Skip to main content

Notice of Constitutional Boundaries, Oath of Office, and Legal Consequences for Unlawful Enforcement Actions Against Private People.pdf

Notice of Constitutional Boundaries, Oath of Office, and Legal Consequences for Unlawful Enforcement Actions Against Private People

I, Naomi Johnson, a private woman and non-corporate

 actor, hereby provide you with formal notice regarding

 the following facts and legal principles, supported by

 the United States Constitution, New Jersey

 Constitution, and binding Supreme Court precedent:

I. Supreme Law of the Land

Pursuant to Article VI, Clause 2 of the United States

 Constitution (Supremacy Clause), only laws enacted

in pursuance of the Constitution are valid and

 enforceable. Any statute, code, or regulation that

 contradicts constitutional rights is null and void.

“All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.” – Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)

II. Legal Doctrine – No Duty to Obey

 Unconstitutional Statutes

According to:

  • 16 Am. Jur. 2d, Constitutional Law §§ 203 & 256

  • 16 C.J.S. Constitutional Law § 101

“An unconstitutional statute, whether federal or state, is not a law. It imposes no duties, confers no rights, and justifies no acts

performed under it.” “No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional
law.”

Thus, no public official has lawful authority to impose or

 enforce statutes (such as Title 39 traffic codes) upon

 private, non-commercial individuals traveling without

 contract, without commercial purpose, and without

 violation of public peace or safety.

III. Oath of Office and Criminal Liability

All public officials, including law enforcement officers,

 are bound by Title 5 U.S.C. § 3331 to uphold the

 Constitution. Failure to do so may result in liability under:

 Constitution. Failure to do so may result in liability under:

  • 18 U.S.C. § 241 – Conspiracy Against Rights

  • 18 U.S.C. § 242 – Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law

Your sworn oath does not authorize enforcement of

 unconstitutional policies, including but not limited to

 citations, arrests, or towing of private property based on

revenue-driven or commercial codes.

IV. Misapplication of Commercial Codes to Private Individuals

Traffic citations (#001733 and #003734) issued against

 me—Naomi Johnson—are a misapplication of

commercial statutes (N.J.S.A. Title 39). These codes

 govern drivers engaged in commerce and public safety.

I was not involved in any commercial activity, nor was

there was no injured party.



Enforcement of these tickets constitutes:

  • Unlawful conversion of private rights to

  •  commercial jurisdiction,

  • Violation of the Right to Travel,

  • Violation of Due Process and Equal

  •  Protection under the 14th Amendment,

  • And a breach of your oath to both the U.S.

  •  Constitution and New Jersey Constitution.

V. Demand for Remedy

I hereby give Notice and Demand for the following:

  1. Immediate Dismissal of any and all citations

  2.  issued under traffic tickets #001733 and #003734.

  3. Release and return of any private property

  4.  unlawfully towed or held.

  5. Written acknowledgment that my constitutional

  6.  rights remain intact and will not be infringed.

  7. That bodycam footage related to the incident involving Sgt. Anthony D. Mazza is preserved and not destroyed or altered under any circumstance.

VI. Notice of Commercial and Criminal Liability

You are now on notice. If you continue to act outside

 your lawful authority, under color of law, or in conflict

 with your constitutional oath, you may be held:

  • Individually liable in your private capacity,

  • Subject to federal tort claims,

  • Reported to federal authorities,

  • And named in civil rights litigation under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

Let this notice serve as a good-faith warning and

 opportunity to correct all unconstitutional actions to

 avoid further legal and commercial liability.

Affirmation

I affirm under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, that the above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.

Executed on this ___ day of ___________, 2025.


By:


Naomi Johnson


 Private Woman, Injured Party, Claimant


Notice of Constitutional Boundaries, Oath of Office, and Legal Consequences for Unlawful Enforcement Actions Against Private People.pdf






Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

New Jersey Rules Of Court

3:2-Contents of Complaints, Arrest Warrant and Summons 3:2-1-Contents of Complaint; Citizen Complaints for Indictable Offenses; Forwarding of Indictable Complaints to Prosecutor and Criminal Division Manager; Forwarding of Investigative Reports to Prosecutor You can read more of the Municipal Courts procedure that the Administrative Judge Law/Municipal Judge Law who is an Administrative Judge. 3:2-2-Summons A summons shall be made on a Complaint-Summons (CDR-1) form, a Uniform Traffic Ticket, a Special Form of Complaint and Summons, or such other form as may be approved by the Administrative Director of the Courts. The summons shall be directed to the person named in the complaint, requiring that person to appear before the court in which the complaint is made at a stated time and place, and shall indicate that there will be consequences for failure to appear at the scheduled first appearance. If the individual fails to appear at that first appearance, a notice shall issue advising the...
Post a Comment
Read more

NJ Transit bus strikes, kills pedestrian. Another person seriously injured Koran Tajhai Dupree Baker, a 25-year-old Newark

  Another Life Lost to NJ Transit: When Will It End? Early Sunday morning, tragedy struck in Newark when an NJ Transit bus hit two pedestrians, leaving one dead and another seriously injured. According to the Essex County Prosecutor’s Office, the incident occurred at 12:18 a.m. on the 400 block of Springfield Avenue. Koran Tajhai Dupree Baker, a 25-year-old Newark resident, succumbed to his injuries at a local hospital. The second victim remains hospitalized, fighting to recover. Here we are in 2025, and NJ Transit buses continue to take lives under Governor Phil Murphy’s administration. How many more people must be injured or killed before real accountability is enforced? It’s time for action. A class action lawsuit needs to be filed against NJ Transit on behalf of all living victims and the families of those who have lost their lives due to reckless bus drivers. These drivers must be held accountable—this is not just negligence; these are murders on wheels . NJ Transit has ...
Post a Comment
Read more
 "The federal statutes that force my opponent to comply with discovery are Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, 34, and 37. Rule 34 requires production within 30 days of a request. Rule 37 allows me to file a Motion to Compel if they fail to produce, and authorizes the Court to impose sanctions, award fees, strike their pleadings, or enter default judgment for willful non-compliance. Rule 37(e) also addresses spoliation of electronically stored information including body-worn camera footage and CAD records. In the District of New Jersey, Local Civil Rule 37.1 required me to complete a meet and confer before filing — which I completed on April 30, 2026." If you are trying to compel discovery and don't know what local rules and statutes govern compliance, you are wasting your time, and showing that you might not know what you are doing and aren't credible. This is akin to the tail wagging the dog or putting the cart before the horse. Sending a notice to opposing counsel achieves nothing...
Post a Comment
Read more