NJ Transit and Coach USA Death Victims Advocacy

 EDUCATIONAL PURPOSE 

New Jersey Attorneys Do Not Have License To Practice Law The Supreme Court Give Them Privilège To Handle Legal Matters  Attorneys only have a Bar Membership not a license to practice law. They are giving a number from the bar card to handle legal matters on the behalf of you by the Supreme Court. So, called license to practice law is false. The court grant these attorney a privilege not a right to so called practicing law.  An attorney is called an agent based on Cornell Law website definition. On the website also define attorney-at-fact and power- of -attorney, which someone who did not go to school to learn legal matters can appoint you to represent you in your legal matters.  The world 🌍 is the Matrix because the people who implants this narrative that you need to go to law school to practice law. The reality is that this delusion of going to Law School that you are learning law.  Reality check...law school does not teach you law. The students are learning method...

  Trombetta v. Atlantic City ROBERT TROMBETTA, PLAINTIFF, v. THE MAYOR AND COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Atlantic County.   , .. a law subjecting the exercise of First Amendment freedoms to the prior restraint of a license, without narrow, objective, and definite standards to guide the licensing authority, is unconstitutional. "It is settled by a long line of recent decisions of this Court that an ordinance which, like this one, makes the peaceful enjoyment of freedoms which the Constitution guarantees contingent upon the uncontrolled will of an official as by requiring a permit or license which may be granted or withheld in the discretion of such official is an unconstitutional censorship or prior restraint upon the enjoyment of those freedoms." [at 151, 89 S. Ct. at 938; citation omitted].

New Jersey, a law that subjects First Amendment licensing, without clear and objective standards, is unconstitutional New Jersey, a law that subjects First Amendment licensing, without clear and objective standards, is unconstitutional  In New Jersey, a law that subjects First Amendment freedoms to prior restraint through licensing, without clear and objective standards, is unconstitutional, as it gives the licensing authority undue discretion.   Here's a more detailed explanation: Prior Restraint and the First Amendment: The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, and the New Jersey Constitution, protects freedom of speech, including the freedom to express oneself through various means.  A "prior restraint" is a government action that prevents someone from exercising their right to speak or express themselves before they actually do so.   Unconstitutionality of Broad Discretion: A licensing system that allows a government body to censor or restrict speech before i...

 New Jersey Bill of Rights On November 20, 1789, New Jersey became the first state to ratify the Bill of Rights - the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution. Of the twelve articles proposed, New Jersey actually approved eleven. The first, relating to how federal representation would be determined based on population, was ratified by New Jersey but not by the required number of states. The second, relating to the salaries of members of Congress, was rejected by New Jersey, but then approved in 1992 as the 27th Amendment. Articles 3 through 12 became the 1st through 10th Amendments, guaranteeing the fundamental rights and freedoms of all American Citizens. A full transcription and image of New Jersey's original parchment Bill of Rights are provided below. Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred eighty nine. The Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their a...

  “ The Fourth Amendment and Probable Cause And Reasonable Suspicion The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” 4th Amendment  Central to this amendment is the notion of an "expectation of privacy." Numerous U.S. Supreme Court decisions have refined this idea and dictated: How police can gather evidence How that evidence can be used in a criminal trial The court's decisions strive to strike a balance between constitutional rights and law enforcement's capacity to investigate crimes. The legal system manages this by mandating probable cause. What is Probable Cause? Probable cause is a fundamental concept in Fourth Amendment jurisprudence. It serves as the threshold for law enforcemen...