NJ Transit and Coach USA Death Victims Advocacy

 So District Judge Mary Lou Alvarez blocked Paxton from trying that case?  Well I wonder what would happen if verified criminal complaints are sent to District Judge Mary Lou Alvarez and she doesn't do anything and then the Texas attorney general receives notice of District Judge Mary Lou Alvarez failing to fulfill a ministerial duty under Texas code of criminal procedure.  What do you think Randy K ? I'm thinking maybe a quo warranto or issue mandamus against the judge, but I don't have much to base that off of yet. I have to back this up with statute...but MWUAHAHA: What action can the Texas attorney general take against a judge if the judge fails to fulfil a ministerial duty, or fails to pm take action to suppress or prevent crime, or shields those from prosecution who have been accused of committing crime?The Texas Attorney General can petition a court for a writ of mandamus to compel a judge to perform a ministerial duty that is clearly required by law and involves ...

 Manus is just Claude Sonnet with some other tools. Claude can do the same (and better) with the proper skills: https://github.com/obra/superpowers Here is an example of some counter arguments and responses the agent gave me: ANTICIPATED COUNTERARGUMENT #1: "Chapter 45A authorizes complaints, which serve the same function as informations in municipal court." RESPONSE: This argument fails for three reasons: First, LEGAL DISTINCTION: A complaint is not an information. These are legally distinct instruments:   - Information (Art. 27.03): Filed by prosecuting attorney under oath   - Complaint (Art. 45.019): Filed by "any credible person" Different issuing authority = different legal status. Second, STATUTORY HIERARCHY: Article 27.01 says the primary pleading "IS the indictment or information" - not "complaint." If Legislature intended complaints to substitute for informations in municipal courts, it would have amended Article 27.01 to state: "ex...

 Found it and fixed it, Elise. Thank you and, once again, please support my work and promote my mission to MAKE AMERICA WISE AGAIN. AI is not all that some in these groups think it is. It does not and cannot understand tactics, and it certainly doesn't understand the "secret sauce" that is my unique method for presenting cases, the method that never fails when the law and facts are on your side. AI can only read other documents. It cannot read people, and reading people and preparing for battle is where my work shines. Elise ... Never try to prove your case with the complaint. The discovery phase is where we prove the facts alleged in the complaint, facts the court must take as TRUE when the opposition files a motion to dismiss. Too many in these groups ignore what I say about this, then when their complaint is dismissed the blame the judge. Also, you simply MUST begin to agree with me (and hopefully tell others) that cases are won ON PAPER, not on what you SAY in the cou...

 The ABA is the American Bar Association, a private membership organization that advocates for the legal profession that is voluntary to join. In Ohio, the “BAR” is really the equivalent of being licensed by the state to practice law. The Ohio constitution authorizes the Ohio Supreme Court to promulgate rules that govern admission criteria. When one is “admitted” to “the BAR” it means they have met the criteria to practice law (taken the required schooling, passed the BAR exam created by the Supreme Court, etc), not that they have joined the private membership organization known as the ABA or the state or county BAR associations. There is no requirement in Ohio that once a person passes the BAR exam and is there for “admitted” to “the BAR” by becoming licensed that they then must join any of those private organizations. Every state I know of has its own "state bar". In Florida it is regulated somewhat by the Florida Supreme Court but, like the ABA, it is NOT a governmental...

 roger that, here is a rewrite: Subject matter jurisdiction cannot be presumed, and any action taken without it is void. Garcia v. Dial, 596 S.W.2d 524, 527 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980); Nix v. State, 65 S.W.3d 664, 668 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001); Tex. Ass'n of Bus. v. Tex. Air Control Bd., 852 S.W.2d 440, 443–44 (Tex. 1993); Mapco, Inc. v. Forrest, 795 S.W.2d 700, 703 (Tex. 1990). When jurisdiction is challenged, the burden shifts to the party asserting it — here, the State — to plead facts affirmatively demonstrating that jurisdiction exists. State v. Holland, 221 S.W.3d 639, 642 (Tex. 2007); Tex. Ass'n of Bus., 852 S.W.2d at 446. When jurisdiction is challenged, the Court has an independent duty to verify that jurisdiction has been properly vested before proceeding. State v. Roberts, 940 S.W.2d 655, 657 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996), State v. Medrano, 67 S.W.3d 892, 903 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002). you can insist all you want in the municipal court but they don't follow the law.  You may have...

