Skip to main content

New Jersey Speed Limits Procedures

 New Jersey Speed Limits Procedures

Speed limits in New Jersey are determined by a combination of state law, engineering considerations, and politics. When changes to these limits are proposed, they often encounter resistance similar to the NIMBY (Not In My Backyard) phenomenon well-known to New Jersey residents.

The foundation for setting speed limits lies in state law, which establishes maximum limits such as 25 mph in school zones, business, and residential areas, 35 mph in specific low-density districts, and 55 mph or 65 mph on state highways and interstates, with 50 mph on all other roads.

However, these "statutory limits" can be adjusted based on engineering studies, which follow federal guidelines. These studies take into account the flow of traffic, crash data, road layout, nearby developments, parking conditions, and pedestrian traffic.

Former DOT employee Bartlett, now a project manager at Bordentown-based MBO Engineering LLC, noted that requests for speed limit reductions were far more common than requests for increases. Nevertheless, these requests often didn't align with the findings of engineering studies. In fact, at the DOT, nearly all requests were to lower speed limits, and almost all were denied.

However, the situation changed in 2008 when the state delegated the authority to reevaluate local speed limits to municipalities and counties, retaining jurisdiction over state roads. Speed limit adjustments frequently follow accidents or arise from concerns about speeding drivers, and they can serve both safety and political goals.

For instance, in one case, concerned neighbors advocated for a 10 mph reduction in the speed limit and secured support from the township council. However, their proposal still awaited input from the county engineering department and a decision from the freeholder board, which has jurisdiction over county roads. In contrast, the neighboring town of Bogota already had a 25 mph speed limit on River Road.

The diverse approaches to setting speed limits in New Jersey result in sharp disagreements. Some, like Sen. Declan O'Scanlon, advocate for "fact-based" speed limits that consider how fast people typically drive on limited-access highways, adjusting speed limits based on the 85th percentile speed. This approach may lead to higher speed limits on many highways but aims to reduce speed discrepancies and, consequently, accidents.

However, this approach faces opposition, with traffic safety consultant Pam Fischer and others arguing that existing speed limits are set for safety reasons. Fischer emphasizes the need to combat speeding, which remains a top cause of road fatalities in New Jersey, alongside alcohol and seat belt non-compliance.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New Jersey Rules Of Court

3:2-Contents of Complaints, Arrest Warrant and Summons 3:2-1-Contents of Complaint; Citizen Complaints for Indictable Offenses; Forwarding of Indictable Complaints to Prosecutor and Criminal Division Manager; Forwarding of Investigative Reports to Prosecutor You can read more of the Municipal Courts procedure that the Administrative Judge Law/Municipal Judge Law who is an Administrative Judge. 3:2-2-Summons A summons shall be made on a Complaint-Summons (CDR-1) form, a Uniform Traffic Ticket, a Special Form of Complaint and Summons, or such other form as may be approved by the Administrative Director of the Courts. The summons shall be directed to the person named in the complaint, requiring that person to appear before the court in which the complaint is made at a stated time and place, and shall indicate that there will be consequences for failure to appear at the scheduled first appearance. If the individual fails to appear at that first appearance, a notice shall issue advising the...

NJ Transit bus strikes, kills pedestrian. Another person seriously injured Koran Tajhai Dupree Baker, a 25-year-old Newark

  Another Life Lost to NJ Transit: When Will It End? Early Sunday morning, tragedy struck in Newark when an NJ Transit bus hit two pedestrians, leaving one dead and another seriously injured. According to the Essex County Prosecutor’s Office, the incident occurred at 12:18 a.m. on the 400 block of Springfield Avenue. Koran Tajhai Dupree Baker, a 25-year-old Newark resident, succumbed to his injuries at a local hospital. The second victim remains hospitalized, fighting to recover. Here we are in 2025, and NJ Transit buses continue to take lives under Governor Phil Murphy’s administration. How many more people must be injured or killed before real accountability is enforced? It’s time for action. A class action lawsuit needs to be filed against NJ Transit on behalf of all living victims and the families of those who have lost their lives due to reckless bus drivers. These drivers must be held accountable—this is not just negligence; these are murders on wheels . NJ Transit has ...
 "The federal statutes that force my opponent to comply with discovery are Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, 34, and 37. Rule 34 requires production within 30 days of a request. Rule 37 allows me to file a Motion to Compel if they fail to produce, and authorizes the Court to impose sanctions, award fees, strike their pleadings, or enter default judgment for willful non-compliance. Rule 37(e) also addresses spoliation of electronically stored information including body-worn camera footage and CAD records. In the District of New Jersey, Local Civil Rule 37.1 required me to complete a meet and confer before filing — which I completed on April 30, 2026." If you are trying to compel discovery and don't know what local rules and statutes govern compliance, you are wasting your time, and showing that you might not know what you are doing and aren't credible. This is akin to the tail wagging the dog or putting the cart before the horse. Sending a notice to opposing counsel achieves nothing...