Skip to main content

What Is The Purpose Of New Jersey Motor Vehicle Commission

V What Is The Purpose Of New Jersey Motor Vehicle Commission?

Based on my research, the New Jersey Motor Vehicle Commission’s mission statement, along with the New Jersey Highway Safety initiative, claims to prioritize citizen safety. However, after analyzing the information on both websites, I have concluded that their focus is not entirely on public safety—it is largely about generating revenue.

How does issuing a parking ticket contribute to citizen safety?

How does penalizing individuals for having an unregistered vehicle—without any direct harm—enhance public safety?

How does issuing a traffic citation for failing to make a complete stop at a stop sign, when no accident or injury occurred, genuinely serve public safety?

According to the Constitution, a person must suffer an injury for a police officer to justifiably exercise their authority. Yet, lower courts continue to pressure individuals into paying traffic citations that did not result in injury, death, or property damage. This practice amounts to extorting money from "We the People."

Public servants, including police officers, judges, prosecutors, and other government officials, are funded by taxpayer dollars. They have a fiduciary duty to serve the people—the rightful trustees of the United States of America. Instead of upholding justice, they have become beneficiaries of a system that prioritizes revenue collection over true public safety. 


MVC

The MVC turned police officers who sworn under oath to uphold New Jersey State Constitution and United State Constitution and serve the people as public officials. MVC  and legislative do not care about the oath so they turn police officers to revenue police and policy police. According to the Preamble is states that We The People are govern the public official and public servant. As time continue in this world the role slow illegal turned. The police are acting like the people have to listen to them and they are breaking their constitutional oath. 

The mission of the MVC is to promote motor vehicle safety for our citizens by delivering secure, effective and professional motor vehicle services, and to achieve public trust and confidence in the quality and integrity of those services. Mission and Vision MVC


Motor Vehicle Commission

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/10929/186

The Commission traces its origin to 1906, when the Department of Motor Vehicle Registration and Regulation was established in connection with the Department of State. The Department become an independent entity in 1926 and remained so until 1948, when it was reorganized into the Division of Motor Vehicles within the Department of Law and Public Safety. The Division was moved under the Department of Transportation in 1995. In 2003, The Division was abolished and replaced with the New Jersey Motor Vehicle Commission, an entity in but not of the Department of Transportation.

The mission of the MVC is to promote motor vehicle safety for our citizens by delivering secure, effective and professional motor vehicle services, and to achieve public trust and confidence in the quality and integrity of those services.

Authorizing law(s) and reorganization plans: Chapter 113 of the Laws of 1906; Chapter 147 of the Laws of 1926; Chapter 439 of the Laws of 1948; Reorganization Plan 002-1995; Chapter 14 of the Laws of 2003

Division of Highway Traffic Safety About the Division

The mission of the Division of Highway Traffic Safety is the Safe Passage of all roadway users in New Jersey as we move toward zero fatalities. To achieve our mission, the Division promotes statewide traffic safety programs through education, engineering and enforcement activities.

The bulk of the Division’s funding comes from the Federal Government, through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The funding received by the Division is used to undertake state-wide traffic safety programs and is also dispersed to municipal, county, state government and law enforcement agencies, as well as non-profit organizations in the form of traffic safety grants.

The Director is appointed by the Governor and also serves as the Governor’s Representative for highway safety.

Traffic safety priority areas that the Division attempts to address include:

Occupant Protection:
Issues relating to the use of seat belts and child safety seats.

Impaired Driving:
Efforts to reduce driving while impaired by drugs or alcohol.

Pedestrian/Bicycle Safety:
Programs designed to reduce crashes involving pedestrians or bicycles.

Diversity Programs:
Bringing the traffic safety message to the state’s diverse populations.

Comprehensive Traffic Safety Programs:
County-wide programs that address specific traffic safety issues in a particular county.

Distracted Driving:
Educating motorists about the dangers of distractions such as talking on a cell phone or sending text messages while driving.

Aggressive Driving:
Reducing dangerous driving practices including speeding, excessive lane changes, tailgating and gesturing.

Young Drivers:
Raise awareness among young drivers and passengers of the dangers of impaired driving, speeding and not wearing seat belts.

Older Drivers:
Promote programs directed towards reducing traffic-related injuries and fatalities among older people.

Emergency Medical Services:
Ensure persons incurring traffic related injuries receive prompt emergency medical care.

Traffic Records:
Provide a complete and useful records system at the state and local level.

Work Zone Safety:
Develop and implement systems and procedures for carrying out roadway construction and operations in a safe manner.

Motorcycle Safety:
Promote motorcycle safety by addressing the use of helmets, impaired riding, rider training and motorist awareness.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New Jersey Rules Of Court

3:2-Contents of Complaints, Arrest Warrant and Summons 3:2-1-Contents of Complaint; Citizen Complaints for Indictable Offenses; Forwarding of Indictable Complaints to Prosecutor and Criminal Division Manager; Forwarding of Investigative Reports to Prosecutor You can read more of the Municipal Courts procedure that the Administrative Judge Law/Municipal Judge Law who is an Administrative Judge. 3:2-2-Summons A summons shall be made on a Complaint-Summons (CDR-1) form, a Uniform Traffic Ticket, a Special Form of Complaint and Summons, or such other form as may be approved by the Administrative Director of the Courts. The summons shall be directed to the person named in the complaint, requiring that person to appear before the court in which the complaint is made at a stated time and place, and shall indicate that there will be consequences for failure to appear at the scheduled first appearance. If the individual fails to appear at that first appearance, a notice shall issue advising the...

NJ Transit bus strikes, kills pedestrian. Another person seriously injured Koran Tajhai Dupree Baker, a 25-year-old Newark

  Another Life Lost to NJ Transit: When Will It End? Early Sunday morning, tragedy struck in Newark when an NJ Transit bus hit two pedestrians, leaving one dead and another seriously injured. According to the Essex County Prosecutor’s Office, the incident occurred at 12:18 a.m. on the 400 block of Springfield Avenue. Koran Tajhai Dupree Baker, a 25-year-old Newark resident, succumbed to his injuries at a local hospital. The second victim remains hospitalized, fighting to recover. Here we are in 2025, and NJ Transit buses continue to take lives under Governor Phil Murphy’s administration. How many more people must be injured or killed before real accountability is enforced? It’s time for action. A class action lawsuit needs to be filed against NJ Transit on behalf of all living victims and the families of those who have lost their lives due to reckless bus drivers. These drivers must be held accountable—this is not just negligence; these are murders on wheels . NJ Transit has ...
 "The federal statutes that force my opponent to comply with discovery are Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, 34, and 37. Rule 34 requires production within 30 days of a request. Rule 37 allows me to file a Motion to Compel if they fail to produce, and authorizes the Court to impose sanctions, award fees, strike their pleadings, or enter default judgment for willful non-compliance. Rule 37(e) also addresses spoliation of electronically stored information including body-worn camera footage and CAD records. In the District of New Jersey, Local Civil Rule 37.1 required me to complete a meet and confer before filing — which I completed on April 30, 2026." If you are trying to compel discovery and don't know what local rules and statutes govern compliance, you are wasting your time, and showing that you might not know what you are doing and aren't credible. This is akin to the tail wagging the dog or putting the cart before the horse. Sending a notice to opposing counsel achieves nothing...