 So, if you make a declaration, the court is not going to check a pro-se's filings for errors? .... I have a hard time believing that. I would sooner believe that this ruling will protect bar members while allowing those same bar members to challenge a pro-se's filings without any evidence. We all know the courts will protect believe fellow bar members over pro-se litigants in courtroom proceedings..... I stand on my claim that it is a stupid ruling that will do nothing to protect us from bad filings from bar members. I realize I sound cynical, but it is not unwarranted. No, your appellate court case never made it past the gatekeeper to become a formal case. Your petition was denied because it did not meet the threshold that the Appellate Court applies of “extraordinary relief”. There were 2 thresholds that needed to be met: 1) technical - timeliness, and all the right documents filed 2) appropriateness in the Appellate Court which according to the statutes is “extraordinary re...

 https://youtu.be/eF-vHR2IanA Bar members lose citizen-ship upon becoming a member.  They're foreign. They will test you a Wo/man and try to get you to cave.   At this point all you can do is try because you are uncertain what to do. You can try this.  I am woman require you a man (sheriff or deputy) to deliver this instrument/adverse claim to the judge and hand deliver or register mail with witnesses to them a birth certificate. That’s who they are after.   You just agree to be the SURETY and you should be the SUBROGEE and subrogate the entire case   That’s how I would handle it   They can’t do shit to a living Wo/man “if” your status is corrected and they have been NOTICED. 24   order Order on Motion to Dismiss Thu 02/19 3:04 PM ORDER - In light of Plaintiff's amended complaint, ECF No. 23 , the pending motions to dismiss, ECF Nos. 17 , 19 - 21 , are DENIED as moot. Defendants have until March 12, 2026, to file an answer or...

 @iceman_bear I also like the idea mentioned above of making a custom official-looking sticker. Also I have been thinking about getting a custom license plate frame that says something like NOT FOR HIRE - PRIVATE PROPERTY (or something like UCC 9-109 : CONSUMER GOODS) I would actually prefer to have out of state plates - even less of a reason for them to assume that my property is under their jurisdiction, especially since I am not “in” their “state” to begin with I've heard Alphonse referring to a "Writ of Scire facia" numerous times and had to look it up today. Very interesting about it being a remedy against Federal Judges. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scire_facias 🔴 I would like to encourage everyone to join PEOPLE'S RIGHTS. The video below is a discussion with Ammon Bundy and Rtymtngrl! It serves as a great primer on how People's Rights works, and the tools available to you when you join.  https://rumble.com/vhzvf9-ammon-bundy-and-peoples-rights.org.html...

  2021-06-04
 Records Request of Sussex County Prosecutor's Office ATTN: NJ Custodian, Jerome Paul Neidhardt, fax (973) 383-4929 Regarding records you have, please promptly provide me with a URL or email attachment or similar access to remotely inspect the following electronic records as soon as possible, regardless of whether you recognize common law right of access, or the NJ Open Public Records Act (OPRA), or other authorities similarly mandating your good-faith transparent and prompt response: SEARCH WARRANTS, WIRETAP ORDERS AND REPORTS 1: all search warrants or wiretap orders in the last 90 days; 2: all wiretap application reports relating to those; SUBPOENAS OR DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO NON-PARTY 3: all subpoenas or other discovery directed to a non-party in the last 90 days; 4: all supervisory certifications regarding suppression or delay of notices for those; SUPPORT, AUTHORITY 5: all statements, applications, related and supporting documentation, including, but not ...

