Skip to main content

Constitutional Law, U.S. Supreme Court Cases, Presumption & Burden, Commercial/UCC Law, ADA / Disability Law and Prepare a Federal Claim / Civil Rights Suit:

 Constitutional Law, U.S. Supreme Court Cases, Presumption & Burden, Commercial/UCC Law, ADA / Disability Law and Prepare a Federal Claim / Civil Rights Suit

Sample Line to Include in Your Letter:

“This court has acted in contradiction to its own procedures, issuing a warrant while simultaneously stating that no appearance was required. This contradiction demonstrates coercion, procedural abuse, and failure to establish valid jurisdiction under Article III judicial power. The judge’s demand for payment without due process violates Public Law 73-10, Article I Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution, and denies my unalienable rights under natural and common law.”

Constitutional Law:

  • U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 10, Clause 1: No state shall pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts or make anything but gold/silver legal tender. (Ref: Public Law 73-10 / HJR 192, 1933)

  • Fourth Amendment – Protection against unreasonable searches, seizures, and warrants issued without probable cause.

  • Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments – Due process of law.

  • Sixth Amendment – Right to face accuser and be informed of the nature and cause of accusation.

U.S. Supreme Court Cases:

  • Bond v. United States, 564 U.S. 211 (2011): Individuals have standing to challenge government actions violating constitutional rights.

  • Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) – Rights must be clearly communicated, and the state must respect procedural fairness.

  • Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. 264 (1821) – The court must prove jurisdiction; it cannot be presumed.

  • Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 (1906) – Sovereign individuals are not required to waive their rights or provide evidence against themselves unless under proper jurisdiction.

Presumption & Burden:

  • Federal Rules of Evidence Rule 301 – The party asserting a presumption (i.e., jurisdiction) bears the burden of rebutting contrary evidence. Your affidavits rebut their presumptions — the court must now prove jurisdiction.

Commercial/UCC Law:

  • UCC § 1-103: The code must be supplemented by principles of law and equity including natural law, common law, and constitutional law.

  • UCC § 3-501: Presentment must be made to the party — you never consented to the ticket's terms or payment contract.

ADA / Disability Law:

  • 42 U.S.C. § 12132 – Public entities must provide accommodations to qualified individuals with disabilities.

  • 28 C.F.R. § 35.130 – Discrimination includes failing to provide reasonable accommodations (virtual appearance, etc.).

STRATEGY – YOUR NEXT STEPS:

1. Respond to Judge's Email (in writing):

Include the following in your response:

  • Point out the contradiction between “not needing to appear” vs. a warrant being issued.

  • Reassert that you responded in writing via certified mail — a valid legal method.

  • Demand proof of jurisdiction (subject matter, personal, territorial).

  • Reaffirm you never consented to the administrative procedure.

  • Notify that you are disabled and request an ADA-compliant virtual appearance, without waiving jurisdictional objections.

2. Prepare a Federal Claim / Civil Rights Suit:

Include the judge’s contradictions, threats, procedural violations, disability neglect, and jurisdictional failure. Attach:

  • Your certified mail receipts.

  • Affidavit of Facts.

  • Copies of all court notices.

  • This judge's email.

  • Case law and authorities (from above).

3. File a Judicial Complaint:

Send to:

  • Chief Justice of NJ Supreme Court

  • Administrative Office of NJ Courts

  • U.S. DOJ – Civil Rights Division

  • IRS – if claiming improper bonding or financial fraud

  • ADA Coordinator for NJ Judiciary

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Educational Purpose

Educational Purpose 

2024 New Jersey Revised Statutes Title 39 - Motor Vehicles and Traffic Regulation Se"Intersection" means the area embraced within the prolongation of the lateral curb lines or, if none, the lateral boundary lines of two or more highways which join one another at an angle, whether or not one such highway crosses another.ction 39:1-1 - Words and phrases defined.'

2024 New Jersey Revised Statutes Title 39 - Motor Vehicles and Traffic Regulation Section 39:1-1 - Words and phrases defined.' 39:1-1 Words and phrases defined. 39:1-1. As used in this subtitle, unless other meaning is clearly apparent from the language or context, or unless inconsistent with the manifest intention of the Legislature: "Alley" means a public highway wherein the roadway does not exceed 12 feet in width. "Authorized emergency vehicles" means vehicles of the fire department, police vehicles and such ambulances and other vehicles as are approved by the chief administrator when operated in response to an emergency call. "Autocycle" means a three-wheeled motorcycle designed to be controlled with a steering wheel and pedals in which the operator and passenger may ride in a completely or partially enclosed seating area that is equipped with a roll cage or roll hoops, safety seat belts for each occupant, and anti-lock brakes. "Automobile...

NJ Transit bus strikes, kills pedestrian. Another person seriously injured Koran Tajhai Dupree Baker, a 25-year-old Newark

  Another Life Lost to NJ Transit: When Will It End? Early Sunday morning, tragedy struck in Newark when an NJ Transit bus hit two pedestrians, leaving one dead and another seriously injured. According to the Essex County Prosecutor’s Office, the incident occurred at 12:18 a.m. on the 400 block of Springfield Avenue. Koran Tajhai Dupree Baker, a 25-year-old Newark resident, succumbed to his injuries at a local hospital. The second victim remains hospitalized, fighting to recover. Here we are in 2025, and NJ Transit buses continue to take lives under Governor Phil Murphy’s administration. How many more people must be injured or killed before real accountability is enforced? It’s time for action. A class action lawsuit needs to be filed against NJ Transit on behalf of all living victims and the families of those who have lost their lives due to reckless bus drivers. These drivers must be held accountable—this is not just negligence; these are murders on wheels . NJ Transit has ...