NJ Transit and Coach USA Death Victims Advocacy

 Is this a new case?  Or old If it's new current case.  And you file a reply or appear.  That's a waiver of improper service.    Unless you take other steps to preserve the issue Another approach would be to not show and not answer.    If your correct about the improper service the judge should notice if its obvious. Get a copy from the Court Docket . Scrutinize it for errors in dates, addresses, descriptions, or methods used. Support it with Evidence showing that the Service did not follow court Rules . Check your specific court's Rules . In my mind,I'd focus on the Motion (supported with the above), and shift the burden back to the Plaintiff , who must then prove Service was proper at the Hearing . Now is the time to prepare for battle.    Service will likely be effected sooner or later, and then when that happens you will need to know about what we call The Flurry of Motions:    Motion to Dismiss  ...

 Are you currently a Jurisdictionary Student ? You must have a firm grasp of the basics,to understand how to defend yourself. Jurisdictionary will teach you: #1 ... How to draft proper Pleadings #2 ... How to use Discovery Tools #3 ... How to Move the Court. #4 ... Rules of Evidence #5 ... How, when, and why to use Objections You must also follow the Rules of your court's jurisdiction. Winning is possible, if you understand how to utilize Court Procedure and Evidence Tactics, effectively. http://www.howtowinincourt.com?refercode=LB0034 my thoughts exactly, this part was not done, the defendant only knew a complaint even existed because they started getting solicitations in the mail from other law offices wanting to represent them i figured the next move is either a motion to dismiss for improper service of process, or a notice of inquiry for evidence of proper service Be sure to never try to appeal to a court for empathy, sympathy, or offer excuses. Courts only consider document...

 Joshua Hardeway: I’m in Louisiana and it’s called a Rule NISI. It’s an existing case within the state. Catherine Albertini: I posted a YouTube video in other legal groups today, but can't post it here. I highly recommend that you watch this video which demonstrates the power that one can have in court by following Dr. Graves course. The man who won his case utilized the tactics that the course will teach you. With this knowledge that costs less than a hourLy fee charged by an attorney and taught by Dr. Graves, the knowledge will enable one to turn despair into a weapon of mass destruction. The video is titled "They cut my trees for a better view, so I ruined their view forever." Joshua Hardeway: I do appreciate the help but I have already in my possession the 45 CFR 302.34 cooperative arrangements (contracts) between the 42 USC 654(3) single and separate organizational unit housed in the executive branch and the district courts deeming article 3 judges as contractors for...

 Okay, this is a completely different animal from the complaint. This response to the MTD is significantly better written and much more legally sound. The laches argument is sharp. The distinction between “prejudice caused by the delay” versus “prejudice caused by the relief sought” is a real legal distinction, and he articulated it cleanly. That’s the kind of argument that actually makes judges think. The citation to Mathieu v. Mahoney is appropriate and on point. The circular standing argument is also solid. You can’t strip a plaintiff of standing using the very unconstitutional act he’s challenging. That’s logically tight. The mandamus clarification on page 2 was smart and necessary; essentially saying “call it whatever you want, it’s really declaratory and injunctive relief.” That preempts a purely technical dismissal. The case law citations need verification. I cannot confirm without searching right now whether Fernandez v. Takata, Sears v. Hull, Mathieu v. Mahoney, and Johnso...

 Dude named Ben: Has anyone addressed the problem of people in court being viewed as a legal fiction? elise: For now gather their lawyer number, if they’re current, any BAR information, even their oath on this petty lawyer, see if he had complaints (he’s a newbie if i remember correctly so that might be unlikely but I discovered “tricks” on a 20+yr lawyer last week who was ….. through BAR complaints and punished — sorry forgot what those verbs are and what the punishment was but he’s still practicing). I learned his dirty tricks which help me see what NOT  to fall for and recognize so I can immediately tell the judge. If he keeps doing petty stuff you can tell the judge and/or file something against him as an attorney who took an oath at the place where they signed their oath (differs fir each). So far I have everyone’s info and I let them know I do—two since retired, unsure if that’s related— I have not filed any official complaints yet however the BAR said I should, but Dr. ...

 Before I share the answer to your question, this can be answered by taking this course: https://howtowinincourt.com?refercode=WC0086 ——- On the FedEx question: The short answer is — it depends on your court's rules, but FedEx is generally acceptable for discovery documents, NOT for original service of process. Here's the breakdown: For discovery documents (like a Request for Production): Most court rules allow service of discovery on opposing counsel by various means including hand-delivery, mail, fax, or private courier. FedEx would typically count and has an important advantage — you get a time-stamped delivery receipt proving delivery. That's actually better than certified mail in some ways. The smarter move, though: The course materials strongly advise that when dealing with a bad actor who seems to be evading, the best approach is to use a process server or the Sheriff's department, because they file a sworn affidavit with the court proving service. That's the...