 I can point to two things that I've read myself that I believe @b_freely has mentioned in the past: 1) Texas Constitution article 5 section 12 (b) The presentment of an indictment or information to a court invests the court with jurisdiction of the cause. 2) Texas code of criminal procedure Article 27.01 The primary pleading in a criminal action on the part of the State is the indictment or information. Summary: The Texas Constitution clearly states and describes what is required to invest jurisdiction in a criminal court. This is backed up and repeated in Article 27.01 of the code of criminal procedure. In no way is a complaint described as having the power that DA's and municipal judges claim that they have.  Every time I've heard a city attorney or a district attorney attempt to explain this they only cite the statute that states the requirements of the sufficiency of a complaint, and then they lie to the court and claim that that is not sufficiency of the complaint but...

 That is why I put plates on my Avlanche that say, "Dead Heading."  It gives notice that I am not operating in commerce and although I have entered into a commercial agreement with the state which will allow me to use the highways in comomerce, the dead heaing plates gives notice that I am not operating under that contract.   Being forced to display evidence of a private commercial contract would violate my 4th amentment right to privacy of my papers. put the plates on the suburban so all my cars and trucks are privet now, let the games begin My Avalanche is plated.  I can operate it in commerce if I want to.  I have a valid driver's license and can use it in commerce if I choose.  So, the only violation they can show is a failure to publicly display evidence of a private contract.  I am looking forward to that fight, but the last time the DPS pulled me over, they wrote a warning, and I had a fit.  I demanded my ticket, even demanded that the...

 Here is the second phase of my jurisdictional challenge — if they somehow come up with proof of authority to enforce Section B of the Transportation Code. This one is for their lack of primary pleadings. then you should SAY "no primary pleadings"; don't say "no valid complaint". i went back and took a better look after dinner, and i'd like to ask why you're citing Huynh and perpetuating the false notion that a corporation court gets to commence a criminal action by a complaint instead of holding their feet to the fire of what the Texas Constitution (and current statutes) clearly require: primary pleadings: an indictment or an information (with the supporting sworn complaint filed alongside). let's talk this over a little more before you file it. Could you elaborate more on this? I know they will reason that the complaint is a valid “charging instrument”. Huynh seems to cover this exactly so this is likely to come up (if they are somewhat competent)...

 Right. I did read the above document. It gives you the pros and cons of keeping or dropping the FDEM. My case is a bit different. I am filing suit against 2 sheriffs deputies, the county prosecutors office, and my local city court judge and his staff. I was charged with Disorderly Conduct for cussing out an officer and I fought my criminal case as a Pro Se for 11 months. I ultimately prevailed against them all and the Circuit Court judge ruled in my favor and dismissed my case; ruling that the charge against me was unconstitutional. But throughout those 11 months, I endured multiple violations of my rights and the attempt to railroad me at the city court level was just unbelievable. Funny thing is, is that the entire time these bad actors were attempting to railroad me and violate my rights, they were stupid enough to make all of their actions known to the point that I have nearly every one of their actions documented. I have even been able to figure out how to defeat their ‘absol...

 Your situation sounds exactly like mine! I won based on my evidence countered their LACK of EVIDENCE. And I argued that the court cannot produce evidence for the employer. They tended to ignore this argument because the LACK of EVIDENCE was so clear they didn’t need to consider my remaining questions. If you need help let me know. I filed a tort claim - abuse of process along with my wrongful termination claims that named both the employer and the attorney representing the attorney. Yes they are fighting this tooth and nail and I am now in the Supreme Court of MD. So I believe especially since you prevailed in the initial, that abuse of process can be your cause of action in a collateral action. I only asked for my attorney fees as damages (used the attorney until I got to the the Appellate level and then could not afford him any more) but the cause of action could stand by itself when you add in your time and efforts and pain and suffering still falling under compensatory damages...

 There are state supreme court rulings and SCOTUS rulings. If the state court rulings set precedence and are not ruled on or addressed by the supreme Court of the US, then the state court rulings set precedence, unless the SCOTUS rulings override the state rulings. Someone please correct me if I am . Good Morning, if a written decision in an Administrative Procedure with a state agency is completely missing everything I have verbally testified numerous times (clearly available in hours of audio recordings that they refuse to put in writing) should the Appeal committee listen to these audios? Can they just ignore audios just because it’s not on paper? If they try to NOT listen to the audio recordings how do I go about getting Appeal to listen and take that into account? First and foremost,you must understand the Rules of your game! Check the specific appeal rules/procedures. Look at the agency's appeal notice, regulations, or state Administrative Procedure Act for how Evidence / ...

