Skip to main content

Use of body worn camera by law enforcement officers

 

2024 New Jersey Revised Statutes
Title 40A - Municipalities and Counties
Section 40A:14-118.3 - Use of body worn camera by law enforcement officers.


Section 40A:14-118.3 - Use of body worn camera by law enforcement officers. This media-neutral citation is based on the American Association of Law Libraries Universal Citation Guide and is not necessarily the official citation.40A:14-118.3 Use of body worn camera by law enforcement officers.

1. a. Notwithstanding the provisions of any other law to the contrary and subject to the limit of funds appropriated or otherwise made available for this purpose, every uniformed State, county, and municipal patrol law enforcement officer shall wear a body worn camera that electronically records audio and video while acting in the performance of the officer's official duties, except:

(1) while engaging in an undercover assignment;

(2) when assigned to non-uniformed duties;

(3) while serving in an administrative position within the department;

(4) while meeting with a confidential informant;

(5) while engaging in union representation of a member of the collective bargaining group;

(6) when directed by the Chief or a superior officer for a lawful purpose;

(7) a detective or investigator of a county prosecutor's office or Division of Criminal Justice when authorized by the County Prosecutor or Attorney General; or

(8) as may be otherwise provided in accordance with guidelines or directives promulgated by the Attorney General.

b. In addition to funding provided through the annual appropriations act, the body worn cameras required by subsection a. of this section may be funded by forfeiture funds collected pursuant to N.J.S.2C:64-6, in an amount to be determined by the Attorney General , or any other source of funding made available for this purpose, including but not limited to federal grants.

c. For the purposes of this section, "body worn camera" means a mobile video recording system worn by a law enforcement officer.


The ruling was one of several the state's top court has issued on body-worn cameras since state lawmakers, in the wake of George Floyd's death at the hands of Minneapolis police in 2020, passed a law requiring all law enforcement officers in New Jersey to wear them to document their encounters with the public.


The ruling was one of several the state’s top court has issued on body-worn cameras since state lawmakers, in the wake of George Floyd’s death at the hands of Minneapolis police in 2020, passed a law requiring all law enforcement officers in New Jersey to wear them to document their encounters with the public.


Bill S4261

Session 2022 - 2023

SENATE, No. 4261

STATE OF NEW JERSEY

220th LEGISLATURE

 

INTRODUCED DECEMBER 28, 2023

 


 

Sponsored by:

Senator  ANTHONY M. BUCCO

District 25 (Morris and Somerset)

 

 

 

 

SYNOPSIS

     Prohibits disclosure of body worn camera recordings under certain circumstances.

 

CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT

     As introduced.

  


An Act concerning invasion of privacy and supplementing Title 2A of the Revised Statutes.

 

     Be It Enacted by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:

 

     1.    a. A person who has obtained a body worn camera recording pursuant to P.L.1963, c.73 (C.47:1A-1 et seq.), commonly known as the open public records act, and who is not a subject of the body worn camera recording shall not disclose the recording without the prior written consent of each subject of the body worn camera recording, unless the disclosure is for a legitimate public health or safety purpose or a compelling public interest.

     b.    A person who knowingly violates the provisions of subsection a. of this section shall be guilty of a disorderly persons offense. 

     c.     In addition to any other right of action or recovery otherwise available under the laws of this State, a person who knowingly violates the provisions of subsection a. of this section shall be liable to a subject of the body worn camera recording, who may bring a civil action in the Superior Court.

     The court may award:

     (1) actual damages, but not less than liquidated damages computed at the rate of $1,000 for each violation of this section;

     (2) punitive damages upon proof of willful or reckless disregard of the law;

     (3) reasonable attorney’s fees and other litigation costs reasonably incurred; and

     (4) other preliminary and equitable relief as the court determines to be appropriate.

     d.    A conviction for a disorderly persons offense pursuant to subsection b. of this section shall not be a prerequisite for a civil action brought pursuant to subsection c. of this section.

     e.     As used in this section:

     “Body worn camera” means a mobile audio and video recording system worn by a law enforcement officer.

     “Disclose” means to sell, manufacture, give, provide, lend, mail, deliver, transfer, publish, post, distribute, circulate, disseminate, present, exhibit, advertise, offer, share, or make available through the Internet or by any other means, whether or not for pecuniary gain.

