@InsideOutHomeServices334:All Courts are commercial @Black Letter Law:So you can’t explain how. You have a misinterpretation of a definition. This is why I ou lose 100% of the time. @Black Letter Law:Explain to me how. By law and process. Because public law is pretty self explanatory but you seem to think public law is commercial law. So, explain how that works when a statute is enacted by The People and passed through articles 1-3 of the constitution. Explain it please. @InsideOutHomeServices334:The UCC is there to protect you and reserve your rights when they (the court) attempt to assume you have a contract with them. @Black Letter Law:Public law is not negotiable and public law does not mix with commercial law. Public law is enacted by the people through articles 1-3 of the constitution. If you’re a state citizen, laws passed by state citizens and enacted by congress apply to you. No contact needed. The people are owed due process and a state attorney aka prosecutor who pro se...
@by: James-david::The government can only make law for its employees and the Elected office... prior to the Civil war Now since The Act of 1871 they have become like kings and forgot how we got here.. @FirstVerarchist:The Constitution is just a claim of ownership over us, which isn't valid @Black Letter Law:If the Constitution were “ownership,” rights wouldn’t exist against the government, courts couldn’t strike laws down, and officials wouldn’t be bound by oath. The entire structure proves the opposite: the government is subordinate to the people, not the other way around. Calling it “ownership” isn’t a legal argument, it’s lazy, and it’s just refusing the social contract while still benefiting from it. The Constitution is not a claim of ownership over people. It’s a grant of limited power from the people to government. That’s explicit in the text and confirmed by the courts. Here is some case law to support the rebuttal. “We the People”, not the state, are the source of authorit...