 Supreme Court In Washington Rule A Person Doesn't Have To Take The Bar Exam To Become An Attorney  https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2024/mar/15/supreme-court-bar-exam-will-no-longer-be-required-/

 Morning, so what I have been wrestling with is, how do you, as the living man or woman, come at the court and be sucessful... without sacrifycing your position as an Equitable man/woman... thats what i did but i had to come at them as a trustee because is was a replevin for trust property... which becomes an issue with statutory as they are not supposed to deal with express trusts Any chance you can come as the beneficiary? Beneficiary has to be natural human being not a purpose as they are the only ones that can be relied upon to bring trustee to account. Can’t remember the case law. a beneficiary doesn’t have standing in court It's not.   A beneficiary wouldn't be filing anything into a court I live in a state where speeding is not considered a misdemeanor (it's a fine). I don't have a ticket I'm fighting, but how do you go about fighting in the states where it's not a criminal violation? A TL;DR would suffice and I'll try to research the rest. Notify the...

 What is it exactly that you want to accomplish? My advice is to learn the municipal and vehicle codes and to find out how they don't apply. I'm fighting citations now and I'm literally not a responsible person per the code itself. You have to collaterally attack the ordinances and keep it short and sweet when you do. These agencies are very adept and deprive you of due process so there is no margin of error when it comes to your arguments and adherence to the rules. Yes I did look at the codes, I've been using paid for AI to help me find the relevant information and it's been amazing. In ca. There's a specific process that they outline, which I posted above if you scroll up. It's this very process and vehicle code that is in question. The problem is that there is a conflict of interest with the hearing Examiner that THEY hire. They claim it's an independent third party but it's not. So basically they railroad you. After that you have to appeal it in...

  One I'm not talking to the opposition. This commission is an "independent" commission created to oversee the taxing agency of the state. They were created as a quasi-judicial body.  go administrative (quasi-judicial) or judicial, OR they can go judicial after the decision of the commissioner on the case, i.e. going administrative doesn't preclude judicial but judicial precludes any administrative process. What IS Common Law? Many people do not know what “common law” truly IS. Common law is not something static, some set of laws that never changes. Common law is constantly changing! Common law is judge-made law. It is the sum total of all unreversed appellate court decisions … as opposed to legislative enactments or executive orders. Every unreversed appellate court decision, including decisions rendered today by our highest courts, creates new common law. Misunderstanding about what common law IS causes unnecessary confusion, frustration, and failed attempts to get ...

If its been a while since your motion.  Perhaps renew the motion and make it clear in the revised motion that your waiving oral argument for this motion An order granting a Motion for Judicial Notice establishes the fact or law as true for the remainder of the case. Please study that section in my Discovery class. Thank you. https://www.howtowinincourt.com I have; it's where I stole the idea of moving for judicial notice (which is brilliant). My point was asking about if the order addresses each item listed on the motion (assuming multiple paragraphs/points or if the order takes all items in the motion on the whole and approves or denies on the whole. Good morning. Is an arraignment the same thing as an initial hearing? I am taking Jurisdictionary and there is mention of arraignment, which did not happen in the case of a friend who is being criminally charged for calling 911 too many times for "non-public safety" reasons. She was worried about her child, who was being wit...

 Legal Notes  Admins please correct if I’m wrong: I believe in criminal you need it dismissed first or found not guilty before you can sue for things like malicious prosecution. I’ve been told to focus efforts on challenging jurisdiction, and other affirmative defenses. You can, however file your own criminal charges, turn them in to police or sheriff and attach those to your responses. you could dismiss your current case then start a new case in the federal.     not saying that's what you should do just in theory Yes we have been thinking about that option because so far we are getting nowhere with this case. We fired attorneys because we found out that they are assisting the defendants. We went pro se at the end of August 2024 and filed  6 motions which were ignored by the judge. He gave some bs excuse which tell us that he is corrupt also. That is why we were thinking about changing venue. notice of removal to federal court The removal jurisdiction ...