’s Office, the incident occurred at 12:18 a.m. on the 400 block of Springfield Avenue. Koran Tajhai Dupree Baker, a 25-year-old Newark resident, succumbed to his injuries at a local hospital. The second victim remains hospitalized, fighting to recover. Here we are in 2025, and NJ Transit buses continue to take lives under Governor Phil Murphy’s administration. How many more people must be injured or killed before real accountability is enforced? It’s time for action. A class action lawsuit needs to be filed against NJ Transit on behalf of all living victims and the families of those who have lost their lives due to reckless bus drivers. These drivers must be held accountable—this is not just negligence; these are murders on wheels . NJ Transit has ...
Post a Comment
Read more
 "The federal statutes that force my opponent to comply with discovery are Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, 34, and 37. Rule 34 requires production within 30 days of a request. Rule 37 allows me to file a Motion to Compel if they fail to produce, and authorizes the Court to impose sanctions, award fees, strike their pleadings, or enter default judgment for willful non-compliance. Rule 37(e) also addresses spoliation of electronically stored information including body-worn camera footage and CAD records. In the District of New Jersey, Local Civil Rule 37.1 required me to complete a meet and confer before filing — which I completed on April 30, 2026." If you are trying to compel discovery and don't know what local rules and statutes govern compliance, you are wasting your time, and showing that you might not know what you are doing and aren't credible. This is akin to the tail wagging the dog or putting the cart before the horse. Sending a notice to opposing counsel achieves nothing...
Post a Comment
Read more