     “Law enforcement officer” means a person whose public duties include the power to act as an officer for the detection, apprehension, arrest, and conviction of offenders against the laws of this State. 

     "Subject of the body worn camera recording" means suspect, victim, detainee, conversant, injured party, or other similarly situated person who appears on the body worn camera recording, and shall not include a person who only incidentally appears on the recording.

 

     2.    This act shall take effect immediately.

 

 

STATEMENT

 

     This bill prohibits the disclosure of body worn camera recordings obtained pursuant to the State’s open public records law under certain circumstances.

     It has come to the sponsor’s attention that bad actors have been taking advantage of the State’s open public records law in order to exploit on social media young women who have been recorded on body worn cameras during law enforcement encounters.  It is the sponsor’s intent to prevent such exploitation without limiting legitimate access to public records by the press or others. 

     Under the provisions of this bill, a person who has obtained a body worn camera recording pursuant to the open public records act and who is not a subject of the body worn camera recording is prohibited from disclosing the recording without the prior written consent of each subject of the body worn camera recording, unless the disclosure is for a legitimate public health or safety purpose or a compelling public interest.

     A person who knowingly violates this provision is guilty of a disorderly persons offense.  In addition to any other right of action or recovery available under the laws of this State, a person who knowingly violates this provision is also liable to a subject of the body worn camera recording, who may bring an action in Superior Court.  The court may award: 1) actual damages, but not less than liquidated damages computed at the rate of $1,000 for each violation; 2) punitive damages upon proof of willful or reckless disregard of the law; 3) reasonable attorney’s fees and other litigation costs reasonably incurred; and 4) any other preliminary and equitable relief as the court determines to be appropriate.

     Under the bill, “body worn camera” is defined as a mobile audio and video recording system worn by a law enforcement officer.  The bill defines “subject of the body worn camera recording” as a suspect, victim, detainee, conversant, injured party, or other similarly situated person who appears on the body worn camera recording and does not include a person who only incidentally appears on the recording.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Educational Purpose

Educational Purpose 

2024 New Jersey Revised Statutes Title 39 - Motor Vehicles and Traffic Regulation Se"Intersection" means the area embraced within the prolongation of the lateral curb lines or, if none, the lateral boundary lines of two or more highways which join one another at an angle, whether or not one such highway crosses another.ction 39:1-1 - Words and phrases defined.'

2024 New Jersey Revised Statutes Title 39 - Motor Vehicles and Traffic Regulation Section 39:1-1 - Words and phrases defined.' 39:1-1 Words and phrases defined. 39:1-1. As used in this subtitle, unless other meaning is clearly apparent from the language or context, or unless inconsistent with the manifest intention of the Legislature: "Alley" means a public highway wherein the roadway does not exceed 12 feet in width. "Authorized emergency vehicles" means vehicles of the fire department, police vehicles and such ambulances and other vehicles as are approved by the chief administrator when operated in response to an emergency call. "Autocycle" means a three-wheeled motorcycle designed to be controlled with a steering wheel and pedals in which the operator and passenger may ride in a completely or partially enclosed seating area that is equipped with a roll cage or roll hoops, safety seat belts for each occupant, and anti-lock brakes. "Automobile...

NJ Transit bus strikes, kills pedestrian. Another person seriously injured Koran Tajhai Dupree Baker, a 25-year-old Newark

  Another Life Lost to NJ Transit: When Will It End? Early Sunday morning, tragedy struck in Newark when an NJ Transit bus hit two pedestrians, leaving one dead and another seriously injured. According to the Essex County Prosecutor’s Office, the incident occurred at 12:18 a.m. on the 400 block of Springfield Avenue. Koran Tajhai Dupree Baker, a 25-year-old Newark resident, succumbed to his injuries at a local hospital. The second victim remains hospitalized, fighting to recover. Here we are in 2025, and NJ Transit buses continue to take lives under Governor Phil Murphy’s administration. How many more people must be injured or killed before real accountability is enforced? It’s time for action. A class action lawsuit needs to be filed against NJ Transit on behalf of all living victims and the families of those who have lost their lives due to reckless bus drivers. These drivers must be held accountable—this is not just negligence; these are murders on wheels . NJ Transit has ...