NJ Transit and Coach USA Death Victims Advocacy

 Ask yourself these questions: Who owed you a duty? What did they do or not do that breached that duty? How did their breach of duty cause you damages? How much money will make you whole again? There are likely many "causes of action" other than 1983 for which you can sue. Thank you Dr. Graves this is great. I’m in a similar position thinking I can file a federal 1983 but indeed, I did not look for more “causes of action” EDIT: I wrote out these questions and answers. I answered them all (except the question of what amount can make me whole again: how do I decide that?!) They’re all government employees, some of which are BAR attorneys. I’m stuck in probably non-lawsuit thinking or something (?) The BAR attorneys who played Hearing Officer aka Administrative Law Judges owed me a duty that’s written in their Rules. They breached those rules in different ways. That breach directly damaged me financially. Now because I didn’t loose (I won but didn’t really win anything) I can’t ...

 Highway Program 

 Parking Ticket 

 For Your Information 

 

 United States v. Mitchell (various cases, but see e.g., 405 F. Supp. 2d 602, D. Md. 2005; also referenced in multiple federal filings) Defendant argued "private travel" in a non-commercial vehicle exempts him from licensing/registration. Court rejected it: "The motor vehicle definitions used in 18 U.S.C. § 31 do not apply to plaintiff... Title 18 does not cover the entire subject of motor vehicle regulation... It does not preempt state vehicle registration requirements." Dismissed as meritless. Taylor v. State (Tex. App. 2008, unpublished but cited in later cases) Defendant claimed "non-commercial activity" exempts him from driver's license requirement. Court rejected: "The argument that the license requirement applies only to commercial drivers has been repeatedly rejected as frivolous." Conviction upheld. State v. Booher (Ohio Ct. App. 2001, referenced in multiple sovereign/rights cases) Defendant argued private use of vehicle exempts him ...