Skip to main content

Constitutional Law, U.S. Supreme Court Cases, Presumption & Burden, Commercial/UCC Law, ADA / Disability Law and Prepare a Federal Claim / Civil Rights Suit:

 Constitutional Law, U.S. Supreme Court Cases, Presumption & Burden, Commercial/UCC Law, ADA / Disability Law and Prepare a Federal Claim / Civil Rights Suit

Sample Line to Include in Your Letter:

“This court has acted in contradiction to its own procedures, issuing a warrant while simultaneously stating that no appearance was required. This contradiction demonstrates coercion, procedural abuse, and failure to establish valid jurisdiction under Article III judicial power. The judge’s demand for payment without due process violates Public Law 73-10, Article I Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution, and denies my unalienable rights under natural and common law.”

Constitutional Law:

  • U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 10, Clause 1: No state shall pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts or make anything but gold/silver legal tender. (Ref: Public Law 73-10 / HJR 192, 1933)

  • Fourth Amendment – Protection against unreasonable searches, seizures, and warrants issued without probable cause.

  • Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments – Due process of law.

  • Sixth Amendment – Right to face accuser and be informed of the nature and cause of accusation.

U.S. Supreme Court Cases:

  • Bond v. United States, 564 U.S. 211 (2011): Individuals have standing to challenge government actions violating constitutional rights.

  • Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) – Rights must be clearly communicated, and the state must respect procedural fairness.

  • Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. 264 (1821) – The court must prove jurisdiction; it cannot be presumed.

  • Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 (1906) – Sovereign individuals are not required to waive their rights or provide evidence against themselves unless under proper jurisdiction.

Presumption & Burden:

  • Federal Rules of Evidence Rule 301 – The party asserting a presumption (i.e., jurisdiction) bears the burden of rebutting contrary evidence. Your affidavits rebut their presumptions — the court must now prove jurisdiction.

Commercial/UCC Law:

  • UCC § 1-103: The code must be supplemented by principles of law and equity including natural law, common law, and constitutional law.

  • UCC § 3-501: Presentment must be made to the party — you never consented to the ticket's terms or payment contract.

ADA / Disability Law:

  • 42 U.S.C. § 12132 – Public entities must provide accommodations to qualified individuals with disabilities.

  • 28 C.F.R. § 35.130 – Discrimination includes failing to provide reasonable accommodations (virtual appearance, etc.).

STRATEGY – YOUR NEXT STEPS:

1. Respond to Judge's Email (in writing):

Include the following in your response:

  • Point out the contradiction between “not needing to appear” vs. a warrant being issued.

  • Reassert that you responded in writing via certified mail — a valid legal method.

  • Demand proof of jurisdiction (subject matter, personal, territorial).

  • Reaffirm you never consented to the administrative procedure.

  • Notify that you are disabled and request an ADA-compliant virtual appearance, without waiving jurisdictional objections.

2. Prepare a Federal Claim / Civil Rights Suit:

Include the judge’s contradictions, threats, procedural violations, disability neglect, and jurisdictional failure. Attach:

  • Your certified mail receipts.

  • Affidavit of Facts.

  • Copies of all court notices.

  • This judge's email.

  • Case law and authorities (from above).

3. File a Judicial Complaint:

Send to:

  • Chief Justice of NJ Supreme Court

  • Administrative Office of NJ Courts

  • U.S. DOJ – Civil Rights Division

  • IRS – if claiming improper bonding or financial fraud

  • ADA Coordinator for NJ Judiciary

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

New Jersey Rules Of Court

3:2-Contents of Complaints, Arrest Warrant and Summons 3:2-1-Contents of Complaint; Citizen Complaints for Indictable Offenses; Forwarding of Indictable Complaints to Prosecutor and Criminal Division Manager; Forwarding of Investigative Reports to Prosecutor You can read more of the Municipal Courts procedure that the Administrative Judge Law/Municipal Judge Law who is an Administrative Judge. 3:2-2-Summons A summons shall be made on a Complaint-Summons (CDR-1) form, a Uniform Traffic Ticket, a Special Form of Complaint and Summons, or such other form as may be approved by the Administrative Director of the Courts. The summons shall be directed to the person named in the complaint, requiring that person to appear before the court in which the complaint is made at a stated time and place, and shall indicate that there will be consequences for failure to appear at the scheduled first appearance. If the individual fails to appear at that first appearance, a notice shall issue advising the...
Post a Comment
Read more

NJ Transit bus strikes, kills pedestrian. Another person seriously injured Koran Tajhai Dupree Baker, a 25-year-old Newark

  Another Life Lost to NJ Transit: When Will It End? Early Sunday morning, tragedy struck in Newark when an NJ Transit bus hit two pedestrians, leaving one dead and another seriously injured. According to the Essex County Prosecutor’s Office, the incident occurred at 12:18 a.m. on the 400 block of Springfield Avenue. Koran Tajhai Dupree Baker, a 25-year-old Newark resident, succumbed to his injuries at a local hospital. The second victim remains hospitalized, fighting to recover. Here we are in 2025, and NJ Transit buses continue to take lives under Governor Phil Murphy’s administration. How many more people must be injured or killed before real accountability is enforced? It’s time for action. A class action lawsuit needs to be filed against NJ Transit on behalf of all living victims and the families of those who have lost their lives due to reckless bus drivers. These drivers must be held accountable—this is not just negligence; these are murders on wheels . NJ Transit has ...
Post a Comment
Read more
 "The federal statutes that force my opponent to comply with discovery are Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, 34, and 37. Rule 34 requires production within 30 days of a request. Rule 37 allows me to file a Motion to Compel if they fail to produce, and authorizes the Court to impose sanctions, award fees, strike their pleadings, or enter default judgment for willful non-compliance. Rule 37(e) also addresses spoliation of electronically stored information including body-worn camera footage and CAD records. In the District of New Jersey, Local Civil Rule 37.1 required me to complete a meet and confer before filing — which I completed on April 30, 2026." If you are trying to compel discovery and don't know what local rules and statutes govern compliance, you are wasting your time, and showing that you might not know what you are doing and aren't credible. This is akin to the tail wagging the dog or putting the cart before the horse. Sending a notice to opposing counsel achieves nothing...
Post a Comment
Read more